Site Sponsors
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 56

Thread: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    413
    Post Thanks / Like

    Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Just announced at PMA...

    http://news.sel.sony.com/images/larg...SLR_onp_lg.jpg

    No delivery date yet

  2. #2
    Member picman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    139
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    YES!

  3. #3
    Member roanjoh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    213
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Very nice!!!

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    413
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    From the press release:

    Shown in advanced pre-production form at PMA is the Distagon T* 24mm f/2 ZA SSM Carl Zeiss wide angle lens. Scheduled for launch in 2010, this bright, wide angle prime is an ideal choice for reportage, naturally lit interiors and other quality-critical handheld shooting applications.

    Another picture here: (together with the upcoming 500 mm f 4.0)

    http://a.img-dpreview.com/news/1002/...010_Sony_3.jpg

  5. #5
    Senior Member Eoin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Dublin / Ireland
    Posts
    410
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Well!, I'm delighted to read the news, it shows they are moving in the right direction. However, considering this focal length is covered twice over in my 16-35 and 24-70 and it's a stop faster, I'm still unlikely to purchase this. A 50 f:/1.2 would have been a no brainer for me.
    A7II, FE 35, 55 C/Y 18, 28, 85, 100, 28-85

  6. #6
    Subscriber and Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,800
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by Eoin View Post
    Well!, I'm delighted to read the news, it shows they are moving in the right direction. However, considering this focal length is covered twice over in my 16-35 and 24-70 and it's a stop faster, I'm still unlikely to purchase this. A 50 f:/1.2 would have been a no brainer for me.
    However, I wonder that since it competes with neither the 20f28 nor the 28f28 Sony ok'd its release.

    Personally 21, 35 or macro would have seemed more desirable....if it is flawless I will add it but the 24 - 70 seems fairly good.

    Bob

  7. #7
    Senior Member douglasf13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, USA
    Posts
    1,965
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    A 50 1.2 would have been a no-brainer for me, too.

    The ZA 24 makes sense to me, though. It's quite a bit smaller than the zooms, and it should be much cheaper, too. It'll be a good 35mm equivalent for APS-C users, and a good, small-ish, fast-ish 24mm prime for fullframe users. I'd be shocked if the 24 doesn't have outstanding IQ (my 2470 isn't exactly perfect at 24mm.)

  8. #8
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Bill Caulfeild-Browne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Bruce Peninsula, Canada
    Posts
    2,535
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    184

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Well, the 24 is of no interest to me, but the 500 f4 is exactly what I've been waiting for!
    But.......when? I've seen this picture for well over a year now...
    Bill

  9. #9
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Done deal for me. I'll take anything Zeiss they make.

    Contrary to every one else ... my hope had been for a Zeiss 35/1.4

    What is it with these companies? First Nikon, then Sony/Zeiss 24mm primes ... doesn't anyone get how important a fast 35mm is?

    -Marc

  10. #10
    Subscriber and Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,800
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    I am with you on this one Marc....

    I will buy the Sony 35 1.4 and the ZA 24 2.0 and wait for more Zeiss primes.

    Bob

  11. #11
    Senior Member douglasf13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, USA
    Posts
    1,965
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    This all leads me to wonder what to expect in the future from Sony and Zeiss. Judging by the current lineup, and by what reps have said, it seems that Sony isn't intending to release a full Zeiss lineup (at least anytime soon,) but, rather, fill in gaps, which I personally think is not the right move. So now, in regards to fullframe primes, we have:

    16 fish
    20 2.8
    24 2 ZA
    28 2.8
    35 1.4 G
    50 1.4
    50 2.8 macro
    85 1.4 ZA
    100 2.8 macro
    135 1.8 ZA
    135 stf
    300 2.8 G
    500 4 G

    So now, outside of T/S**, I wonder where they'll go next. It seems a 200mm (maybe macro, maybe both) is the logical next move, and that has been rumored. What do you think? I have a feeling it'll be a LONG time before I see any kind of ZA 50mm prime.

