just...when I use the GR I'm not the patient type that succeed in careful framing and focusing, and the camera inspire me, not to.
Then I often miss the effective Nikon feeling, quickly framing and fire away (and see what you exactly get)...but there is a trap to fall into: it can become way too easy to fire away, and the trap is, what is easy available and too easy to get, you don't appreciate in the sufficient way...and you get bored too, and you loose the inspiration from the camera, and you are in risk of loosing some carefulness. That's why a M is nice to use, there is an Automatic filter "builded ind", you become more careful, alone by the focus-way, and the framing is a free thing to follow.
But a Df might inspire you to do compromises (against a D800/600/D3 etc), a bit more carefulness (at least for my part), although, and even if, you might end up with digital settings like is was a D610, but even though, I think it’s an important issue (+ it gives this solid and trusty feeling).
I think it’s this issue that made someone like Steve Huff buy the Df although he from principle don't like DSLR's
thorkil
but yes John, I agree upon, keep it simple, for heavens sake (but then there will only be a GR and a Df
)