The GetDPI Photography Forum

Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!

So Leica makes cameras for pros... Really?????

Status
Not open for further replies.

PeterA

Well-known member
I'm surprised that people still think there is such a thing as 'a camera for pros'..
as for Canon and FD - wot about Leica and R - that really made me cry!!:ROTFL:
 

flash

New member
I've had all the issues the OP has had. Some of them multiple times. Leica service times are truley woeful. Like Vieri, I've also had a very reliable experience with the newer systems (SL, CL/TL, M10) so I really do feel Leica have crossed a bridge when it comes to reliability. I use my SL for most of my work (now with an S1R for high res requirements) and I don't worry that the camera isn't up to the task. Their service times are still woeful though and I don't trust my S007 to be reliable.

However, although I really dislike waiting 5 months to have a lens repaired (I have a SL16-35 in at the moment and I'm resigned to not seeing it until September, I suppose. It's not a fault though. I dropped it.), I long ago learned that this was the way if you wanted to shoot Leica digital. I've always made sure I had a backup or alternative for when a body of lens goes down. There's no pro service at Leica, despite their weird announcements at the last Photokina. You need to be totally self sufficient. It is what it is. At the same time I have to acknowledge that Leica should do better. Surely they know there's an issue with service times. It does make you feel like they don't give a damn when the same shitty service times go on year after year after year. The staff at the Leica store in Sydney are friendly, helpful and knowledgeable. Having **** service support must be hard on them as well.

I suppose you could go with CPS or NPS if you wanted that kind of thing. I was a CPS member in Oz for nearly two decades and while repairs were fast, if you took it in yourself, not once when I needed a loaner, was one available. There was always something on (F1 or some launch) and I couldn't get a loan body when I needed it. That drove me nuts because they made a promise about service delivery and never once helped me out. I took in an EOS3 for a warranty job and all they had was an EOS500 as a loaner. Pointless. One of the reasons I changed to Leica. If I had to have backups of everything it might as well be with a camera I enjoy using.

Hasselblad have been better for me. My XCD30mm took 4-5 weeks from dealer to importer to Sweden and back. If only Leica could get close to those times, on occasion.

Gordon
 

vieri

Well-known member
I've had all the issues the OP has had. Some of them multiple times. Leica service times are truley woeful. Like Vieri, I've also had a very reliable experience with the newer systems (SL, CL/TL, M10) so I really do feel Leica have crossed a bridge when it comes to reliability. I use my SL for most of my work (now with an S1R for high res requirements) and I don't worry that the camera isn't up to the task. Their service times are still woeful though and I don't trust my S007 to be reliable.

However, although I really dislike waiting 5 months to have a lens repaired (I have a SL16-35 in at the moment and I'm resigned to not seeing it until September, I suppose. It's not a fault though. I dropped it.), I long ago learned that this was the way if you wanted to shoot Leica digital. I've always made sure I had a backup or alternative for when a body of lens goes down. There's no pro service at Leica, despite their weird announcements at the last Photokina. You need to be totally self sufficient. It is what it is. At the same time I have to acknowledge that Leica should do better. Surely they know there's an issue with service times. It does make you feel like they don't give a damn when the same shitty service times go on year after year after year. The staff at the Leica store in Sydney are friendly, helpful and knowledgeable. Having **** service support must be hard on them as well.

I suppose you could go with CPS or NPS if you wanted that kind of thing. I was a CPS member in Oz for nearly two decades and while repairs were fast, if you took it in yourself, not once when I needed a loaner, was one available. There was always something on (F1 or some launch) and I couldn't get a loan body when I needed it. That drove me nuts because they made a promise about service delivery and never once helped me out. I took in an EOS3 for a warranty job and all they had was an EOS500 as a loaner. Pointless. One of the reasons I changed to Leica. If I had to have backups of everything it might as well be with a camera I enjoy using.

Hasselblad have been better for me. My XCD30mm took 4-5 weeks from dealer to importer to Sweden and back. If only Leica could get close to those times, on occasion.

Gordon
Totally agree, the new Leica's are much more reliable (I don't want to jinx it saying they are trouble-free, but that's how the SL have been, for me at least), but as you said that doesn't justify piss-poor customer service for those times when you need something serviced for any reasons, including our fault.

