k-hawinkler
Well-known member
I just updated my E-M1.1 to FW version 4.4. :thumbup:
The GetDPI Photography Forum
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
E-M1, E-M5, E-M5.2, etc. ... Peculiarities
- Thread starter k-hawinkler
- Start date
k-hawinkler
Well-known member
Juniper Titmouse
Olympus E-M1MarkII + M.300mm F4.0 @ ISO 320, FOCAL LENGTH 300.0 mm, APERTURE f/4.5, EXPOSURE TIME 0.0004s (1/2500)
Olympus E-M1MarkII + M.300mm F4.0 @ ISO 320, FOCAL LENGTH 300.0 mm, APERTURE f/4.5, EXPOSURE TIME 0.0004s (1/2500)
k-hawinkler
Well-known member
My mistake. Those are Bushtits, not Titmouse. Sorry. :banghead:House Finch • Titmouse
Olympus E-M1MarkII + ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 300mm 1:2.8 @ ISO 200, FOCAL LENGTH 300.0 mm, APERTURE f/3.5, EXPOSURE TIME 0.0004s (1/2500)
k-hawinkler
Well-known member
Olympus E-M1MarkII + M.300mm F4.0 @ ISO 2000, FOCAL LENGTH 300.0 mm, APERTURE f/4.5, EXPOSURE TIME 0.0004s (1/2500)
Knorp
Well-known member
Really ? They seem very similar, but the Titmouse got this crest, right ?
k-hawinkler
Well-known member
Correct Bart. Thanks.
Also the Juniper Titmouse is by itself.
However typically the Bushtits tend to show up in larger numbers.
k-hawinkler
Well-known member
Flying or merely Jumping? 
Olympus E-M1MarkII + OLYMPUS M.300mm F4.0 @ ISO 400, FOCAL LENGTH 300.0 mm, APERTURE f/4.5, EXPOSURE TIME 0.0004s (1/2500)
Olympus E-M1MarkII + OLYMPUS M.300mm F4.0 @ ISO 400, FOCAL LENGTH 300.0 mm, APERTURE f/4.5, EXPOSURE TIME 0.0004s (1/2500)
k-hawinkler
Well-known member
Olympus E-M1MarkII + OLYMPUS M.300mm F4.0 @ ISO 800, FOCAL LENGTH 300.0 mm, APERTURE f/4.5, EXPOSURE TIME 0.0004s (1/2500)
ptomsu
Workshop Member
K-H,
Olympus E-M1MarkII + OLYMPUS M.300mm F4.0 @ ISO 800, FOCAL LENGTH 300.0 mm, APERTURE f/4.5, EXPOSURE TIME 0.0004s (1/2500)
especially this shot is award winning awesome!
Peter
k-hawinkler
Well-known member
Many thanks Peter. I appreciate your feedback very much.
IIRC I used Pro Cap Hi for this shot.
I tried a few times Pro Cap Lo with C-AF Tr and IBIS ON - but I saw some jitter in the EVF.
Also the system then didn't seem as responsive as I would like it to be. :facesmack:
ptomsu
Workshop Member
Neighbours cat in the tree - she was around 10 meters high after a fight with another cat that sat down in the garden
EM1.2 with 4/300 Pro
2018-03-08_0001.jpg by ptomsu, on Flickr
2018-03-08_0004.jpg by ptomsu, on Flickr
EM1.2 with 4/300 Pro
2018-03-08_0001.jpg by ptomsu, on Flickr2018-03-08_0004.jpg by ptomsu, on Flickr
k-hawinkler
Well-known member
Olympus E-M1MarkII + OLYMPUS M.300mm F4.0 @ ISO 320, FOCAL LENGTH 300.0 mm, APERTURE f/4.5, EXPOSURE TIME 0.0004s (1/2500)
k-hawinkler
Well-known member
Images from the past, taken with the
OLYMPUS M.75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II
OLYMPUS M.75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II
Knorp
Well-known member
That PL 200/2.8 is apparently one tough cookie ...
Attachments
k-hawinkler
Well-known member
Many thanks Bart. Hmm, how about that!
It seems only the E-M1.2 that causes trouble and not the E-M5.2.
I better do the FW update now.
Although I currently have no plans to buy the PL 200/2.8.
However I am interested how the Sony FE 400/2.8 turns out. :facesmack:
Those two lenses seem to be competing for the same reach though.
Knorp
Well-known member
For the same reach, yes. But for the same price ... :shocked:Many thanks Bart. Hmm, how about that!
It seems only the E-M1.2 that causes trouble and not the E-M5.2.
I better do the FW update now.
Although I currently have no plans to buy the PL 200/2.8.
However I am interested how the Sony FE 400/2.8 turns out. :facesmack:
Those two lenses seem to be competing for the same reach though.
k-hawinkler
Well-known member
Well Bart, you also get more metal and glass! :ROTFL:
:ROTFL: However, the A9 is such a superior camera IMHO. :grin: :thumbs:
So I intend to get some proper tele glass for it! :watch:
k-hawinkler
Well-known member
I hadn't used my 40-150/2.8 with MC-14 in awhile. After updating FW to 2.1, my E-M1.2 seems to continue to work just fine with this lens. Of course this update targeted an issue with the E-M1.2 not correctly focusing the PL 200/2.8.
Olympus E-M1MarkII + M.40-150mm F2.8 + MC-14 @ ISO 200, FOCAL LENGTH 210.0 mm, APERTURE f/4.5, EXPOSURE TIME 0.0004s (1/2500)
Looking at this image I see no urgent need to acquire the PL 200/2.8 as well, also considering all my other FT, MFT lenses that cover the 280 and 400mm range. :grin:
One observation I have, images look best if one is close enough to resolve feather detail!
Olympus E-M1MarkII + M.40-150mm F2.8 + MC-14 @ ISO 200, FOCAL LENGTH 210.0 mm, APERTURE f/4.5, EXPOSURE TIME 0.0004s (1/2500)
Looking at this image I see no urgent need to acquire the PL 200/2.8 as well, also considering all my other FT, MFT lenses that cover the 280 and 400mm range. :grin:
One observation I have, images look best if one is close enough to resolve feather detail!
Last edited:
Knorp
Well-known member
And right you are ! Better safe your buckazoids for that monstrous 400/2.8 ...
k-hawinkler
Well-known member
Bart, here is a video of bees drinking water and constantly pumping their abdomen. First a still image.
Olympus E-M1 + M.300mm F4.0 + MC-14 @ ISO 200, FOCAL LENGTH 420.0 mm, APERTURE f/8, EXPOSURE TIME 0.00625s (1/160)
Then the link to the video.
[video]https://winklers.smugmug.com/KHW/Pics-by-Subjects/Bee-videos/i-skqTHPt[/video]
Olympus E-M1 + M.300mm F4.0 + MC-14 @ ISO 200, FOCAL LENGTH 420.0 mm, APERTURE f/8, EXPOSURE TIME 0.00625s (1/160)
Then the link to the video.
[video]https://winklers.smugmug.com/KHW/Pics-by-Subjects/Bee-videos/i-skqTHPt[/video]