Site Sponsors
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 200 of 319

Thread: Sony A77

  1. #151
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    271
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by jonoslack View Post
    but there ain't nothing to beat an M9 and a WATE in that department (i.e. ultralight landscape).
    There is the not so small issue of cost there...
    SONY A900
    Always outnumbered, never outgunned.
    My Site|Facebook Fanpage|

  2. #152
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    jonoslack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Anglia & Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    11,778
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by Lonnie Utah View Post
    There is the not so small issue of cost there...
    Yes, well, I do understand that. To be honest, I think that landscape with most of these little cameras is an issue - the lenses usually just don't make it to the edges . . . . the 12mm on m4/3 is a nice lens, and that is sharp to the corners, but these are few and far between.

    I think Jorgen has it with Sony, that there really isn't a good wide prime for APS/c.

    Just this guy you know

  3. #153
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Warsaw, Poland
    Posts
    188
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Can alphamount ssm lenses autofocus on nex e-mount in contrast mode with the smaller adapter? Or is it manual focus only without the frankenadapter? I am not clear on that.

    From dpreview:
    "Further lens options - LA-EA2 Alpha mount autofocus adapter
    "To further expand the range of lenses that NEX owners can use with full functionality, Sony has also announced the LA-EA2 adapter that promises fast autofocus with all existing Alpha mount lenses. This uses the company's SLT technology, with a fixed 'translucent' mirror and built-in phase detection AF sensor, plus an AF motor for 'screw-drive' lenses. Somewhat reminiscent of Leica's old 'Visoflex' system for its M-mount film rangefinders, the rather bulky housing also has its own tripod socket for use with larger lenses. The LA-EA2 includes the same 15-point AF sensor as the SLT A65 and original A55.

    The Sony LA-EA2 NEX-to-SLT adapter promises fully-functioning fast phase-detection autofocus with all Alpha-mount AF lenses - something no other mirrorless system can quite match

    While this certainly expands on the range of lenses accessible to NEX owners, we're not entirely convinced of its real-world practicality (especially as, at $399, it's not cheap). We have a sneaking suspicion that it only exists to show that the NEX can be used with more than the handful of native E-mount lenses, rather than being a big seller. It seems likely that most people who own a range of Alpha lenses will already have SLRs to use them on, increasingly supplemented by 'real' SLTs. And perhaps the biggest attraction of mirrorless camera over SLRs is compactness, which rather goes away when using AF lenses with such a large adapter. But for those who bought a NEX and then discovered that they really wanted an SLT after all, it could well come in handy, and we can see potential for videography."
    Last edited by nugat; 9th February 2014 at 07:38.

  4. #154
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    271
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by jonoslack View Post
    I think Jorgen has it with Sony, that there really isn't a good wide prime for APS/c.
    Which is exactly why I think I'm going to pass on the A77. Basically the only options are the sony/minolta 11-18, the siggy 10-20 (4.5-5.6 or the 3.5), or the Tamron 11-18 in the zoom world. There are also several sigma prime options (4.5, 8, 10mm) and the Samyang 8 & 14mm. All of these are OK, and I'm sure that they would work, but none of them are stellar, esp when compared to my CZ16-35.

    Looking at my basic lens lineup (CZ16-35,CZ24-70,Siggy 70-200 f/2.8) the ranges get a little funky on APS-C. I'm not sure that the 16-250 I have that lives full time on my A200 would be a great choice on the 77. I'm sure it would be OK, but it's not a knock your sock off type of lens.

    So, I guess I have to wait. I am going to go to my local shop and handle the A77. If it blow me away, I might bite. But that still means spending another $600-700 on glass (for a mediocre UWA), and I'm sure at that point I'm close to the price point of the new FF. I might as well wait....
    SONY A900
    Always outnumbered, never outgunned.
    My Site|Facebook Fanpage|

  5. #155
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    271
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by nugat View Post
    Can alphamount ssm lenses autofocus on nex e-mount in contrast mode with the smaller adapter?
    Yes. With the LA-EA1, SSM (and some of sigmas HSM's) A-mount lenses will AF on the NEX in contrast detect mode. However, you need to update the firmware of both the NEX and the LA-EA1 to make it do so. Originally it was un-possible. There are quite a few reviews reports from the early days that are still on the web saying it can't be done, which confuses people.
    SONY A900
    Always outnumbered, never outgunned.
    My Site|Facebook Fanpage|

  6. #156
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    jonoslack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Anglia & Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    11,778
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by Lonnie Utah View Post
    Which is exactly why I think I'm going to pass on the A77. Basically the only options are the sony/minolta 11-18, the siggy 10-20 (4.5-5.6 or the 3.5), or the Tamron 11-18 in the zoom world. There are also several sigma prime options (4.5, 8, 10mm) and the Samyang 8 & 14mm. All of these are OK, and I'm sure that they would work, but none of them are stellar, esp when compared to my CZ16-35.

    Looking at my basic lens lineup (CZ16-35,CZ24-70,Siggy 70-200 f/2.8) the ranges get a little funky on APS-C. I'm not sure that the 16-250 I have that lives full time on my A200 would be a great choice on the 77. I'm sure it would be OK, but it's not a knock your sock off type of lens.

    So, I guess I have to wait. I am going to go to my local shop and handle the A77. If it blow me away, I might bite. But that still means spending another $600-700 on glass (for a mediocre UWA), and I'm sure at that point I'm close to the price point of the new FF. I might as well wait....
    I'm always rather impressed by the Sigma UW lenses - the 10-20 f3.5 I had on the Pentax was compact, well made and sharp - cheap too. But basically I do agree - I have similar lenses to go with my A900, and although the telephotos remain exciting, the midrange lenses do become decidedly blah.

    Just this guy you know

  7. #157
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    271
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by jonoslack View Post
    I'm always rather impressed by the Sigma UW lenses - the 10-20 f3.5 I had on the Pentax was compact, well made and sharp - cheap too. But basically I do agree - I have similar lenses to go with my A900, and although the telephotos remain exciting, the midrange lenses do become decidedly blah.
    Yeah, I've been keeping my eyes open for a good deal on a sigma in anticipation of having to get something. I think I'd go with the 4.5-5.6 tho, because of the 77mm filter size. The 3.5 is 82mm and I'm not sure how well it would play with the lee filter holder.

    For me, the extended tele range would be the only reason to jump to the A77. But since those ranges make up less than 10% of my shooting, it doesn't make sense to buy something just for a 1.5x boost. If that's the only goal, a much better plan (economically) would be to get the 1.4x or 2x tele-converter and turn my 70-200 f/2.8 into a 140-400 f/5.6.
    SONY A900
    Always outnumbered, never outgunned.
    My Site|Facebook Fanpage|

  8. #158
    Senior Member pegelli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    2,118
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by nugat View Post
    Can alphamount ssm lenses autofocus on nex e-mount in contrast mode with the smaller adapter? Or is it manual focus only without the frankenadapter? I am not clear on that.
    Yes, ssm lenses AF with the LA-EA1 but slow. Best term I heard it describe is "pedestrian". Screw drive lenses are MF only with that smaller/mirrorless adapter.

  9. #159
    Subscriber Member Jorgen Udvang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pratamnak
    Posts
    9,343
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2157

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by jonoslack View Post
    I'm always rather impressed by the Sigma UW lenses - the 10-20 f3.5 I had on the Pentax was compact, well made and sharp - cheap too. But basically I do agree - I have similar lenses to go with my A900, and although the telephotos remain exciting, the midrange lenses do become decidedly blah.
    The best, smallest and lightest WA lens for the NEX 7 is probably an Olympus E-PL3 with the 12mm. It's tiny, has an articulated LCD, weighs only around 450g with batteries (150g less than the Sigma 10-20 with adapter but without a camera) and serves as a backup camera should you drop the NEX into the river.

    The lack of high quality lenses is typical for problems with many Sony products: They are very well executed from so many points of view, and extremely attractive and well designed, although most of them have their little "Sony quirks". But they often fail to see the product in a broader context. Walkman is the typical Sony success; you load a cassette that is a world wide standard, you plug it into your ear, and it works. The Elcaset was the opposite. The product was fantastic, but they forgot to consider the fact that almost everybody on earth who could afford to buy one, already had a music system that worked well enough... and it was at least twice as expensive as the competition... and Sony was the only manufacturer supporting it.

    The Alpha mount was a lucky strike, since the product line-up was already more or less there together with a customer base. NEX is a great idea, and partly well executed, but it fails in two major areas: It has a menu system that nobody asked for and that alienate many photographers, and it's seriously lacking on the lens side. Why couldn't they, instead of the Frankenadapter which must have cost some serious work to develop, have gone to Zeiss and asked them to make a WA lens too. I seem to remember that Zeiss has a few WA tricks up their sleeve.

    To stay with the cassette terminology: The Frankenadapter reminds me of the old Nakamichi 1000 cassette deck; fantastic quality, but you didn't want to carry one unless you really, really had to. Not that it was meant to be portable to start with, but the Frankenadapter doesn't seem to be very portable either.

    One could of course live with the 7 and just the 24 and 50mm lenses. I only had two lenses for my OM-1 the first number of years as well. But with the OM, I knew that it was possible to buy some high quality glass if I wanted. Lots of it. Even the 4/3 system included some rather hot glass from the outset, even if there was just one 5MP body to choose from. The lack of good, compact primes for the NEX, and given Sony's history of giving up if the hill becomes too steep, would make me reluctant to invest in this undoubtedly very fine camera if I had the monies to pay 3,000 shiny silver dollars for that and the two good lenses. Which is a pity, because it seems to be a very nice piece of equipment, more or less tailor made for the kind of photography that I do.

  10. #160
    Senior Member douglasf13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, USA
    Posts
    1,965
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Sony A77

    The bad performance of the Sony 16mm is often overstated. Sure, there is a drop off in sharpness at the very, very corner of the frame, but put on the .75x converter and slightly crop to about a 20mm equivalent, and it is just fine. That would be especially easy with 24 megapixels. Considering the size, focal length, aperture, and minimal distortion and flare, I think the Sony 16 is actually pretty remarkable for what it is, and Olympus had to make their 12/2 twice as long to get better performance out of the same equivalent focal length and DOF. Of course, all of the review sites with test targets only a few feet away may not agree.

  11. #161
    Subscriber Member Jorgen Udvang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pratamnak
    Posts
    9,343
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2157

    Re: Sony A77

    Douglas, if I invest $3,000 or more in a camera system, I don't want to "put on the .75x converter and slightly crop to about a 20mm equivalent". I would rather have a slightly larger lens that is sharp from corner to corner, than save 54g and 20mm on one lens. For m4/3 there are now 4 very good WA lenses available, 2 zooms and 2 primes. I fail to see how Sony would lack the ability to develop at least one very good WA zoom and one good prime. This seems to be a question of priorities and attitude. That is what worries me... or rather would have worried me if I had bought into the system, which I won't do at the moment.

  12. #162
    Subscriber Member Jorgen Udvang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pratamnak
    Posts
    9,343
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2157

    Re: Sony A77

    ... or maybe I will

    OM-2 plus NEX-7 and OM lenses, film and digital, 21, 35, 85 plus 135mm? Sounds like a nice travel kit

  13. #163
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    3,187
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    @Jorgen I agree with what you are largely saying about the NEX system. There are more NEX body models than lenses so it's hard to take Sony serious about it. It's a great sensor and I've gotten good results out of the system. That being said a couple of low end zooms and a decent WA prime (for the money) leaves a lot to be desired. I was an early adopter in the NEX system because it seemed to provide noticeable sensor improvements over the Micro 4/3. What it doesn't provide is comparable lens quality. The Panasonic 14-45 kicks the crap out of the 18-55 Sony and I won't mention the 20, 45 Macro, or 7-14 WA Zoom. It's a big reason I went back to the G1 in favor of the NEX-5. (along with a M9 purchase.) I've taken some of my best pictures with the Micro 4/3 system but the Sony sensor is much better for low light.