My experience with Hasselblad is a mixed bag:

First. I had a 21mm broken by a total idiot in the field (he kicked down my tripod, the camera went down and the lens snapped at the mount). Brought it to the dealer in early December 2018. Got an estimate for repair on February 22. Got news that the lens was back at the dealer in early May. Since the 21mm is my workhorse, when I brought the broken one to the dealer I bought a new one to carry me over, and when the broken one got back (as new, I have to say - not one single scratch, completely rebuilt, AF and diaphragm tested, etc etc) I sold one of the two. It did cost me a lot, and the idiot run away without taking responsibility, but at least I could work for the months I was waiting. So, about 5 months without a lens: granted, they had to practically rebuild it, Christmas & Easter got in the way, etc. But still 5 months. Lesson learnt: don't let anyone closer than 5 feet from my tripod, especially if you don't know them, you never know how clumsy they might be.

Second. I lost the eyepiece cover of one of my two X1D bodies - my fault this time, I knocked it off on the seaside, and it was gone in the ocean before I could grab it. I noticed the dealer on March 29. He ordered the spare part from the distributor the next day. On May 10, having heard nothing, I asked the dealer. Same day, the distributor tells him that they would order it and it would take 20 working days to get it: basically, they didn't do diddle when the dealer first ordered it. I contacted Hasselblad Sweden directly, they were extremely helpful and sped things up, the spare piece arrived to my dealer in 11 days (not working days, just days). I got a call from the Hasselblad rep in Italy to apologise for the delay, and for the delay of the 135mm I ordered. So, great support from the dealer, bad support from the distributor, great support from Hasselblad Sweden and from Hasselblad Italy. Total wait: 50 days, more or less. Lesson learnt: trust the dealer, involve Hasselblad Sweden, involve Hasselblad's Italian rep, don't trust the distributor.

So, my take is this. There are so many parts in the customer service chain, that:

1. It is difficult to know which part (and who) is responsible for a delay;
2. If any of the steps involved delays things just by one working day or two, you end up with months of wait;
3. In this day and age, when no camera manufacturers (and most manufacturers of anything) keeps stock of spares (of anything, really) anymore, pretty much all manufacturer are in the same boat when it comes to speed in repairing things;

To me, there are two solutions that could easily enough be implemented to fix this:

1. It is clear from this thread and the million other similar thread online that what makes a difference - and what Leica and everyone else should work on, if they didn't already - is the support net that should be built around that to make sure that we can keep working while they sort things out for us: i.e., loner programs, professional programs, and the like;
2. Build extremely reliable products, that at least won't need servicing for manufacturing defects. This should free a lot of repairmen & customer service energy to take care of accidents, user errors, and so on. Leica started being reliable with the SL, M10 and CL, and considering that it's the first of a new line of product Hasselblad did good enough with the X1D, a camera that seems to be extremely reliable except for some complains about the battery door in the first batches, complains that seem to have been fixed during the production run.

Just my .02 of course. Best regards,

Vieri
 

Godfrey

Well-known member
Good thoughts, Vieri.

I find it is always best to be self-sufficient, to count on dealers, distributors, or manufacturers for assistance as little as possible. I've had very good experiences with my Leica equipment, and very good experiences with Leica USA when I've needed their services ... and part of that is that I don't expect anything: I harbor no sense of entitlement simply because I've spent a lot of money. I spent the money for the gear, and I got it, and it works as I expected and paid for—thank you. The rest—I deal with it when there's a problem. Usually the dealer, distributor, or manufacturer have a solution that suits me. I make personal relationships with the dealers I do business with, I give them what they want (recognition, sales, a bit of word of mouth marketing) ... the others, well, it's hard for a single person to have enough of a voice to matter to a corporate entity. I recognize that and set my expectations appropriately.

When I was a working pro, for some years I had a relationship with one of the majors. They provided me with equipment, I provided them with photos, product endorsements, etc etc. When I tried to get to something more, well, corporate think is corporate think. They left me with the equipment they had "loaned" me and moved on. I was upset by that for a short time, then I reflected on it and came to the conclusion that they'd done all right by me, and I had simply not understood the relationship well enough. It was all money: dollars vs marketing, no amount of personal relationship made any difference to that relationship. Such it is. I brought that new understanding to my next full-time regular job and it did me very well—better than my previous misunderstanding had done. Such it is.

Life's too short to waste energy on ranting and raving. I remember this on a plaque in my grandfather's workshop: "We grow too soon old and too late smart." It has gained new meaning for me as I race towards being an old man at the pace of Time. Thanks, grandpa. :D

I think I'll scan my latest Polaroid prints today... :angel:

G
 

Ai_Print

Active member
I'm pretty much done buying anything new in digital Leica, but for a slightly different reason. I have an M10 and while everything else on it is pretty much perfect, the shutter noise for a lot of the work I do is simply not. It's almost as harsh as the M9 was so I am always really surprised at how many heads it turns in low key documentary situations.

So I had really been looking forward to getting the shutter upgraded because I don't feel like handing over $8,000 for an M10P to get the shutter they should have put in the camera in the first place. But when I recently learned that you either pay $1,395 for everything but the shutter and then $2,995 for the whole thing including the shutter, well this is truly my last dance with this greedy company.

Even though they are larger cameras overall, Nikon Z mirrorless cameras and the lenses are simply walking all over the Leica M10 for discrete work, it's no contest. Having a completely silent shutter is such a subconscious game changer for me it is mind boggling. So a few days ago I took that $3K that Leica was asking to fix their stupid shutter and put it toward my third Z body.

I'll keep the M10 and maybe I will buy a used M10-P down the road but I will *never* pay Leica for a new digital body ever again.
 

Godfrey

Well-known member
I'm pretty much done buying anything new in digital Leica, but for a slightly different reason. I have an M10 and while everything else on it is pretty much perfect, the shutter noise for a lot of the work I do is simply not. It's almost as harsh as the M9 was so I am always really surprised at how many heads it turns in low key documentary situations.

So I had really been looking forward to getting the shutter upgraded because I don't feel like handing over $8,000 for an M10P to get the shutter they should have put in the camera in the first place. But when I recently learned that you either pay $1,395 for everything but the shutter and then $2,995 for the whole thing including the shutter, well this is truly my last dance with this greedy company.

Even though they are larger cameras overall, Nikon Z mirrorless cameras and the lenses are simply walking all over the Leica M10 for discrete work, it's no contest. Having a completely silent shutter is such a subconscious game changer for me it is mind boggling. So a few days ago I took that $3K that Leica was asking to fix their stupid shutter and put it toward my third Z body.

I'll keep the M10 and maybe I will buy a used M10-P down the road but I will *never* pay Leica for a new digital body ever again.
But you knew that when you bought the M10. Didn't you? I knew exactly how noisy the M9, M-P 240, and M-D 262 were long before I bought them, and I've done "discrete" work with even a Nikon F in the past, which sounds more like a gunshot going off than a camera's shutter firing. Nobody ever noticed when I took photographs anyway.

G
 

jdphoto

Well-known member
It's well known that camera companies hold back certain features to be incorporated in future models, but Leica's prices for upgrades are an affront to common sensibilities. Their avarice will be their undoing.
I sold my Q, Monochrom, and CL as a result of practical use and utility. What I like about the Nikon Z is the ability to adapt M and R lenses (preferably Mandler designs) to the short flange and wide diameter of the Z7, which imo, is a superior camera. Leica is known for fantastic lenses, but the Z comes with a silent shutter, touch screen and level at no additional cost. I'll continue to shoot with my Leica M2-R for now, as that was the pinnacle of Leica design and precision.
 
Last edited:

Shashin

Well-known member
It's well known that camera companies hold back certain features to be incorporated in future models, ...
Really? Where does this come from? I worked for a camera company. We would want to include new features for a number of reasons, to distinguish our products from competitor's and to be first to the market. Old new features were not very useful. I would chalk that idea up to urban myth.
 

jdphoto

Well-known member
Really? Where does this come from? I worked for a camera company. We would want to include new features for a number of reasons, to distinguish our products from competitor's and to be first to the market. Old new features were not very useful. I would chalk that idea up to urban myth.
Yeah, I think it's obvious what Leica does with their "upgrades". With the perceived pinnacle of digital tech and design apparent in most every other camera, you expect consumers to believe that Leica couldn't figure out a spirit level and silent shutter in the 1st gen. M10? Really? Only to be featured in the groundbreaking newer M10? Touchscreens and lack of logos on the front complete the upgrade for a more discreet photo experience. What's next, a custom hot shoe cover?
 

Shashin

Well-known member
Yeah, I think it's obvious what Leica does with their "upgrades". With the perceived pinnacle of digital tech and design apparent in most every other camera, you expect consumers to believe that Leica couldn't figure out a spirit level and silent shutter in the 1st gen. M10? Really? Only to be featured in the groundbreaking newer M10? Touchscreens and lack of logos on the front complete the upgrade for a more discreet photo experience. What's next, a custom hot shoe cover?
Well, it is not obvious unless you have some inside track on the conversations. Leica is a notoriously conservative camera manufacturer, and mostly to do with its customer base. Not everything is a conspiracy. Given their track record of product problems, I would not assume a grand master plan is at work.
 

jdphoto

Well-known member
Well, it is not obvious unless you have some inside track on the conversations. Leica is a notoriously conservative camera manufacturer, and mostly to do with its customer base. Not everything is a conspiracy. Given their track record of product problems, I would not assume a grand master plan is at work.
By being conservative in the "moderation or caution" definition, I'd say that hasn't bode too well for their engineering department give the number of recalls of deficient camera products. Not everything is a conspiracy indeed. I'd bet a segment of the loyal customer base is more than just a little annoyed of the minimal upgrade features that almost every other camera on the market includes. Boutique customers don't drive innovation, just the price of upgrades.
 

Godfrey

Well-known member
By being conservative in the "moderation or caution" definition, I'd say that hasn't bode too well for their engineering department give the number of recalls of deficient camera products. Not everything is a conspiracy indeed. I'd bet a segment of the loyal customer base is more than just a little annoyed of the minimal upgrade features that almost every other camera on the market includes. Boutique customers don't drive innovation, just the price of upgrades.
Some of us "boutique customers" don't give a rat's patootie for all the gizmos that you seem to feel are lacking. We buy the cameras to make photographs, and like them just as they are.

As I've said repeatedly, I've had better performance and reliability with my Leica cameras than with nearly any other camera I've owned with the possible exception of my Olympus cameras. And service that has been just as good when service was needed. And lens/imaging quality that has been, by and large, at the top tier of anything available from anyone.

All this dyspepsia and the myopic view that a couple of Leica M and S model problems are "everything about Leica" is just such a waste of energy and excess emotion to me. If you don't like the products, say so and then sell them, don't buy them again, and don't linger around whining about them. Buy something that you like and that you think does better, and go use it.

G
 

iiiNelson

Well-known member
Oh crap... This looks like a Sony thread from a few years ago... well I said they were the "new Leica" based on how people kept responding.

In any case, I think most of the points and feedback have been made and I think we can conclude that if fast turnaround times of repairs are a necessity for your business/professional usage then this is probably only a brand to consider for personal projects (which technically can be professional) or personal use. There are naturally exceptions to every rule but yes take the frequency of commonly faulty products seriously. That doesn't mean that everything they make will break but I'd stay away from their CCD based products and maybe wouldn't buy their S lenses used for fear it may have an old motor in them.

Now that this is solved then maybe we can all move on from this thread. I feel for the OP (I've kinda been there) but it's just a camera... dump it (assuming your dealer would issue a refund or a fair buy back price for a refurb) and choose something that works better for you.
 

jdphoto

Well-known member
Oh crap... This looks like a Sony thread from a few years ago... well I said they were the "new Leica" based on how people kept responding.

In any case, I think most of the points and feedback have been made and I think we can conclude that if fast turnaround times of repairs are a necessity for your business/professional usage then this is probably only a brand to consider for personal projects (which technically can be professional) or personal use. There are naturally exceptions to every rule but yes take the frequency of commonly faulty products seriously. That doesn't mean that everything they make will break but I'd stay away from their CCD based products and maybe wouldn't buy their S lenses used for fear it may have an old motor in them.

Now that this is solved then maybe we can all move on from this thread. I feel for the OP (I've kinda been there) but it's just a camera... dump it (assuming your dealer would issue a refund or a fair buy back price for a refurb) and choose something that works better for you.
Great points. I'm sure the OP has switched gear from Leica considering what he's put into it. I've never had any issues with Leica digital other than the cheap plastic crap of the CL lenses. I sold all my Leica digital gear in favor of just the film versions. The Leica lenses, as others have mentioned, are the best! I did have many issues with Hasselblad MFD, but decided that today's FF cameras when adapting M and R lenses are just as good for a majority of our work.
The OP has a right to be miffed, especially if you make photography your career. Input from non professional photographers should consider his investment and the emotional considerations that brings. Constructive input might help to alleviate his concerns. What works for me has no bearing on his current situation, but if others had more empathy the threads might be more civil. Leica should want his business because social media is a powerful tool for potential customers.
 
Last edited:

Godfrey

Well-known member
Professionals don't stamp their feet and get miffed like children because some manufacturers' equipment and some dealers have failed for them. They just move on to equipment that gets the job done and don't waste time blowing hot air. The time and money involved in equipment management required to do your job is a business expense, not a personal/emotional thing.

Yes, I was a professional photographer too, prior to retiring. Never saw any purpose to complaining about stuff that failed on me. I just stopped using it when getting satisfaction from a dealer/vendor didn't happen, sold it, and went to other equipment that worked. Frankly, that's why I ended up with Leica gear: it does the job I wanted, and want still.

I see no reason to convince people of anything. Convince yourself to do the sensible thing, whatever that might be for you and your photography, and act like a professional.

G
 

iiiNelson

Well-known member
Professionals don't stamp their feet and get miffed like children because some manufacturers' equipment and some dealers have failed for them. They just move on to equipment that gets the job done and don't waste time blowing hot air. The time and money involved in equipment management required to do your job is a business expense, not a personal/emotional thing.

Yes, I was a professional photographer too, prior to retiring. Never saw any purpose to complaining about stuff that failed on me. I just stopped using it when getting satisfaction from a dealer/vendor didn't happen, sold it, and went to other equipment that worked. Frankly, that's why I ended up with Leica gear: it does the job I wanted, and want still.

I see no reason to convince people of anything. Convince yourself to do the sensible thing, whatever that might be for you and your photography, and act like a professional.

G
I guess that all depends on the professional and their market. I’d assume that unreliable gear might elicit a strongly worded letter/email if the catastrophe is large enough. Perhaps it would push them to research their issue to see if others have experienced the same to see if they’re the exception that got a bit of bad luck or if they’re experiencing a common enough problem that they should divest themselves from their gear.

Again voicing what ALL professional do or how ALL professionals would react is a bit presumptuous in stating that they all react the same way that you or people you know would. I don’t know that getting miffed over the reliability of 10’s of thousands of dollars of camera equipment is acting like a child so much as it is genuine concern/anger that a product that has a certain heritage and reputation isn’t as seemingly reliable as gear in the same price range or lower price range.

So yes, it COULD be a business expense but you still have to work consistently in order to pay off those business expenses. If your equipment is in Germany for months well then it’s potentially costing you money (whether you have to buy an additional backup or buy into another system if you can’t afford the 3rd Leica body) when the bills are still due. Photography is a side job for me and I make a much higher salary at my day job so I understand that I have a level of flexibility in choosing my gear that I wouldn't pretend most full-time working photographers have.

In the USA the average full-time photographer is making less than $50k a year and let’s assume the high-end ones are making high 5 figures to low 6 figures. Adding a Leica isn’t an insignificant cost for most so no need to minimize a person voicing their concerns. I truly hope you don’t have a terrible service experience. Like I’ve said - I didn’t have a bad service experience myself but having 2 cameras that retailed for $14k both fail does not give me a warm and fuzzy for Pro work. I’d sooner take a CaNikoSonyFuji (and did for value purposes above all else) for that personally if the goal is to make money and maybe have a Leica M for personal use. For the cost of a M body you could get a couple of bodies and the 24-200/2.8 equivalent zoom lenses for any system and have a working kit and a personal M kit. That's not to say none of those other cameras can break. They can and will eventually but the price to re-entry is much lower and the service likely wouldn’t take months to fix in reality.

Once again, my posts aren't to disparage Leica as a company. I myself like some of their products without a doubt but let's not pretend that every brand doesn't have perceived shortcomings from an individual point of view. For the record this was originally about one person's experiences... others have shared similar experiences. I'm not one to make a judgment on the company as a whole as many people like yourself are quite satisfied with their Leica gear... nothing wrong with that at all but it's also fair for people that have been "burned" to ask the questions too.
 
Last edited:

Ai_Print

Active member
I voiced my opinion as a community member, if the fact I want to rely on this equipment as a successful professional somehow takes me out of calibration for that then maybe I am expecting too much from this site as well?

I only had about 20 minutes with the M10 when I checked it out in Tamarkin, I did wonder about the shutter noise but did not get a firm grasp on how it would play out in the real world until I got one and used it on jobs. Only then did it become much more apparent. I am going to live with the camera as is and that will be easier now that I have taken it out of the critical role that I originally bought it for.

So in some ways I have moved on, have nothing else to complain about. I saw this thread when looking for more beta on the upgrade terms. I responded to it not in a Leica hate way but in sheer surprise at the price to make this camera the best it can be. I still love the brand and the Leica RF experience, used it on a job today.

But I also said my peace and I am now at peace with it and wish them the best of luck.
 

jdphoto

Well-known member
I guess that all depends on the professional and their market. I’d assume that unreliable gear might elicit a strongly worded letter/email if the catastrophe is large enough. Perhaps it would push them to research their issue to see if others have experienced the same to see if they’re the exception that got a bit of bad luck or if they’re experiencing a common enough problem that they should divest themselves from their gear.

Again voicing what ALL professional do or how ALL professionals would react is a bit presumptuous in stating that they all react the same way that you or people you know would. I don’t know that getting miffed over the reliability of 10’s of thousands of dollars of camera equipment is acting like a child so much as it is genuine concern/anger that a product that has a certain heritage and reputation isn’t as seemingly reliable as gear in the same price range or lower price range.

So yes, it COULD be a business expense but you still have to work consistently in order to pay off those business expenses. If your equipment is in Germany for months well then it’s potentially costing you money (whether you have to buy an additional backup or buy into another system if you can’t afford the 3rd Leica body) when the bills are still due. Photography is a side job for me and I make a much higher salary at my day job so I understand that I have a level of flexibility in choosing my gear that I wouldn't pretend most full-time working photographers have.

In the USA the average full-time photographer is making less than $50k a year and let’s assume the high-end ones are making high 5 figures to low 6 figures. Adding a Leica isn’t an insignificant cost for most so no need to minimize a person voicing their concerns. I truly hope you don’t have a terrible service experience. Like I’ve said - I didn’t have a bad service experience myself but having 2 cameras that retailed for $14k both fail does not give me a warm and fuzzy for Pro work. I’d sooner take a CaNikoSonyFuji (and did for value purposes above all else) for that personally if the goal is to make money and maybe have a Leica M for personal use. For the cost of a M body you could get a couple of bodies and the 24-200/2.8 equivalent zoom lenses for any system and have a working kit and a personal M kit. That's not to say none of those other cameras can break. They can and will eventually but the price to re-entry is much lower and the service likely wouldn’t take months to fix in reality.

Once again, my posts aren't to disparage Leica as a company. I myself like some of their products without a doubt but let's not pretend that every brand doesn't have perceived shortcomings from an individual point of view. For the record this was originally about one person's experiences... others have shared similar experiences. I'm not one to make a judgment on the company as a whole as many people like yourself are quite satisfied with their Leica gear... nothing wrong with that at all but it's also fair for people that have been "burned" to ask the questions too.
Nicely written! :clap:
 

Godfrey

Well-known member
...
In the USA the average full-time photographer is making less than $50k a year and let’s assume the high-end ones are making high 5 figures to low 6 figures. ...
LOL! If you're a free-lance photographer or a single-person shop making less than $50K per year from your business, the very notion of spending $14K for a couple of pieces of equipment is so absurd it isn't worth considering. MOST professional photographers in that situation buy the cheapest gear that will get the job done—and for most such jobs handled by $50K/annum photographers the nuanced excellence of a Leica lens compared to the already excellent rendering of a good CaNiFuPenSoOlyPan lens is completely irrelevant: The buyers don't see it.

This is what I mean by acting like a professional. A professional MUST have backup and MUST buy equipment in keeping with the profitability of their business because their viability as a business depends on it. If you're making <$50K per year, you spend as little as possible on your gear and as much as you can afford marketing your work. A part-time "pro" photographer that makes a little money now and then from their photography, and has a generous stable income doing something else, can afford to buy high end gear because the cost of the gear is hardly reckoned into the cost of doing business. (Note that the Olympus professional program requires that you make something like 80% or more of your total income from photography with Olympus gear, and requires documentation to prove that.)

faberryman said: "But you are trying so hard."
LOL again! Do you not understand that I am retired now and this entire forum is nothing more than idle chit-chat to pass the time in a pleasant manner, conversing with other idle photography-interested people, when I'm not otherwise busy? It has zero weight to me.

If I were still a working pro, I wouldn't have the time to waste on this discussion at all. :D

G
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top