Photon-hunter
New member
As sold as I thought I was regarding the GX-100 I made the mistake of handling a LX-2 in the store...I really liked it. Love the thing, and must say that the 16:9 stuff is very appealing. Making a decission was allready hard enough as to include the Leica in the equation...
Having seen/handled both (D-Lux 3 and LX-2) I must say I prefer the Panasonic. Don´t ask me why, It simple feels beter in my hand.Go figure. I would like to know if anybody could coment on the "real world" differences between this two cameras. If we leave aside the bundled software and the extra year of warranty of the Leica are there really great diferences? Much has been said about the differences in the JPEG results, but, shooting RAW, would there be any differences in the files fom this little machines? Are the JPEG´s from the Leica really superior?
Just an extra question: Is the Silkypìx software provided with the Panasonic a full version or is it a "crippled" bunble version?
Thanks in advance for all your kindness and patience..
Erik.
Having seen/handled both (D-Lux 3 and LX-2) I must say I prefer the Panasonic. Don´t ask me why, It simple feels beter in my hand.Go figure. I would like to know if anybody could coment on the "real world" differences between this two cameras. If we leave aside the bundled software and the extra year of warranty of the Leica are there really great diferences? Much has been said about the differences in the JPEG results, but, shooting RAW, would there be any differences in the files fom this little machines? Are the JPEG´s from the Leica really superior?
Just an extra question: Is the Silkypìx software provided with the Panasonic a full version or is it a "crippled" bunble version?
Thanks in advance for all your kindness and patience..
Erik.