    I will see what the NEX-7 adds to the mix and of course the A77.
    Sony Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com

  14. #164
    Senior Member douglasf13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, USA
    Posts
    1,965
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by Jorgen Udvang View Post
    Douglas, if I invest $3,000 or more in a camera system, I don't want to "put on the .75x converter and slightly crop to about a 20mm equivalent". I would rather have a slightly larger lens that is sharp from corner to corner, than save 54g and 20mm on one lens. For m4/3 there are now 4 very good WA lenses available, 2 zooms and 2 primes. I fail to see how Sony would lack the ability to develop at least one very good WA zoom and one good prime. This seems to be a question of priorities and attitude. That is what worries me... or rather would have worried me if I had bought into the system, which I won't do at the moment.
    Well, if we're going by reviews, the 12/2 still didn't get super sharp ratings corner to corner at Photozone, despite its size and cost. Better than the Sony 16? Surely, but I'm simply saying that I wouldn't add an entirely different camera body just for that lens, as you mentioned. Also, the 16mm has already been shown to have better corners on the NEX-C3, when compared to the NEX-5, so new tests are going to need to be made for the improved sensors. Fortunately, the wide angle zoom is on the Sony roadmap for next year.

  15. #165
    Senior Member douglasf13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, USA
    Posts
    1,965
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by HiredArm View Post
    @Jorgen I agree with what you are largely saying about the NEX system. There are more NEX body models than lenses so it's hard to take Sony serious about it. It's a great sensor and I've gotten good results out of the system. That being said a couple of low end zooms and a decent WA prime (for the money) leaves a lot to be desired. I was an early adopter in the NEX system because it seemed to provide noticeable sensor improvements over the Micro 4/3. What it doesn't provide is comparable lens quality. The Panasonic 14-45 kicks the crap out of the 18-55 Sony and I won't mention the 20, 45 Macro, or 7-14 WA Zoom. It's a big reason I went back to the G1 in favor of the NEX-5. (along with a M9 purchase.) I've taken some of my best pictures with the Micro 4/3 system but the Sony sensor is much better for low light.

    I will see what the NEX-7 adds to the mix and of course the A77.
    The 30 macro, 24 Zeiss, and 50/1.8 go a long way in adding value to the NEX system. Regardless, I'm sticking with rangefinder lenses.

  16. #166
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    iiiNelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    3,187
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
    The 30 macro, 24 Zeiss, and 50/1.8 go a long way in adding value to the NEX system. Regardless, I'm sticking with rangefinder lenses.
    I agree but they aren't here now and the NEX system has been out for almost a year and a half. In that time period all of the lenses I mentioned (plus the 3 original Olympus offerings that I don't own) were available on Micro 4/3. Nevermind that I haven't seen the performance yet. Believe me I really want the NEX to succeed because I still have my NEX-5 but it's collecting dust... figuratively.
    Sony Visible Light & IR Photographer
    http://www.iiinelsonimages.com

  17. #167
    Subscriber Member Jorgen Udvang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pratamnak
    Posts
    9,343
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2157

    Re: Sony A77

    Panasonic has announced that they are developing 12-35 and 35-100mm f/2.0 zooms for m4/3. That does it for me I suppose.

  18. #168
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    384
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by edwardkaraa View Post
    The A77 will be a good indicator as to what to expect from the A99. It seems that it's going to be an awesome camera, so there are reasons to be optimistic.
    Can't agree more

  19. #169
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    etrigan63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Earth, Sol System (near Miami, FL)
    Posts
    2,501
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    21

    Re: Sony A77

    Jono,
    did your retailer give you an ETA as to the arrival of your A77? I am keen to hear the opinion of someone who knows his way around rather than the bits I've been seeing. Phil's team does a fine job with the prerelease stuff, but it's a little hard to get feedback from them. I am interested in the A77's lowlight capabilities as compared to my D700.

