Site Sponsors
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 103

Thread: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

  1. #1
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Maybe the title should have read ... "Most Conflicted Camera Buyer Ever", so, dear friends, bear with me please

    Like many of us on Get Dpi ... I'm willing to take a leap with new tech if it can add something ... or in the case of a really small camera like the A7/A7R, subtract something. I already have a proven high res camera with retina slicing acuity in the Leica S2 and CS optics. So, size is the only real benefit of the A7/A7R ... that, plus compatibility with my A mount lenses ... and some Leica M optics to provide an occasional color companion to my Leica M Mono.

    My A7R arrived a couple of days ago, and I have a few days to decide if it stays or goes back. Well, reading all the threads and posts on this camera including "Why I'm keeping it" or "Why I'm not" ... some great shots, and some not so great (smeared corners, color shading, etc.), shutter vibrations with certain lenses at certain shutter speeds., unacceptable lag, native lenses or not, etc. etc. etc.

    Recently I tested out a Leica M240 ... and for me there was no conflict at all ... I was NOT willing to put up with the IR contamination and other color issues ...not for $7K I wasn't. It was easier to send that back.

    This one has me in a tizzy. My "Mighty Mouse" A7R moniker and its' implied "Here I Come To Save The Day!" theme may have been premature ... or was it? Arrrrrggg, (BTW, I'll never test 2 cameras back-to-back ever again!)

    So far I've concentrated on use of a few ZA lenses mounted on the A7R via the new Sony LAEA4 with built in TTL Phase Detection AF, aperture drive mechanism, and Translucent mirror ...



    Here is what I've discovered to date:

    This combination is an even BIGGER battery eater. Since the batteries are new, it should improve a bit after a few depletion/recharging cycles, but it'll remain a power management issue none-the-less. I have 4 batteries, and I'll need them ... good thing they are small!

    The LAEA4 adapter doesn't really add all that much weight ... but it doesn't perform on par with the A99 AF either. While it is fast to spring into action, it is slower to lock-on than the A99. This was with the Sony-Minolta 50/1.4 and ZA135/1.8 neither of which has Super Sonic Wave (SSW) AF motors. However, it was much faster than my friend's Canon lenses and Metabones AF adapter. I will try the new ZA50/1.4 which does have SSW AF to see if that improves the AF lock-on speed.

    Best out-of-camera color rendition since the A900 ... apparently an attribute it is able to retain even up to ISO 5000 ... which the A900 is incapable of doing, and the A99 starts losing color fidelity past 2000. Not sure if this because it is 36 meg with the new processor, or if the color is the same with the A7. This is a HUGE plus for me.

    Shutter vibration is NOT a Long Lens factor with this adapter. I used the ZA 135/1.8, connected the LAEA4 adapter with a standard ARCA QR plate and mounted the rig on my ARCA ball head with ARCA Screw Knob QR attached to a Gitzo G 1348 Carbon Fiber Tri-Pod ... locked it all down. This is my usual kit for location work; (I have a beefy RSS rotator equipped studio stand for in-studio work). Shot a booze bottle with fine print on the rear label using the 10 sec. timer.

    My methodology was to keep the ISO the same at 400, and the aperture the same at f/3.2 and use auto WB ... and vary the amount of light on the label from a gridded soft box using the proportional modeling light on a Profoto D4-2400 generator. This was to eliminate all variables other than shutter shock.

    Shot at 1/30, 1/8 and 1/5 second shutter ... then got them all into PS as 20", 360PPI, 16 bit Tiffs in Profoto RGB ... and layered one over the other so I could turn on-and-off each layer zoomed to 100% on the critical focus point. Zero difference. Nada. None at all. Whew, that was a critical test for me. This means the A7R with ZAs could back up the S2 in a tri-pod use emergency.

    Lag time while shooting critical action? ... Ben has raised this issue, and it is one I am concerned with also. However, until it was raised, I didn't notice it while shooting my best test subject for constant motion ... out little Chihuahua "Dinky" who changes expression every 1/2 nano second, and exhibits more "vibration" than any shutter ... (it is what they do ... shake). I am going to concentrate on this more now that Ben raised the issue.