    **lately, an interesting new Sony patent application for a tilt lens with AF surfaced.

  12. #12
    Subscriber and Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,800
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
    This all leads me to wonder what to expect in the future from Sony and Zeiss. Judging by the current lineup, and by what reps have said, it seems that Sony isn't intending to release a full Zeiss lineup (at least anytime soon,) but, rather, fill in gaps, which I personally think is not the right move. So now, in regards to fullframe primes, we have:

    16 fish
    20 2.8
    24 2 ZA
    28 2.8
    35 1.4 G
    50 1.4
    50 2.8 macro
    85 1.4 ZA
    100 2.8 macro
    135 1.8 ZA
    135 stf
    300 2.8 G
    500 4 G

    So now, outside of T/S**, I wonder where they'll go next. It seems a 200mm (maybe macro, maybe both) is the logical next move, and that has been rumored. What do you think? I have a feeling it'll be a LONG time before I see any kind of ZA 50mm prime.

    **lately, an interesting new Sony patent application for a tilt lens with AF surfaced.

    I am new to this game but think you may be correct...such a shame.

    Bob

  13. #13
    Senior Member douglasf13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, USA
    Posts
    1,965
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Granted, a user on another forum mentioned that he saw some presentation from a Sony rep a few days ago, and he hinted that Sony would be bringing a ton of midrange lenses next year. I could deal with a ZA 50 f2. My point above is that I don't expect Sony to duplicate lenses exactly, like a 35mm 1.4 or 50mm 1.4

  14. #14
    Subscriber and Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,800
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
    Granted, a user on another forum mentioned that he saw some presentation from a Sony rep a few days ago, and he hinted that Sony would be bringing a ton of midrange lenses next year. I could deal with a ZA 50 f2. My point above is that I don't expect Sony to duplicate lenses exactly, like a 35mm 1.4 or 50mm 1.4
    I concur...hope we are both wrong. Corporate think tends to take the most conservative route.

    Bob

  15. #15
    Senior Member douglasf13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, USA
    Posts
    1,965
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    On a more positive note, I just saw this.

    "In a wide-ranging interview, Mr Imamura also told us that the company’s relationship with Carl Zeiss will extend to lenses designed for the mirrorless interchangeable lens camera, unveiled at this year’s PMA. However, he refused to be drawn on details of the upcoming camera’s specification, beyond what has already been made public. "

    http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/870072/1#8160332

    I'm into the idea of a small aps-c cam with a zeiss prime.

  16. #16
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    6,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1145

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Granted my needs are different than Marc's or other shooters who really like to work with primes, like Eion the 16-35 and 24-70 have me well covered at 24 and I don't really need that extra stop at that focal.

  17. #17
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by TEBnewyork View Post
    Granted my needs are different than Marc's or other shooters who really like to work with primes, like Eion the 16-35 and 24-70 have me well covered at 24 and I don't really need that extra stop at that focal.
    Don't get me wrong, If there wasn't a ZA24-70/2.8 and ZA16-35/2.8 I may have not gone the Sony A900 route. Coupled with the Sony 70-200/2.8G APO and 1.4X extender, all aspects of wedding coverage or action type shooting are handled ...which is the only reason I have any DSLR at all.

    The ZA primes simply offer creative choice.

    Actually, there are some aspects of the ZA24/2 as yet unknown that could determine whether I add it to the bag ... price, distortion and CA control, vignetting, closest focusing distance, and Bokeh. Close focusing @ f/2 will be different from f/2.8 depending on how close the new 24 will focus.

    These days about 1/2 of my wedding work is done with a M9 and fast aperture M optics ... 24/1.4ASPH, 50/0.95 Noctilux, 75/1.4 German for example.

    So, in reality, what I need from Sony/Zeiss are lenses that specifically are DSLR territory ... Zooms, Macros, T/S options, longer lenses.

    One of the most valuable 35mm DSLR lenses I ever used was the Nikon 90/2.8 T/S Macro. Tilt was invaluable for DOF. Once you use one of those, any regular 100mm Macro just doesn't cut it.

    Other than the slower WATE and MATE, there are no quasi zooms for M work nor is there anything above 135mm ... and the Medium Format Zooms are huge, slow and impractical for spontaneous work.