    All the best...
    Carlos Echenique | Carlos Echenique Photography |Olympus OM-D E-M1 MK II | Olympus Pen-F - M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8, M.Zuiko 25mm f/1.8, M.Zuiko 45mm f/1.8, Rokinon 12mm f/2 NCS, M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8, M.Zuiko 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO, M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO

  20. #170
    Member LizaWitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    112
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    In the early days of micro-4/3s there were just the kit lenses and a lot of complaints about lens quality. It took a couple years for there to be more than one good standard lens for that system. Seems lens production takes a long time to gear up (and lens design might as well) ... so I think it still is too early to expect great lenses for Sony. I think this Zeiss lens might be the sony equivalent of the Pana-Leica 20mm f1.7 for m4/3s-- the first "great" lens for the system.

    Seems these adapters, even if they are hack solutions, are a great way to leverage existing lens collections onto the new platform, and make sense given that lenses always seem to take a long time to bring to market, even when they are "obviously" needed.

    I think to the manufacturers, the kit zoom and a kit prime are what's needed first, and then, if the system is successful, they start on the other lenses.

  21. #171
    Senior Member pegelli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    2,118
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77



    Are we sliding the A77 thread to become a discussion forum for missing Nex lenses?

    I think the A77 has sufficient high quality native Sony, heritage Minolta and 3rd party lenses to satisfy most users.

  22. #172
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    222
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    77

    Re: Sony A77

    LOL... I was thinking stick a 70-400 lens on it, and leave it there. Perfect for wildlife shots etc, especially with the 1.4x or 2x 12mp feature...

    I could not find this feature in specifications at dpreview. It might be there and I missed it, however...
    But at photographybay heres what they said.
    http://www.photographybay.com/2011/0...JJxyR99jJv62xu

    The Smart Teleconverter displays an enlarged central portion of the image sensor, allowing compositions to be displayed clearly on the OLED viewfinder and captured as 12 megapixel images with a digital zoom factor of 1.4x or 2x.
    I thought a 400mm lens on crop body was a good minimum to have, 600mm or so, is now upto 1200mm easily...

  23. #173
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    etrigan63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Earth, Sol System (near Miami, FL)
    Posts
    2,501
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    21

    Re: Sony A77

    Well I just got a hold the Alpha 77 brochure. Here is the link in case anyone is interested:

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/69118/alpha/63723520-A-77.pdf

    I was looking at the grip design and it is possible that Sony could make a larger battery to fit in there and give you more shots.
    Carlos Echenique | Carlos Echenique Photography |Olympus OM-D E-M1 MK II | Olympus Pen-F - M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8, M.Zuiko 25mm f/1.8, M.Zuiko 45mm f/1.8, Rokinon 12mm f/2 NCS, M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8, M.Zuiko 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO, M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO

  24. #174
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    933
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Waynelake, that is pretty much my game plan for the a77.

    I do most of my shots with my NEX 5 (landscapes/seascapes) and carry a a33 attached to a 70-400 in a camera/lens holster for any wildlife shots that might present themselves. A 24mp crop sensor on a G glass 70-400 just fits my needs and wants perfectly and is way cheaper than trying to chase down a fast long prime lens ( plus a lighter pkg to carry for my 5-7% usage requirements). The a77 also will work with the minolta 5600 wireless flash system for those extremely rare times I need that as well.

    It was a hard decision for me whether to order the a77 or the NEX7 (and I may even own both eventually) but the a33 had some issues that did not suit my needs and so far the NEX 5 is still my more than acceptable workhorse so right now the a77 was more important to get first. Good ole dang needs and wants ..... Will put a retiree in the poor house

  25. #175
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    222
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    77

    Re: Sony A77

    I have a friend visiting each year from Europe. We are meant to be going to Stewart Island NZ (native birds) maybe February/March... I have not had a camera for a while, so now its no excuses...