    A lot of my hand held candids with the 50/1.4 or 135/1.8 were not Pixel Peeping sharp at 100%. Guy has already commented on this is depth and is 100% correct. The Leica S2 is the same. My speculative take on this is that the A7R could be considered two cameras in one. Right lenses, right adapter, right technique and it is a little MF digital back ... hand held, cheater shutter speeds, and it will spectacularly show up less than stellar technique.

    However the files are so huge that when printed at most normal use sizes it'll look as good as my 24 meg A99 that is more forgiving even if more critically sharp at its' respective 100%. Down size the A7R to A99 size and the difference may not be all that visually different. I'll have to put that theory to a real world test ...

    Will do more today with other lenses and some with the Leica M lenses I intend using this camera with ... then draw my final conclusions ...

    To Keep or Not to Keep ... That is The Question! I have until Friday AM ...


    - Marc

    Some snaps ...
    Likes 11 Member(s) liked this post

  2. #2
    Senior Member Joe Colson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    1,911
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    36

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Good luck Marc. I've been using the A7R for a couple of weeks now, and love it. Especially with Leica M lenses (I don't use super-wides). I also use an M240 and and S, and have a Sony RX1 on the shelf, and the A7R combines the best of both the M240 and S in one small package. I find the Sony's EVF/Live View focusing system far superior to that of the M240, and as you and Guy have pointed out so clearly, with impeccable technique the Sony can produce outstanding 36MP files. I print big - 20x30" and larger - so the extra pixels do come in handy.

    I'll stay tuned for your results and conclusion, and will enjoy my own A7R in the meantime.

    Joe
    _________________________________
    Joe Colson Photography

  3. #3
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Knorp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,995
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Well, Big Smile Dinky seems to like your A7R ...

    All the best.
    Bart ...

  4. #4
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Vivek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    13,603
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    21

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Marc, Try a few studio shots with flash as well. At ISO50 and 64.

  5. #5
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Im in the same boat as Marc and will get to this later but my Sony was just delivered i need to open the bloody box. LOL
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Massachusetts and Vermont
    Posts
    947
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    I wouldn't think that the way to test for the effects of shutter vibration is to shoot three frames at 1/30, 1/8 and 1/5 and compare them. Those shutter speeds are all likely to be compromised by any shutter vibration, so they may look quite good in absolute terms, but not necessarily in relative terms compared to what the camera/lens is potentially capable of without the effects of any shutter vibration. OTOH, a frame at say 1/350 is unlikely to be compromised, and that frame would serve as a baseline to compare the frames shot at slower speeds.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    123
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    I'm enjoying my a7r more than any camera I've had in years. Small, mounts any lens made (most with excellent results) and with the ability to achieve pinpoint manual focus. The IQ is as good as one can find short of medium format.

    I don't really understand the knocks the a7(r) takes. I don't know that I'd want my a7r as my sole body, but I'm delighted to have it in my inventory. I have full and cropped frame DSLR bodies, with good glass to match, for autofocus and sports situations.

    The a7r is the Leica I would have never purchased.

    Graham
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  8. #8
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Holy Mother Of Smallness. Damn this thing is just amazingly small package. I maybe in big trouble with switching whole systems out. Testing first and lots of it first but if I had real money sitting around i would be hitting some buy buttons.
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    123
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    Holy Mother Of Smallness. Damn this thing is just amazingly small package.
    As many a7R pictures as I'd seen, even compared with other camera's, I had the same initial impression. One just isn't prepared for how small this camera is until holding it in hand.

    Graham

  10. #10
    Senior Member Joe Colson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    1,911
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    36

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    Holy Mother Of Smallness. Damn this thing is just amazingly small package. I maybe in big trouble with switching whole systems out. Testing first and lots of it first but if I had real money sitting around i would be hitting some buy buttons.
    Told you so!

    Joe
    _________________________________
    Joe Colson Photography

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Massachusetts and Vermont
    Posts
    947
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by GrahamB View Post
    I'm enjoying my a7r more than any camera I've had in years. Small, mounts any lens made (most with excellent results) and with the ability to achieve pinpoint manual focus. The IQ is as good as one can find short of medium format.

