S
simon_t
Guest
David Paul,
Thank you making and sharing those comparison shots! Inspecting them in Lightroom, I must say that I am less than impressed by the GRDII's performance. It is outclassed by the GX100 on every shot (except for barrel distortion) and the G9 does a little better as well.
Of course, the tests are not very well controlled, but the results are consistent across all three images. That would fit with 'real-world' use. Guessing for causes, I can come up with:
- bad GRDII support by Lightroom (did people use another converter as well?)
- AF problems in the GRDII (but on the street shot, 'real' focus wasn't achieved anywhere)
- Sample variation/bad lens
Or... maybe the GX100 is an exceptional bargain?
By the way, Sean, I fully agree with your comments on valuing test results.
Cheers,
Simon
Thank you making and sharing those comparison shots! Inspecting them in Lightroom, I must say that I am less than impressed by the GRDII's performance. It is outclassed by the GX100 on every shot (except for barrel distortion) and the G9 does a little better as well.
Of course, the tests are not very well controlled, but the results are consistent across all three images. That would fit with 'real-world' use. Guessing for causes, I can come up with:
- bad GRDII support by Lightroom (did people use another converter as well?)
- AF problems in the GRDII (but on the street shot, 'real' focus wasn't achieved anywhere)
- Sample variation/bad lens
Or... maybe the GX100 is an exceptional bargain?
By the way, Sean, I fully agree with your comments on valuing test results.
Cheers,
Simon
Last edited: