Douglas, Others - I have update from my side.
I have made few compareable shots with M9 and NEX and am changing mind. Indeed, AA filter seems to be weaker, than usually. Maybe not so weak as in u43, but for sure more weak, than in average dSLR.
I am not presenting shots, as they were just made at night in the room, but at apertures from f/2.8 till f/11 NEX surprised me positively. Of course it is not M9 level, but is better than I thought.
Now - question could be - why I was thinking differently?
I know the answer.
Most shots I made with NEX were taken:
- on higher ISO, often 1600
- widely open
In such conditions - forced in my case by weather, light and missed hot shoe in NEX - results do not show maximum capabilities of NEX sensor.
Higher ISO eats details, like with most of cameras.
But also wide open aperture too.
What I observed is - from aperture f/2.8 to f/11 - the difference between M9 and NEX is constant.
But at f/1.4 and f/2 - M9 has bigger advantage in showing details, than NEX - and that also affected my previous way of thinking.
PS:
lenstip.com portal - also confirmed AA is weaker in NEX - maybe just 'in one direction', whatever it means.
They wrote about it recently in comments under one of articles.
I have made few compareable shots with M9 and NEX and am changing mind. Indeed, AA filter seems to be weaker, than usually. Maybe not so weak as in u43, but for sure more weak, than in average dSLR.
I am not presenting shots, as they were just made at night in the room, but at apertures from f/2.8 till f/11 NEX surprised me positively. Of course it is not M9 level, but is better than I thought.
Now - question could be - why I was thinking differently?
I know the answer.
Most shots I made with NEX were taken:
- on higher ISO, often 1600
- widely open
In such conditions - forced in my case by weather, light and missed hot shoe in NEX - results do not show maximum capabilities of NEX sensor.
Higher ISO eats details, like with most of cameras.
But also wide open aperture too.
What I observed is - from aperture f/2.8 to f/11 - the difference between M9 and NEX is constant.
But at f/1.4 and f/2 - M9 has bigger advantage in showing details, than NEX - and that also affected my previous way of thinking.
PS:
lenstip.com portal - also confirmed AA is weaker in NEX - maybe just 'in one direction', whatever it means.
They wrote about it recently in comments under one of articles.