MHC
New member
outlook of G11, also has a comparison with G10, E-P1 and DP1. Outlook only.
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/pview/20090824_310026.html
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/pview/20090824_310026.html
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
If only it had a bigger sensor - the body is larger than the E-P1.outlook of G11, also has a comparison with G10, E-P1 and DP1. Outlook only.
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/pview/20090824_310026.html
Good point.Interesting to note: While the S90 has a stop brighter lens on the wide end, the G11 has quite an advantage on the long end where it matters more. f/4.5 at 140 mm likely means close to f/4.0 at 105mm where the S/90 is f.4.9.
Thanks but it didn't at all for me. The buildings in the photos I had taken still looked like flacid penises. Far beyond anything I have seen in ANY camera I have owned before, it could very well have been a defective camera, who knows...Neil, that may have been premature, if I can offer comment: the supplied DPP corrects that distortion extremely well. cheers, kl