    I don't really understand the knocks the a7(r) takes. I don't know that I'd want my a7r as my sole body, but I'm delighted to have it in my inventory. I have full and cropped frame DSLR bodies, with good glass to match, for autofocus and sports situations.

    The a7r is the Leica I would have never purchased.

    Graham
    I don't think anyone is "knocking" the A7R. I am trying to figure out what performance or functionality issues there are with the camera, look for potential workarounds, and then be in a position to make an intelligent choice as to whether this camera, with its own unique set of plusses and minusses, works well for ME. Many others are going through the same process. Everbody comes at this differently. One guy shoots sports and needs great autofocus and high ISO. Another guy shoots landscapes in low light and cares most about ultimate IQ. Another guy has a bunch of Leica M lenses or other lenses and wants to use them with the A7R. Another guy shoots fashion. Another guy always uses a tripod. Another guy always shoots handheld. Another guy loves wide angle lenses and never shoots telephot. Another guy hates wide angle regularly shoots 100-200mm lenses.
    I want this camera to work well for me. I would not have bought it otherwise. I have better things to do with my time and money.
    hcubell
    www.howardcubell.com
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  12. #12
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Okay in my case and i started to write this but got distracted. For ME i have the D800E and lets be real here its a truck and like Marc his S2 is his biggest MPX sensor so we both sit in the same boat big heavy units that are awesome for many things but also for different types of work we have 1 or 2 ways in systems to go about work. Here is my issue I have this D800e for everything right now which in some areas its just a big gun I don't need . For instance i do NOT need a 36mpx horse to shoot PR, Runway, Fashion all overkill with a D800e. I shoot runway I use the DF settings on it for reach and smaller files. No event i shot EVER IN MY LIFE needed 36 mpx and Fashion stuff unless doing ad work I don't need it, I need it for landscape and advertising which is all on tripod and all manual everything with strobes or not. Hence my issue here why not use a small A7R in the later situations Im doing everything manual and its a small package to hike 3 miles and carry this stuff around, i use the same lenses as the Nikon uses as well. Drop the D800E out of my package add even a D7100 a 24-70 and 70-200 and that covers Af fast focusing runway work perfectly and PR work as well, You could add wedding guys in on this one as well and several other areas. Than take all my LOOK glass Leica 19, sigma 35mm, Nikon or Zeiss 50 or 55, Zeiss 135 and whatever floats my creative boat like replacing my zeiss 25mm F2 to use with it also. Now that sounds like a radical movement. But for some damn reason it actually makes sense to me. Other reason i think end of day the color and tone on this Sony will be better than my Nikon in C1, something I need to see first.

    I know exactly whats in Marcs head as he posted this as its the same in mine. What movement can i make if this turns into a gem that he can make that truly makes sense to us and how we work . I totally get this as i have the same rambling thoughts going.
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    760
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Marc .. Nice analysis… A couple of minor points. Buried in the menu you can set the LCD monitor to turn off after 10sec.. This seems to help with battery life. However, the time it takes for the camera to wake from sleep is really long-- longer than it takes from the time the camera is switched on from the off position. This is something which is quite annoying (although not a show stopper). Seems like this could be improved via a firmware update.

    I find the vibration issue to be lens dependent. My Nikkor 200mm AIS is heavy so when i used on an arca cube with the lens attached to the lens tripod foot --- really substantial issues at shutter speeds less than 1/100. However if i used the metabones foot to attach to the arca cube-- much less of an issue. Not an issue with the Nikkor 100mm macro. Will try the nikon 70-200/4 next.

    Maybe someone has commented on this but how does the Leica M 28-35-50mm perform on the A7r.

  14. #14
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by hcubell View Post
    I wouldn't think that the way to test for the effects of shutter vibration is to shoot three frames at 1/30, 1/8 and 1/5 and compare them. Those shutter speeds are all likely to be compromised by any shutter vibration, so they may look quite good in absolute terms, but not necessarily in relative terms compared to what the camera/lens is potentially capable of without the effects of any shutter vibration. OTOH, a frame at say 1/350 is unlikely to be compromised, and that frame would serve as a baseline to compare the frames shot at slower speeds.
    From what I understood, slow shutter speeds and faster shutter speeds were not the issue with longer lenses ... around 1/20 to 1/50 were. That's what I tested for.

    The problem of using 1/350 shutter is that it would require more light than the strobe modeling lights can deliver ... so you can't leave ISO and aperture the same, and vary the light levels for same exposure level at different shutter speeds.

    Can't use strobes either because shutter speed is mostly meaningless ... flash duration is faster than the max 1/180 sync speed of this camera ... or most any other focal plane shutter for that matter.

    - Marc
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    123
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by mark1958 View Post
    Marc .. Nice analysis… A couple of minor points. Buried in the menu you can set the LCD monitor to turn off after 10sec.. This seems to help with battery life. However, the time it takes for the camera to wake from sleep is really long-- longer than it takes from the time the camera is switched on from the off position. This is something which is quite annoying (although not a show stopper). Seems like this could be improved via a firmware update.
    I don't know if it's my settings (airplane mode, no auto-review, no eye-start, using manual focus lenses), or the SD card I use (SanDisk Extreme Pro 95MB/s). From a sleep state, holding the a7r to my eye, half pressing the shutter button, it's less than 2 seconds for the EVF to show the view. While instant would be nice, and I hope it's improved, under 2 seconds is something I can live with. The current time could also be mitigated if one half-presses the shutter button as the camera is being raised to the eye.

    For comparison, my 2 yr. old Sony a77's EVF awakens from sleep almost instantaneously. That was not the case when it was first released, but (as I recall) the 1st firmware update addressed the slower wake up time.

    Graham
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  16. #16
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Manchester/Jerusalem
    Posts
    2,652
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    290

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    OK I've mentioned some minuses on other threads, I'm going to take some time to gush a bit.

    Those of use who remember shooting with the SLR's they made till about mid '80's, this camera really is as close to those as anything made in the past two decades. The metal body and shape is just such a familiar feel in the hand, the shutter may be noisy but it's a mechanical noise not a high pitched whine or clack and it really is a joy to hold and work with. Couple of bits of gaffer over the writing on the front, an old lens and it really is an old SLR, people can't believe me when I tell them it's the latest digital camera from Sony! Friend had a new Fuji X-Pro1 he had just bought. Side by side the Fuji felt like a hollow plastic toy (going to get some stick for that ). My friends all agreed, this is what the Nikon DF should have been, what we expected from their ad's.

    Others have mentioned small, I've only got a few older older Takumars which are pretty small on it, once I've sold my DSLR lenses I will be looking for either a pre-asph 50mm 'lux or a 50mm sonnar (not decided yet) and then it really will be a tiny package. Compare it to even a small DSLR and the difference is ludicrous. It's really a joy to have in your bag or over your shoulder.

    For me I use auto iso in manual mode for most everything, aperture on the lens, shutter on the front dial and exposure compensation on top. It's just such a lovely way to shoot. All there where you want it and ignore all the funky stuff. Peaking is there though not as accurate as I would like no doubt due to low contrast lenses, magnification can be mapped to a zillion buttons, etc. I can access bracketing with a single button, it was a menu item on my canons.

    Guy's point which Marc mentions. I think it's important to note that when you want it to be and when you shoot it as you would a medium format camera, it can come close or perhaps even equal certain MF backs. However when you just want a small carry around camera, you're still getting as good as you would with almost every other camera on the market. Yes it will show hand held technique but so what? It will still be as good or even better than any lesser megapixelled camera shot using those same hands! It's a two faced camera. When you want to shoot casually it will equal or better every camera up to double it's size on the market. When you want to go serious it will equal or better cameras until now belonging to another league. So what's not to like at this price point and given just how small it is?

    My only big problem at present is the shutter lag. That's really bothering me. My focusing needs work but that's just a matter of practice with the peaking. I have a feeling shutter lag and wake up time will improve with firmware updates.

    Another thing, it's not just the resolution. This is a Pentax Super Takumar 35mm f2 wide open. Resolution almost non existent. Character and tonality - you judge...

    I am not a painter, nor an artist. Therefore I can see straight, and that may be my undoing. - Alfred Stieglitz

    Website: http://www.timelessjewishart.com
    Likes 4 Member(s) liked this post

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    MUC, Germany
    Posts
    615
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    ^
    Big +1 to that!
    Best regards - Hermann

  18. #18
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Im almost thinking of having both the 7 and the 7R. 7 for PR heavy AF cam and the 7r for real imaging ( big that is). Its the damn native lenses thats holding up the show.

    I wonder how fast the AF is on A 70-200
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  19. #19
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    Im almost thinking of having both the 7 and the 7R. 7 for PR heavy AF cam and the 7r for real imaging ( big that is). Its the damn native lenses thats holding up the show.

    I wonder how fast the AF is on A 70-200
    Gear Whore Alert!



    - Marc
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  20. #20
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Takes one to know one dude. So tell me how fast is the AF on the 70-200 A with adapter. Be really careful how you answer this as it may just cause a lot of head injuries to my freaking head. LOL
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  21. #21
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    Takes one to know one dude. So tell me how fast is the AF on the 70-200 A with adapter. Be really careful how you answer this as it may just cause a lot of head injuries to my freaking head. LOL


    I'll give it a try tomorrow Guy.

    - Marc

    Oh,oh, ... revised response ... I sold my 70-200/2.8G to Mikal some time ago. Somehow I read your request as 24-70 ??

    longest A lens I have is the ZA135/1.8. Sorry.

    -Marc
    Last edited by fotografz; 19th December 2013 at 00:24.

  22. #22
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    ROTFLMAO. This thing is too small to be real. I actually may need the grip just to feel like a big boy. Lol
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  23. #23
    Subscriber Member Georg Baumann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    787
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    82

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    ROTFLMAO. This thing is too small to be real. I actually may need the grip just to feel like a big boy. Lol
    The grip makes it a camera, without that it's nothing but a sensor holder. LOL Matter of taste of course, I quite like the classic design with the grip attached.

    Congrats on your newest Guy!

  24. #24
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Thanks Georg this is going to be fun. I might just order the dang grip.

    Does the grip have a tripod socket. I need to put a Arca plate on it
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  25. #25
    Subscriber Member Georg Baumann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    787
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    82

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    Thanks Georg this is going to be fun. I might just order the dang grip.

    Does the grip have a tripod socket. I need to put a Arca plate on it
    Doesn't say on the sony site, but I'd think so. There is also a A7 RRS bracket available.

    BA7-L Set: Includes Base + L-component - BA7-L-Set

  26. #26
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Thanks
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  27. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Massachusetts and Vermont
    Posts
    947
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by fotografz View Post
    From what I understood, slow shutter speeds and faster shutter speeds were not the issue with longer lenses ... around 1/20 to 1/50 were. That's what I tested for.

    The problem of using 1/350 shutter is that it would require more light than the strobe modeling lights can deliver ... so you can't leave ISO and aperture the same, and vary the light levels for same exposure level at different shutter speeds.

    Can't use strobes either because shutter speed is mostly meaningless ... flash duration is faster than the max 1/180 sync speed of this camera ... or most any other focal plane shutter for that matter.

    - Marc
    The tests of the effect of shutter vibration with longer lenses on the A7R that Lloyd chambers conducted compared faster shutter speeds ( 1/1F to 1/2F) with slower shutter speeds like 1/30, 1/15 and 1/8. Theses tests showed quite significant deterioration in image quality with the slower shutter speeds.

  28. #28
    Super Moderator Cindy Flood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,581
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    118

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    The grip does have a tripod socket.

  29. #29
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Howard honestly I am reading a lot on this subject and just the placement of either tripod mounted to lens or tripod mounted to adapter folks are getting different results. My theory believe a portion of what you read as the variables here in this case are fairly large. I will leave this up to user, there gear and technique as there is just too much involved with regards to it. I have run into this with several systems with focal plane shutters it's actually fairly common. The Phase DF for instance 1/15,1/8 and 1/20 it's pretty obvious your seeing a mirrored ghost. Frankly this has always been the case with focal plane shutters and there are many factors that either mask it well or expose it. In this case we have the addition of adapters and there is a variance in them as well not to mention your now using 4 mount points instead of 2. I believe there is a firmware fix that could help to some degree but it still won't completely fix it. Cameras with mass on one hand seem to do well but on the same token the DF has lots of mass and the issue is obvious with the 150 and 300 mm lenses. Again I think this case is all over the map.
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  30. #30
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cindy Flood View Post
    The grip does have a tripod socket.
    Love ya my dear.

    Might even be able to use my D800 L bracket on that
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  31. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    495
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    marc have you tested out the flash capabilities of the a7r?

  32. #32
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by ken_vs_ryu View Post
    marc have you tested out the flash capabilities of the a7r?
    I'll try it today ... going to devote as much time to screwing around with this camera as I can ... so I can make a decision and get back to living

    - Marc

  33. #33
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by Georg Baumann View Post
    Doesn't say on the sony site, but I'd think so. There is also a A7 RRS bracket available.

    BA7-L Set: Includes Base + L-component - BA7-L-Set
    Thing to check is if there is enough clearance for the articulated LCD. RRS doesn't show if there is on their site. Probably does, but worth a question.

    Regular ARCA plates bind the LCD.

    - Marc

  34. #34
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by mark1958 View Post
    Marc .. Nice analysis… A couple of minor points. Buried in the menu you can set the LCD monitor to turn off after 10sec.. This seems to help with battery life. However, the time it takes for the camera to wake from sleep is really long-- longer than it takes from the time the camera is switched on from the off position. This is something which is quite annoying (although not a show stopper). Seems like this could be improved via a firmware update.

    I find the vibration issue to be lens dependent. My Nikkor 200mm AIS is heavy so when i used on an arca cube with the lens attached to the lens tripod foot --- really substantial issues at shutter speeds less than 1/100. However if i used the metabones foot to attach to the arca cube-- much less of an issue. Not an issue with the Nikkor 100mm macro. Will try the nikon 70-200/4 next.

    Maybe someone has commented on this but how does the Leica M 28-35-50mm perform on the A7r.
    Thanks Mark.

    Yeah, I knew that from using the A99. I'll put up with it set to never to turn off while I'm in test mode.

    My longest lens is the ZA135/1.8, which is a pretty big lens in-itself ... the A7R and that lens is like an Ant dragging a Grasshopper

    - Marc

  35. #35
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    4,043
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1253

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    i've been doing detailed measuring for an L-plate of my own and even if the plate is 1/2" thick (can be hollowed out) the arca clamp it will interfere with full movement. instead of being inclined at 45 degrees down, which is the max, it will be about 30 degrees. the linked articulation will allow the movement, but the arca base gets in the way. what this means is when looking upwards into the LCD, it won't be as horizontal as you might like. bear in mind, this is probably when you would not be on a tripod anyway

    i am prototyping this week
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  36. #36
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Vivek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    13,603
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    21

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by jlm View Post
    i've been doing detailed measuring for an L-plate of my own and even if the plate is 1/2" thick (can be hollowed out) the arca clamp it will interfere with full movement. instead of being inclined at 45 degrees down, which is the max, it will be about 30 degrees. the linked articulation will allow the movement, but the arca base gets in the way. what this means is when looking upwards into the LCD, it won't be as horizontal as you might like. bear in mind, this is probably when you would not be on a tripod anyway

    i am prototyping this week
    PM sent with a suggestion.

  37. #37
    Senior Member Ron Pfister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    661
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Another suggestion: I've been thinking about L-plate designs for a while. Of the ones I own, the ones where the vertical mount is really sturdy enough for hi-res sensors are quite heavy. I would welcome a vertical mount that could be secured to the strap lug on the left side of the camera (with lens facing away from you), e.g. by pushing a stainless steel pin all the way through the plate rim (assuming it is hollowed-out). The connector doors would be unaffected by this. I think this would allow for a slimmer design that is much less prone to movement at the same time.

    Edit: to clarify, this would look like any L-plate we know, with the addition of the aforementioned pin, which would serve to anchor the loose end of the L.

  38. #38
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    4,043
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1253

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    ron (and anyone else)

    thx

    I'm open to suggestions, as this is at the design stage
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  39. #39
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Conflict Resolved!


    The A7R is going back to ...

  40. #40
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    MY GEAR VAULT!



    Here's why: Pardon my bluntness, I'm tired of all this "testy testing" business, but happy in the end.

    COLOR. Best out of camera color/contrast yet. What I had hoped the Leica M240 would've been ... and wasn't. Excellent AWB, great skin tones, superb color separation ... just wonderful color depth.

    GREAT DR ... yet Sony did it without the dull flat files that some claim as necessary to retain DR ... then requiring a boat load of post work to get to where this camera is right out of the camera.

    HIGH ISO. I process a lot of stuff from different cameras (assistants/second shooter's stuff), this camera wipes the floor with most if not all of them. ISO 2500 is the new 800. Color stays true right up to ISO 5000 or even 6400. NO BANDING in sight. Almost unbelievable to those who shot with a A900.

    Most Leica M lenses work for me, the 21/1.4 ASPH is excellent as is the M75/2AA and stalwart 90/2.8, my non-FLE 35/1.4 ASPH is fine and the 28/2 ASPH not as horrifyingly disgusting as I was led to believe. ... but what counts most is that there are no caveats at all using the M50/0.95 ... and that one is all I needed to make this worth it.

    The A7R with the LAEA4 adapter
    is okay with some lenses, but extremely fast focusing with any ZA or Sony lenses sporting SSW (Super Sonic Wave AF motor) My ZA24/2 and ZA50/1.4 are lighting quick ... and I tried a few shots on moving people and speeding cars and nailed it on the money every time ... no lag, no screwing around ... aim, shoot, done.

    Still not 100% sure about shutter shock ... but the adapted A mounts do not show it.


    Lastly, more fun per dollar than any camera I can recall.

    A big welcome to the family for ... "Mighty Mouse".

    - Marc
    Last edited by fotografz; 20th December 2013 at 01:35.
    Likes 4 Member(s) liked this post

  41. #41
    Senior Member Show Performance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    851
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    5

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    Takes one to know one dude. So tell me how fast is the AF on the 70-200 A with adapter. Be really careful how you answer this as it may just cause a lot of head injuries to my freaking head. LOL
    Guy,

    I don't have the 70-200 but I do have the 200mm APO with LAEA-4 and it is just as fast as on my A900, maybe quicker. Killer lens too.

    Chad

  42. #42
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    A few other shots (and crops) that helped me make the leap.

    Took the A7R with ZA24/2 to the Market and did some snaps mostly at higher ISOs ... a few action people shots to check against lag or slow AF ... it suffered neither.

    Tree ornament shots done with the Nocti ... notably one at 1/25th shutter.

    Not sure it'll come across in web sized shots, but I'm seeing M9 like color response but with greater DR and much better ISO performance.

    Lots to learn yet, more improvements to be had ... but enough promise to keep it.

    - Marc
    Likes 4 Member(s) liked this post

  43. #43
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    123
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Marc,

    I agree with your conclusions, especially your high ISO observation regarding a900 users (I use an a850).

    As far as your posts to this thread, you do have a little drama in you don't you? ;-)

    Graham
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  44. #44
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by Show Performance View Post
    Guy,

    I don't have the 70-200 but I do have the 200mm APO with LAEA-4 and it is just as fast as on my A900, maybe quicker. Killer lens too.

    Chad
    Thank you . I had that lens at one time it was lightning quick.

    Everything comes tomorrow. I'll get out and play.

    I do have a question on the adapter. Do I need the LAEa-4. This one confused me.

    I'm renting the Nikon 70- 200 but I can change that order from lensrentals. I need advice on what to get. There are 2 zooms, maybe the 200. I'm at the long end for 15k shots doing runway . The high ISO is needed at 1600 or more.

    Marc seriously your comments and conclusion was not a surprise at all and truthfully what I expected. I like my Nikon but there is no love. Tough decisions for me and I'm really tempted to fire sale it all. Keep my Leica r19 and Zeiss 135 than rebuild. Also add the 7 and dump the Nikon 5200 too. My head is spinning let me get some shots in and see what I come up with. Thanks Guys
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  45. #45
    Senior Member mjm6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    526
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    15

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    ROTFLMAO. This thing is too small to be real. I actually may need the grip just to feel like a big boy. Lol
    As I have been testing out the new camera here, the M lenses all feel fine without the grip. With the R lenses I have, including the R 19mm, 28mm, 35mm, 50mm, the camera starts to feel like it is a bit too small to attain real comfort without the grip (which I don't have at the moment).

    It may be an issue of getting used to it (I haven't had a camera this small since the Canon A-1 20+ years ago; even my F-1's at that time had the motor drives attached all the time).

    But, I sure do feel like I'm going to like this camera! If I can feel happy with my M lenses on it, I'll be seriously cooking with gas.

    I especially appreciate Marc's comments on the camera, as his comments confirmed some aspects of the a900 back when it was first introduced that I had felt, in particular the color rendering, so I am very interested in what he finds in time.


    ---Michael
    a7r, a7rII, FE 16-35, FE 24-70GM, FE 70-200, Loxia 21mm, 35mm, 50mm

  46. #46
    Senior Member Ron Pfister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    661
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    I agree that giving it some time is the way to go, Michael. I'm using many of the same lenses you are, and think the A7R is just fine without a grip. I firmly believe the size-advantage outweighs anything else. E.g. with the grip, I would likely have to use a larger bag than I use now (TT Retro 5), and that's not going to happen - for general use, at least.

  47. #47
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by GrahamB View Post
    Marc,

    I agree with your conclusions, especially your high ISO observation regarding a900 users (I use an a850).

    As far as your posts to this thread, you do have a little drama in you don't you? ;-)

    Graham
    He, he, he,

    All my drama has been a deliberately facetious reaction to some of the hyped-up, adrenaline stoking, polarizing threads and posts this thing has generated.

    It is just a freaking camera for crikey sake!

    But it's what we do I guess ... part of the addiction

    Have a Happy Holiday or a Merry Christmas everyone. It is looking like a very good new year.

    Back to wrapping gifts.

    - Marc
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  48. #48
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Manchester/Jerusalem
    Posts
    2,652
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    290

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Just a camera to you Marc but it's the smallest freaking thing I've ever had in my carry everywhere bag, you're used to Leica's but I've only ever had DSLR's in this thing and it's so incredibly light that half the time I wonder if I forgot to put it in!
    I am not a painter, nor an artist. Therefore I can see straight, and that may be my undoing. - Alfred Stieglitz

    Website: http://www.timelessjewishart.com
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  49. #49
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Vivek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    13,603
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    21

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by GrahamB View Post
    Marc,

    I agree with your conclusions, especially your high ISO observation regarding a900 users (I use an a850).

    As far as your posts to this thread, you do have a little drama in you don't you? ;-)

    Graham
    The drama would have been even more had he downloaded the new app and checked out some of his wider M lenses. May be we will see that in a few months.

    So, what happened to your M10 tests, Marc? Are you keeping that or sending it back?

  50. #50
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Most "Conflicted" Camera Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Rubinstein View Post
    Just a camera to you Marc but it's the smallest freaking thing I've ever had in my carry everywhere bag, you're used to Leica's but I've only ever had DSLR's in this thing and it's so incredibly light that half the time I wonder if I forgot to put it in!
    I'm not "belittling" it Ben, it's size IS the reason it is so darned appealing ... it's the camera with a Napoleon complex ... "I may be small, but I'll kick your Camera's a$$ into the next century!" ...

    BTW, I'll PM you on the lag and AF discussion.

    - Marc

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •