Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
as long as she is sober (but one could fear, or what..?) and well-skilled it's okay for my part for her to go through Öresund, but we do have a lot of drunken russian captains who hit bridges, coastlines or the bottom here....so you have to make sure, Quentin..Lets lighten the mood here...
I am still in Monaco, but I am a bit worried about the qualifications of this particular Yacht Captain ....
HaHa...absolutely Thorkil! Fortunately she will not be put to the test, because although she is Russian, she is my Director of Business Development and not (so far as I am aware) a trained seafarer.as long as she is sober (but one could fear, or what..?) and well-skilled it's okay for my part for her to go through Öresund, but we do have a lot of drunken russian captains who hit bridges, coastlines or the bottom here....so you have to make sure, Quentin..
Thorkil
...Okay then...but you have to beware. But she look friendly-minded. And so long as she let you do the overall navigation, things should be in safe hands, I would think!HaHa...absolutely Thorkil! Fortunately she will not be put to the test, because although she is Russian, she is my Director of Business Development and not (so far as I am aware) a trained seafarer.
Very nice B&W harbor images. I like the toning as well.Boston harbor.
There is nothing sad about it, quantity can never make up for quality. Get what you want, not want what you can get. Raw processing can hardly be an issue here, beats developing and scanning films hands down ....The nice thing about a deliberate approach to photography (as opposed to a machine gun approach) is fewer shots to deal with. A sad habit left over from expensive film days I suppose.
Thorkil,Hi Carl, don't let my bad mood about the one picture from the DP1M, spoil your further investigation in the abilities of the DP1M. After all some pictures are turning up from the DP1M that show some of the same sharpness and good rendering as the DP2M, or it seems like it, at Flickr, and your last one was rather good too!
Thorkil
Thanks for keeping on, Carl !Thorkil,
Don't worry, I haven't given up yet. Still working with the DP1M. I'm noticing that I have to be much more careful about exposure with the DP1M to avoid blocking up shadows.
I can see more well defined fine detail in large Sigma DPM prints, compared to prints from my other cameras (XP1, OMD, NEX7).First post here. Amazing images coming from this camera with obviously a very talented group of photographers taking them. I wonder if one would be able to tell the difference in a 12"x18" or 16"x20" print compared to the Sony RX100 (the compact I was planning to get before I happened upon this thread) for example. In other words, does the vibrancy and almost 3D quality that one sees on a monitor translate to a noticeable difference in a large print?
Thanks,
Jim
OK, here is the list;Carl.......these look pretty awesome. They really exhibit well balanced exposures. Is this all learning curve?
Specifically, which one is from the DP1M (or DP1M stitch)?
You know why I am asking
R
Thanks for the info.I can see more well defined fine detail in large Sigma DPM prints, compared to prints from my other cameras (XP1, OMD, NEX7).