  18. #18
    Senior Member dhsimmonds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hampshire, UK
    Posts
    904
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    20

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    I share Marc's conservative approach to the 24/F2 ZA lens. Most of all I shall be looking for vignetting which is a known for the 24-70 at 24mm.

    Perhaps this lens as a prime has re-dressed this situation as 24mm is a useful FL to have for so many different subjects. Amazingly, the 16-35 ZA displays no vignetting at any FL.
    Cheers, Dave
    www.simmondsphotography.com

  19. #19
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    jonoslack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Anglia & Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    11,778
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Dave - will you PERLEASE stop saying how good the 16-35 is. I really don't need to know .
    I hope there are more of these primes too - this one isn't for me, but it's nice to see it there. Interesting that Zeiss will be making lenses for their little camera. I still think it sad that Leica aren't more involved with m4/3 - the 45 macro is such a splendid lens.

    all thebest

    Just this guy you know

  20. #20
    Senior Member edwardkaraa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    1,470
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    I find the new 24/2 to be in line with the new Zeiss philosophy that we see in the ZE/ZF line. Zeiss wants to avoid super wide apertures that can produce less than optimal results and want to give us a small compact lens with a maximum aperture that you can use without any second thoughts about the image quality. I expect this 24/2 to be great wide open and only improve in contrast and DOF when stopped down, similarly to the ZE/ZF cousins.

    Even though I have both zooms, I will purchase the 24 for sure especially if it is as good as I expect it to be. The zooms are well, zooms. Good for reportage and many other applications, but not the best for landscapes and site photography that I like to do. I would have loved to see a 100 macro and a fast 35 and 50, but maybe they will come later this year.
    M262 ZM 25/2.8 35/1.4 50/2 85/2

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    384
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    I almost got this 24/1.4 because of my hunger for wide primes...and yes this is the one for me. I am a bit tired carrying 24-70 with a850 all day long so I am trying out 24-50/4. Well done Sony

  22. #22
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    6,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1145

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by dhsimmonds View Post
    I share Marc's conservative approach to the 24/F2 ZA lens. Most of all I shall be looking for vignetting which is a known for the 24-70 at 24mm.

    Perhaps this lens as a prime has re-dressed this situation as 24mm is a useful FL to have for so many different subjects. Amazingly, the 16-35 ZA displays no vignetting at any FL.
    Yeah, I just added the 16-35 for that reason. I needed polarizer and NDs last summer and really couldn't use the 24-70 down at 24 in some situations. If I needed to stack the filters I was easily into the 35mm range. Heading to the Salton Sea next week and I will see what my go to lens will be.

  23. #23
    Senior Member ryc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Or-Y-Gun
    Posts
    548
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Well, I for one will get it. I try to stock up on all exotic or good lenses. Unlike cameras, the lenses dont get dated in a year like most dslr's. Lenses are good for a very long time. And who knows, maybe 10 years from now, people will be paying big bucks for a zeiss za lens to adapt to some new camera thats not even out yet Remember the 21 distagon was sellingupwards of 4k at one point.

  24. #24
    bruderadler
    Guest

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
    So now, outside of T/S**, I wonder where they'll go next. It seems a 200mm (maybe macro, maybe both) is the logical next move, and that has been rumored. What do you think? I have a feeling it'll be a LONG time before I see any kind of ZA 50mm prime.

    **lately, an interesting new Sony patent application for a tilt lens with AF surfaced.
    Minolta introduced in 1998 AF 200/4 APO Tele Macro which is excellent (I owned it once). I can imagine it can easily be taken into production again.

  25. #25
    Senior Member douglasf13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, USA
    Posts
    1,965
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Agreed. The lack of a 200mm prime is a glaring hole in the current line-up, and I wonder which way they'll go with it?

  26. #26
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,871
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    What is so special about a 2/24 ???

    Canon has a 1.4/24 as well as Nikon since recently. And both are outstanding designs, not a bit second to Zeiss for Sony.