    I figure the 70-400 and A77 good high ISO would do instead of faster telephoto. The Zeiss 24 F2 would be nice, and I'm trying to figure out what the Leica fisheye works out to be on crop body. I've read its ?12mm or probably about 20mm. Either way, those 3 lenses could be a choice. Yeah, a 20, 35 equivalent and the big zoom... lol...

    Oh...
    I spotted at keh Minolta 300 2.8 APO for about $3000
    ...and Leica 400/800 lens head with 2.8 and 5.6 focus modules about $11,000
    Thought the later probably a good price.

  26. #176
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    222
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    77

    Re: Sony A77

    Thanks for the pdf Carlos

  27. #177
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    933
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Yeah $1400 for a body is a bargain price considering other options for long tele wildlife shots

  28. #178
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    etrigan63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Earth, Sol System (near Miami, FL)
    Posts
    2,501
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    21

    Re: Sony A77

    Just a heads up: Iridient RAW Developer now supports A77 & A65 RAW files. You can download a demo here.
    Carlos Echenique | Carlos Echenique Photography |Olympus OM-D E-M1 MK II | Olympus Pen-F - M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8, M.Zuiko 25mm f/1.8, M.Zuiko 45mm f/1.8, Rokinon 12mm f/2 NCS, M.Zuiko 75mm f/1.8, M.Zuiko 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO, M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO

  29. #179
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    384
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    I have just placed a reorder for a77. From the day of announcement, I have been balancing the benefits of Nex7 vs A77. No doubt I will also get Nex7 but the lack of auto-focusing lenses in Nex line is a quite disappointing and I hardly understand Sony's marketing ideas for this. I worried about Nex future as both Panasonic and Olympus have been putting so many good lenses to the customers. Recent month sales in Japan reflect this point.
    I was thrilled about the new adapter but before that, a77 is a good alternative to the Nex7+adapter combo.

  30. #180
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    933
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    After looking around the web and the volume of "professor/engineering types" analyzing, dissecting, and throwing stones at available Internet images (as they did with the NEX5 and the first SLT's when launched) one has to question the logic of Sony's marketing strategies. They allow the release of pre production images months before production units are available and then the lovers and haters go to war! Each trying to go one up on the other using non-finalized images are a reference for debate. What the heck is that?

    I watched this go on on nearly every new product launch and then finally when the product gets into customers hands all is well once again in the Sony user's world.

    One really has to question the benefit of marketing in this manner. I know I would hold the product till it was finalized and ready to ship then announce it as I was shipping it to the wholesalers and eliminate all the possible customer in fighting that currently exists. Let the proof be in the pudding!

    I think I will just stay here on this site till my product arrives as I am weary of the chaos on other sites about these products. C'mon late October

  31. #181
    Subscriber Member Jorgen Udvang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pratamnak
    Posts
    9,343
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2157

    Re: Sony A77

    Most camera reviews are crap anyway. Some of them present studio photos, taken on a tripod, that aren't even properly focused. Then they spend countless pages explaining features that most photographers will hardly ever use and that I prefer not to know about since they tend to get in the way of my photography, before they compare it to a bunch of cameras that I know nothing about since I've never used them, and conclude that this particular model is "Highly Recommended" or scores 75% out of something, which probably means that the camera in question will only get 75% keepers

    The only solution seems to be to read this excellent forum and/or buy the camera.

    Edit: I've looked at a few samples that have been posted around the web. There's a frightening lot of detail in the low ISO photo, but high ISO, even 1600, seems rather noisy, at least at full resolution and it's still very visible even when the size is reduced. This makes me wonder if Sony, at least from a photographer's point of view, has taken it a little bit too far this time. But the gadget freaks will buy it in hordes obviously, and success is mostly measured in figures, not by artistic potential

  32. #182
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    933
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Yeah, buying has always been believing for me

  33. #183
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    222
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    77

    Re: Sony A77

    Yeah.......
    All those endless features, or program modes is enough to get a person lost in the menu... Some I admit are good, but theres only so much needed, and maybe + 1 or 2 more things. If that makes sense...

  34. #184
    Subscriber Member kit laughlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Two suitcases and the latest MBA
    Posts
    1,334
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Yeah, buying has always been believing for me
    and thus the Code: "Buy now, explain later (test in the meantime!)"

  35. #185
    Senior Member dhsimmonds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hampshire, UK
    Posts
    904
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    20

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by jonoslack View Post
    Yes, well, I do understand that. To be honest, I think that landscape with most of these little cameras is an issue - the lenses usually just don't make it to the edges . . . . the 12mm on m4/3 is a nice lens, and that is sharp to the corners, but these are few and far between.

    I think Jorgen has it with Sony, that there really isn't a good wide prime for APS/c.
    I use my full frame A900 lenses with my A700 even the zooms are sharp to the edges! One of the benefits of using the sweet spot of the lens!
    Cheers, Dave
    www.simmondsphotography.com

  36. #186
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    jonoslack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Anglia & Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    11,778
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by dhsimmonds View Post
    I use my full frame A900 lenses with my A700 even the zooms are sharp to the edges! One of the benefits of using the sweet spot of the lens!
    Of course . . . quite agree . . . but what do you do for a wide angle?

    Just this guy you know

  37. #187
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    222
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    77

    Re: Sony A77

    ?...the Leica-R 15mm 3.5...?

  38. #188
    Senior Member dhsimmonds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hampshire, UK
    Posts
    904
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    20

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by jonoslack View Post
    Of course . . . quite agree . . . but what do you do for a wide angle?
    Hi Jono

    I then use the A900 with my ZA16-35....it's a really great lens Jono!

    I only use the A700 as a back up for my A900 and as a 1.5x teleconverter for my long lenses. the G70-400 becomes a great 105-600 for bird photography.
    Cheers, Dave
    www.simmondsphotography.com

  39. #189
    Senior Member pegelli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    2,118
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by dhsimmonds View Post
    I only use the A700 as a back up for my A900 and as a 1.5x teleconverter for my long lenses.
    In a similar way my A850 has a built in 1.5 teleconverter, since there's hardly any difference in MP between the APS-C crop of the FF sensor (11 MP) and the A700 sensor (12 MP) (assuming you don't mind the big raw files)

    If you see it that way every prime suddenly becomes a 1.5 zoom lens

  40. #190
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    337
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by pegelli View Post
    In a similar way my A850 has a built in 1.5 teleconverter, since there's hardly any difference in MP between the APS-C crop of the FF sensor (11 MP) and the A700 sensor (12 MP) (assuming you don't mind the big raw files)

    If you see it that way every prime suddenly becomes a 1.5 zoom lens
    That was a good one....poking a hole in the myth of the 1.5x converter. The A77 should be a true 1.5x converter for the A900, however (looking purely from a FOV perspective, of course).
    A900 with a few lenses, flashes etc.

  41. #191
    Senior Member dhsimmonds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hampshire, UK
    Posts
    904
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    20

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by roweraay View Post
    That was a good one....poking a hole in the myth of the 1.5x converter. The A77 should be a true 1.5x converter for the A900, however (looking purely from a FOV perspective, of course).
    It still doesn't help if you suddenly need a back-up.

    Yep, it happens and it's happened to me!

    It's also nice to have a tele lens on the A700 and a wider lens on the A900, both at the ready. When shooting wildlife anything can happen and usually very quickly so no time to change lenses. It's saved me quite a few otherwise lost shots.
    Cheers, Dave
    www.simmondsphotography.com

  42. #192
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    933
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Well, the production versions are being sold in Korea and Great Britain this week and rumored to be available in China today. Firmware is version 1.02 and from what has been posted by several new owners on the net I am very pleased with their images even-though they are just out of camera Jpeg's.

    I had a pre-order in with Amazon placed on the first day (8/24/11) but just cancelled it and pre-ordered through Sony Style. I had ordered with Amazon for "my protection" if I might find the camera did not fit my needs as their return policy is excellent. The problem with Amazon is they are historically 2-4 weeks behind Sony Style when it comes to availability and shipping dates. I have never returned a camera for any reason to a retailer or online store and now I know I will be pleased with the a77 for my requirements and returning will remain a non-issue.

    I may have a a77 in time for some fall scenics for my trip up to the Lehigh Valley around the end of October Now, comes the hard part ...... waiting the next few weeks

    The pixel peepers and nay sayers were really starting to get to me ..... now that regular people who I have communicated with for years on the net are taking real images and posting their impressions and images I am much more confident in my decision to acquire a a77!

  43. #193
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    jonoslack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Anglia & Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    11,778
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Sony A77

    Hmm. . . Silas (son) picked his up today . . . . I think I'll be getting mine tomorrow.

    I'll keep you guys posted!

    all the best

    Just this guy you know

  44. #194
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    933
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Great Jono! We have about another month to wait over here in the USA.

  45. #195
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    jonoslack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Anglia & Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    11,778
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim DE View Post
    Great Jono! We have about another month to wait over here in the USA.
    Well, against all the odds, perhaps Ill post the first image here tomorrow (I'll do my best)

    Just this guy you know

  46. #196
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    933
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    I will be curious on your take on this camera and it's IQ, Jono. From what I saw posted today from a owner in England I could find no cause for alarm about the issues the pixel peepers were in a uproar about with noise and high ISO's (not that I shoot high ISO's for any of my shots ... I rarely get above 200)

  47. #197
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    jonoslack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Anglia & Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    11,778
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Sony A77

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim DE View Post
    I will be curious on your take on this camera and it's IQ, Jono. From what I saw posted today from a owner in England I could find no cause for alarm about the issues the pixel peepers were in a uproar about with noise and high ISO's (not that I shoot high ISO's for any of my shots ... I rarely get above 200)
    Hi Jim
    I'm afraid the jury will be out for a while due to the lack of RAW support. My initial response is very favourable, but that's just looking at jpgs. Dxo seem to have had a look and they think it's pretty good as well.

    I'm afraid that the more the megapixels the more the pixelpeepers will complain, for the simple reason that they all seem to examine images at 100%, rather than by looking at an equivalent portion of the frame, which would be much fairer.

    What I can say is that the camera is fantastic - small(ish) light, very quiet, responsive, nice to hold, well laid out, easy to use (the manual is still in the box). It's been my first experience with focus peaking as well.

    all the best

    Just this guy you know

  48. #198
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    933
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    That's great to hear Jono. It is regrettable that RAW support lags so far behind but that is a common problem and a understandable one as well. Maybe, during the next month while I am waiting Aperture or PS will obtain RAW support by then. Yeah, I know, wishful thinking

    Your the second one I have seen remark about it's light weight and handling atributes. Nice when a camera just feels "right" in the hand.

    I will be looking forward to your further evaluations and pictures as I am sure many American here on this site will as well. Have fun my friend and thanks for your comments.

  49. #199
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    933
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Jono, I figure I will order some accessories for the a77 prior to it arriving and have a maybe silly question for you. I see it takes a Sony NP-FM500H battery. But also read a questionable comment on sony rumors "The vertical battery grip VG-C77AM will cost $299.99 US . And I have beent told the A77 will use the same battery as A700/A850/A900: The NP-FM500H." that made me pause and wonder if in reality it is the same exact battery with the connections in the exact same spot (also read where it was it's own dedicated battery in another review on the web). Figured I would go to the horses mouth and get verification from a actual owner who would definitely know before I order 3 additional batteries and a charger. Are the batteries the exact same ones as used in the a900?

  50. #200
    Subscriber Member kit laughlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Two suitcases and the latest MBA
    Posts
    1,334
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sony A77

    Jono wrote:

    12mm on m4/3 is a nice lens, and that is sharp to the corners,
    And Douglas mentioned a 12/2—which lens(es) are you talking about?

    TIA, kl

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •