Its long been my observation that there is little overlap in the skills needed in order to be prolific as:
a. a talented photographer
b. a professional photographer
c. a photographic gear tester
The skills as I seen them in order to be prolific in these each of these are for:
a. talent and the ability to preserver at the art and craft
b. ability to run a business and get clients to pay you for your product
c. ability to be rigorous, methodical and with an attention for the borderline irrelevant minutiae
Lloyd Chambers isn't possessed with great photographic talent (IMHO) and he doesn't earn a living from selling his photographs but he does have a penchant for being anal enough to find any flaw with a product no matter how small or large it may be.
Now one can look at this result, acknowledge that for the situations and subjects he found the issue with its there and then determine that it doesn't apply to their photography, either style or subject and move on (i.e. which is what I've done with a whole bunch of stuff Lloyd has said over the years). However, belittling him or what he does because what he does for a living "measure up" in your value system is ignorant at best and jerky at worst.
I say this with all due respect of course