Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Yes indeed! I would be so happy with a camera with good clean ISO 50! Tired of carrying ND filters, heck, even 64 would be goodLawdy Miss Clawdy.
819,200.
Hands up who remembers Kodachrome II.
25.
Both extremes would be useful to me.Yes indeed! I would be so happy with a camera with good clean ISO 50! Tired of carrying ND filters, heck, even 64 would be good
This new camera must be for spelunkers without headlamps.
Speaking from earlier disappointments, I am confident that will not happen. Pentax seems to know how to get the maximum out of a Sony sensor. Sony still are content to be the largest imaging sensor makers in the world.Depending on IQ of this camera it makes one excited for the performance of an A7sIII.
KP = Kevin Peterson, ex England cricketer?!From what I've the seen of the specs. the KP comes closer than many, but I can't say I like the looks of it, and living in the UK the name is nuts.
I exposed at ASA 32, so it was a faster film for me . For low light I used Kodachrome X.Lawdy Miss Clawdy.
819,200.
Hands up who remembers Kodachrome II.
25.
Never say never. I didn't find anything objectionable about the A7s cameras except the megapixel count.Speaking from earlier disappointments, I am confident that will not happen. Pentax seems to know how to get the maximum out of a Sony sensor. Sony still are content to be the largest imaging sensor makers in the world.