  27. #27
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,871
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
    Agreed. The lack of a 200mm prime is a glaring hole in the current line-up, and I wonder which way they'll go with it?
    Just go for Canon or Nikon and you are done

  28. #28
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by ptomsu View Post
    What is so special about a 2/24 ???

    Canon has a 1.4/24 as well as Nikon since recently. And both are outstanding designs, not a bit second to Zeiss for Sony.
    If you have to ask ... well ...

  29. #29
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by ptomsu View Post
    Just go for Canon or Nikon and you are done
    No thanks, I already "Done" with Canon and Nikon ...

    Marc

  30. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Boulder Creek, Ca.
    Posts
    388
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    α900+VG|F20|2xF58|16-35,24-70,135Z|STF|70-400G|50,85 1.4|16,20,28,100M,80-200APO f/2.8|28-135|500f/8|1x-3xMacro|2xMFC-1000|Tiltall+RRS, Bellows, etc.

  31. #31
    Senior Member douglasf13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, USA
    Posts
    1,965
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by ptomsu View Post
    Just go for Canon or Nikon and you are done
    I didn't say a glaring hole for me. I generally don't shoot 100mm+ lenses, let alone 200mm.

  32. #32
    Tony Beach
    Guest

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by ptomsu View Post
    What is so special about a 2/24 ???

    Canon has a 1.4/24 as well as Nikon since recently. And both are outstanding designs, not a bit second to Zeiss for Sony.
    This forthcoming Zeiss might just keep me in the Sony camp. I'm very much looking forward to it. What's its advantage over an f/1.4 lens? It will probably cost about $1000 less and it will work on my A850.

    BTW Peter, stop trolling here. If you don't like Sony and want to sing the praises of Nikon (or whatever other brand), just go to one of those forums and do it there. Bashing a brand in its forums is tactless.

  33. #33
    Senior Member douglasf13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, USA
    Posts
    1,965
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Don't worry about Peter. He was doing the same with Canon when he left it for Sony last year, if I remember correctly. lol.

  34. #34
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Actually, all kidding aside, depending on priorities and finances, I don't see any reason to not be a bi-polar user ... LOL.


    Years ago, my mentor once laughed at my narrow, brand oriented affliction. His advice was simple ... "don't let the camera select the lenses, let the lenses select the camera".


    Which is exactly why I now primarily use a Sony A900 to get to the Zeiss lenses I've always favored, and a Leica M9 for fast prime wides and 50mm focal lengths.


    So, it is conceivable that one could select say Canon for example to fill the holes in the Sony line up. Like a 35/1.4L, 50/1.2L, a T/S lens (17 or 24mm?), or the new 100/2.8L IS Macro perhaps ... on a Canon 5D-MKII with Live View for the T/S and Macro applications. Plus the Canon could step in when faced with Low Light scenarios especially with the 50/1.2 and it's excellent flare control.


    Why not all Canon? ... personally, I hated Canon Zooms like the 24-70/2.8L ... the 85/1.2L was too big and slow focusing, and the 135/2L isn't IS (actually none of those lenses are IS).


    I know, not conventional thinking ... but at least it doesn't fan the flames of partisan Nikon/Canon/Sony/Pentax/Leica/Hasselbald/Mamiya/Contax arguments

    -Marc-
    Last edited by fotografz; 17th March 2010 at 02:05.

  35. #35
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Manchester/Jerusalem
    Posts
    2,652
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    290

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    .....
    Last edited by Ben Rubinstein; 17th March 2010 at 03:56.
    I am not a painter, nor an artist. Therefore I can see straight, and that may be my undoing. - Alfred Stieglitz

    Website: http://www.timelessjewishart.com

  36. #36
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Manchester/Jerusalem
    Posts
    2,652
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    290

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Not sure I agree Marc, there is the backup issue. If you need 3 specific lenses for a wedding (for example) then you need two camera bodies that they can use otherwise you have no backup. It's why I would steer very clear of dual systems unless they complimented each other throughout the range at which point it gets a bit silly (not suggesting that you have 2 Sonys and 2 M9's ). I've just had to fall back on backup so many times that I'm hugely senstive to it. Most people cannot afford dual backup on dual systems.
    Last edited by Ben Rubinstein; 17th March 2010 at 04:09.
    I am not a painter, nor an artist. Therefore I can see straight, and that may be my undoing. - Alfred Stieglitz

    Website: http://www.timelessjewishart.com

  37. #37
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Rubinstein View Post
    Not sure I agree Marc, there is the backup issue. If you need a 24 1.4 for a wedding (for example) then you need two camera bodies to hang it off otherwise you have no backup. It's why I would steer very clear of dual systems unless they complimented each other throughout the range at which point it gets a bit silly. I've just had to fall back on backup so many times that I'm hugely senstive to it.
    Well Ben ... not many wedding photographers here, so it can't be skewed that way for everyone. Plus, as I mentioned on the other thread, weddings aren't enough anymore and I believe it'll only get worse ... so my gear decisions aren't exclusively driven by weddings as much as in the past. More diverse applications is my criteria now.

    But your point is well taken, and most people would just stick with one system ... which is why the Zeiss 24/2 is so welcome.

    For the past few years prior to focusing on Sony I was a dual system user for weddings. The mainstay now is a Zeiss 24-70 zoom which in itself needs to be backed up. So, as a back-up I could get another Sony zoom (which I did), or the Canon with a 24-105/4 and fill in the holes in the Sony line up with some choice fast Canon primes, and have a lower light camera when needed.

    Actually, I'm not doing any of the above. I've focused almost exclusively on my Leica M9 kit ... and can see the day approaching where the only DSLR I'll have with me is a Sony A900/24-70 zoom and maybe a 135/2 (with a A900 back-up left in the truck) ... if even that.

    I started wedding photography with a couple of Ms alone, and would relish returning to that bolstered by a MFD like the Hassey H4D/40 to up my game for environmental portraiture, location commercial work, and also use it for more structured wedding shots with a 1/800th sync speed.

    Time will tell.

    -Marc

  38. #38
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,871
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Folks,

    not saying that Sony / Alpha is bad or anything.

    I for myself could not get nicely along with the operation of the A900 and also the Zeiss lenses did not feel as well in my hands as the corresponding Nikkors. This does not mean that I saw anything bad in the optical quality, but I also could not see anything improved compared to their Nikkor counterparts.

    As I was jumping into MF (H3D39) a few months ago, I have now a system with exceptional IQ at high resolution and I really do not need the 24MP DSLR any longer. I rather prefer a faster and for me more flexible system which is currently Nikon. And they did their homework with some great new glass available and in the pipeline.

    I missed these improvements at Sony so far, maybe they will come but I cannot see that happen anytime soon. Lenses like a 2/24 or similar are not what would make me buy into a prime, as long as I have a great and reasonably fast zoom in that area - as a 2.8/24-70. Maybe there is more vignetting with the zoom, but that can be easily corrected via any post processing SW.

    For those who think I am trolling - please stop such accusations, as this is NOT my intent and I am not religious about any system. My choices is simple: what I can afford, am willing to spend and which I like to use.

    All who are happy with their Alpha system I wish them luck and all the best and enjoy! You made the right decisions for you! For me this was no longer the case.

  39. #39
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Manchester/Jerusalem
    Posts
    2,652
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    290

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Wedding was just an example Marc, I only speak for that which I know, any profession which requires backup on site would be the same would it not?
    I am not a painter, nor an artist. Therefore I can see straight, and that may be my undoing. - Alfred Stieglitz

    Website: http://www.timelessjewishart.com

  40. #40
    Senior Member douglasf13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, USA
    Posts
    1,965
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Makes sense to me, Marc. Granted, your mentor's advice may need a little updating, because we don't all use the same "film" in cameras anymore, so the body makes more of a difference these days.

    p.s. Man, I would kill for a couple of M9s!

  41. #41
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,871
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Rubinstein View Post
    Wedding was just an example Marc, I only speak for that which I know, any profession which requires backup on site would be the same would it not?
    Not being a pro myself, but even as passionate non pro photographer I would not consider carrying 2 different DSLR systems at the same time, simply because operating these systems is so different that it just can be the source of failure.

    Truth is that each system has its merits and drawbacks and all have their outstanding lenses etc. Unfortunately these are not coming from just 1 system.

  42. #42
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
    Makes sense to me, Marc. Granted, your mentor's advice may need a little updating, because we don't all use the same "film" in cameras anymore, so the body makes more of a difference these days.

    p.s. Man, I would kill for a couple of M9s!
    That's about what you'd have to do to get two of them douglas. I got one of the first 20 into the USA, then I dropped to the bottom of the list for the second one. So, until I get the M9 back-up, I'll have to drag the Sony bag of bricks to every wedding. A M8 is not an option, been there, done that.

    M9 is the BEST 35mm camera I've ever used in terms of IQ to my eye. I only wish Leica had produced the AF R10 successor to the CCD DMR, which was the next best 35mm camera I've ever used regarding IQ. I just have never taken to any CMOS sensor camera ... the Sony probably being the closest.

    My dream is to off the 35mm DSLRs completely like Jack just did. The latest crop of MFDs has raised my hopes that can be accomplished.

    -Marc

  43. #43
    Tony Beach
    Guest

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by ptomsu View Post
    I missed these improvements at Sony so far, maybe they will come but I cannot see that happen anytime soon. Lenses like a 2/24 or similar are not what would make me buy into a prime, as long as I have a great and reasonably fast zoom in that area - as a 2.8/24-70. Maybe there is more vignetting with the zoom, but that can be easily corrected via any post processing SW.
    Well, the Zeiss 24-70 is not "great" at 24mm, it has soft corners (not just vignetting, but completely smudged detail). The problem on the two copies I had was so bad that I'm on the fence about abandoning the 24-70 entirely and replacing it with primes. I can see doing 98% of my people shots using just two primes, the 24/2 and the 85/1.4, and that makes the 24-70 unnecessary weight.

    As for Nikon, they don't have a 24 MP DSLR that I can afford. I am inclined to stick with both Sony and Nikon because I don't want to be dependent on just one brand delivering for me. I've been waiting two years for Nikon to deliver a camera like the A900, and it's starting to look like it's not going to ever happen. Besides that, I like the colors I get from my A850 better than anything I've seen from a Nikon camera.

  44. #44
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,871
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by Tony Beach View Post
    Well, the Zeiss 24-70 is not "great" at 24mm, it has soft corners (not just vignetting, but completely smudged detail). The problem on the two copies I had was so bad that I'm on the fence about abandoning the 24-70 entirely and replacing it with primes. I can see doing 98% of my people shots using just two primes, the 24/2 and the 85/1.4, and that makes the 24-70 unnecessary weight.

    As for Nikon, they don't have a 24 MP DSLR that I can afford. I am inclined to stick with both Sony and Nikon because I don't want to be dependent on just one brand delivering for me. I've been waiting two years for Nikon to deliver a camera like the A900, and it's starting to look like it's not going to ever happen. Besides that, I like the colors I get from my A850 better than anything I've seen from a Nikon camera.
    The Nikkor 24-70 is really a winner, I had this lens and if I had known how good it is compared to the Zeiss I would have never switched from N to S a year ago - almost sure.

  45. #45
    Senior Member douglasf13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, USA
    Posts
    1,965
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    I certainly wouldn't say that the Nikkor 24-70 is a better lens than the Zeiss. Just different strengths/weaknesses. I'm not sure I've ever seen another zoom that has a better "look" to the pictures than the Zeiss.

    I guess we should take your opinion with a grain of salt though, because two of the things that you mentioned that you disliked about the Sony, handling and color, are two of the major reasons most buy the camera in the first place.

  46. #46
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,871
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
    I certainly wouldn't say that the Nikkor 24-70 is a better lens than the Zeiss. Just different strengths/weaknesses. I'm not sure I've ever seen another zoom that has a better "look" to the pictures than the Zeiss.

    I guess we should take your opinion with a grain of salt though, because two of the things that you mentioned that you disliked about the Sony, handling and color, are two of the major reasons most buy the camera in the first place.
    The Sony colors (camera) are great indeed. But what happened since the D3 that the Nikon colors out of the camera are at least as good. So the difference is the optics. I must say I really like Zeiss and I liked all my Hasselblad and Contax optics from Zeiss just because of the IQ they produced. But I cannot see this difference any more with the current Sony-Zeiss lenses. I am not saying the IQ and colors are better or worse than Nikon but I see mainly no more difference.

    Adding that all up and have more flexible lens offering from Nikon my decision was clear. Maybe not urgent and I also do not earn my living with photography, because then I maybe would have not invested, but for me as a passionate photographer it was enough to switch.

    And I must admit it is always nice to have something new to play with - of course.

  47. #47
    Senior Member douglasf13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, USA
    Posts
    1,965
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by ptomsu View Post
    ...And I must admit it is always nice to have something new to play with - of course.
    Agreed! My M9 lust is pretty high.

    As for colors, I have to disagree. On technical terms, the A900 is able to resolve more green hues than any Nikon since the D2x, and the D2x still wasn't quite up to the A900 in this regard. Now, whether you see that or not is, of course, another issue, but I suggest you reconsider your raw converter, profiling, etc. to maximize your A900 files before moving on to another brand, as it seems you may have not been getting the most out of the A900.

  48. #48
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,871
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Quote Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
    Agreed! My M9 lust is pretty high.

    As for colors, I have to disagree. On technical terms, the A900 is able to resolve more green hues than any Nikon since the D2x, and the D2x still wasn't quite up to the A900 in this regard. Now, whether you see that or not is, of course, another issue, but I suggest you reconsider your raw converter, profiling, etc. to maximize your A900 files before moving on to another brand, as it seems you may have not been getting the most out of the A900.
    My RAW converters were (are): C1Pro, Aperture 2 and 3 as well as LR2 and of course PS CS3 and 4. I have calibrated displays, one being an Eizo 24" latest generation which comes with a calibration device.

    I am using a calibrated workflow.

    I never liked the colors of the D2X, which was the issue to change finally to A900. So interesting that you put it above the newer Nikon cameras. I have seen numerous samples from D3, D300s, D3X and some D3s on this equipment and I find all of them equal or better to A900.

    Either I am doing something wrong or I am color blind - no matter this is my impression and this is what finally counts for me.

    PS1: all of these color reproductions can be just forgotten compared to my H3D39. This is also the reason why I am a bit more reluctant about exact color reproduction of my DSLR equipment, as for the real stuff I am using Hasselblad. Maybe I should not think like? Not sure, but this is the way I go.

    As I said these decisions are all very subjective and may not be accurate for anyone else of course.

    PS2: I actually never found the greens of the A900 so outstanding, I liked more the overall color reproduction, especially in the blues and reds, not the greens, which tended to be too yellowish - in all RAW converters.

  49. #49
    Subscriber Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    130
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    24

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    Wow, this is incredible - something is wrong. I have owned the D2X, D3, D3X & D3s - all are sold and gone. No one approaches my a900, 24-70 and 135 1.8 in color reproduction.

    Douglas told me (thanks a million Douglas) to use Raw Therapee last year and the results always bring a smile to my face.

    These are my observations (including Douglas & Marc) and obviously differ from yours.

    PS: Has anybody noticed how the build quality of Nikon lenses has fallen in the past few years?

    Best Regards,

    Robert

  50. #50
    Senior Member douglasf13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, USA
    Posts
    1,965
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Finally a Carl Zeiss 24 mm f 2.0 coming

    I certainly don't use standard profiles for C1 and LR3 (of course, any adobe converter pre-LR3 isn't even worth mentioning for A900 files.) The C1 profile for the A900 is particularly bad. Anyways, we're confusing color accuracy with profiling. Below is probably one of the most enlightening, single posts about color that I've seen. Everyone should read it, if they haven't already. Peter, you may find the MFDB part particularly interesting:

    http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/847088/2#7908771

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •