Site Sponsors
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: S90 vx LX3 comparison

  1. #1
    Senior Member Rawfa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Rio de Janeiro
    Posts
    2,393
    Post Thanks / Like

    S90 vx LX3 comparison

    This is from a spanish website I read daily. According to the review it's a pretty fair fight with no clear winner. Shooting raw at iso 1600 the LX3's files look sharper but with more noise, while the S90's look less sharper but also have less noise. At iso 3200 the LX3 has really A LOT of noise, while the S90 looks like with some work it could become usable. The dynamic range seems to be visibly better on the S90. Man, I'm dying to test drive the S90!

    http://www.quesabesde.com/noticias/c...arativa,1_5784
    Last edited by Rawfa; 30th October 2009 at 03:06.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Rawfa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Rio de Janeiro
    Posts
    2,393
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: S90 vx LX3 comparison

    Here is the google translate version in english:

    http://translate.google.com/translat...istory_state0=

  3. #3
    Thawley
    Guest

    Re: S90 vx LX3 comparison

    Michael Reichmann posted his thoughts on the subject over at Luminous-Landscape.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •