jonoslack
Active member
Hi Brad
Not much plastic in the camera either!
Hi Lili
Thank you - there's nothing like wet water!
There's a nice 3d feel about the images - at least, I think so. I'm not sure how you do justice to 24mp files at 900x900!
Hi David
the 135 f1.8 is a big beast - lovely for portraits, but too much for me. I've got the Zeiss 24-70 though, and the Sony 70-300 G - both seem sharp, quit and responsive - lovely
As for the cats and dogs - well, they're all urinating in the wrong place and causing trouble.
I hope all is well with you.
It certainly does seem to be a good bang for the buck in the present market.Hi Jono,
I think the A900 is the bargain of the decade. Very impressive.
-Brad
Not much plastic in the camera either!
Hi Lili
Hi Lilijonoslack, love them all, but the sshot of the water...it looks so very WET, excellent image
Thank you - there's nothing like wet water!
There's a nice 3d feel about the images - at least, I think so. I'm not sure how you do justice to 24mp files at 900x900!
Hi David
You are right - some of the old minolta stuff has come 'forward' to Sony. I tried to buy a 50mm f1.4 on ebay, but it went for nearly £200, so I bought a new one for $240 - it's lovely, nice bokeh, small etc.So maybe it will be a contender
http://forum.getdpi.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2370
Hi Jono
Must confess the name Zeiss T* brings back fond memories from my Contax 137MA, RTS 11 days. So if I need to go full frame the Sony with the 24-70 and 135 f1.8 have to be a good option. I'm not a "Wide" boy, despite what some say but the Zeiss is on the way and there is some good old minolta stuff out there If I needed it.
the 135 f1.8 is a big beast - lovely for portraits, but too much for me. I've got the Zeiss 24-70 though, and the Sony 70-300 G - both seem sharp, quit and responsive - lovely
As for the cats and dogs - well, they're all urinating in the wrong place and causing trouble.
I hope all is well with you.