Site Sponsors
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 51 to 92 of 92

Thread: Leica R lenses?

  1. #51
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    353
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Join the club.

    My haul from the past week, last two for my long term "heritage" collection:

    Sony FE 24-70
    Leica R 80MM Summilux
    Leica R 100MM APO Macro

    Now I did sell off my M9 + 35 Summicron ASPH, so I was able to rationalize the purchase.

    Quote Originally Posted by Godfrey View Post
    In a horrifying moment of weakness yesterday, I ordered one of these lenses—in the box with hood, caps, etc—at a price I can rationalize as being worth it and affordable. Ugh.

    Hanging out with this crowd of equipment magpies is a dangerous business. ;-)

    Anyway, I couldn't possibly rationalize the cost of a series II model and it wouldn't work on my Leicaflex SL bodies anyway. It was not cheap, but it wasn't "break the bank" expensive.

    These moments of weakness come from working my butt off and seeking escape in shopping therapy. They'd be less frequent if I didn't work so much. Of course I wouldn't have the money then either. Hmm ... =8^O

    NOW I really really have to start selling some of the excess unused gear around here... !

  2. #52
    Senior Member alajuela's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Shanghai / Miami
    Posts
    552
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    124

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Hi

    I have what will probably be considered a dumb question.

    Here goes - why would you consider an R lens as opposed to a M lens?

    Thanks

    Phil

  3. #53
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    250
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    R lenses are equally good in performance and usually cheaper than similar M lens. Also R series has longer alternatives. Technically the R series are a better fit, especially for focal lengths below 50mm due longer flange to sensor distance.

    Many of the wider M lenses aren't really suited for the 7's causing weird coloring and smeared corners in pictures.

    In practise slr lenses work better than rangefinder lenses for 50 and below, regardless of the lens brand.

    //Juha
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  4. #54
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    353
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Not at all, no question is dumb. I can only give my perspective - I cannot adapt M lenses on DSLRs, hence R lenses are preferable in some cases for me in case I want to go to a 50MP Nikon when it comes out. Other reason is that most R wides work well on mirrorless. Most M wides are horrible on anything other than a Leica M. Price is another consideration - in some cases R lenses are cheaper than M counterparts with no loss in IQ.

    For the two R lenses I bought above, I feel they are truly unique and best of the best so when the opportunity arose I bought them. Again, my personal subjective opinion.

    Hope this helps.

    Eeraj

  5. #55
    Senior Member alajuela's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Shanghai / Miami
    Posts
    552
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    124

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by jlindstrom View Post
    R lenses are equally good in performance and usually cheaper than similar M lens. Also R series has longer alternatives. Technically the R series are a better fit, especially for focal lengths below 50mm due longer flange to sensor distance.

    Many of the wider M lenses aren't really suited for the 7's causing weird coloring and smeared corners in pictures.

    In practise slr lenses work better than rangefinder lenses for 50 and below, regardless of the lens brand.

    //Juha
    Quote Originally Posted by jaree View Post
    Not at all, no question is dumb. I can only give my perspective - I cannot adapt M lenses on DSLRs, hence R lenses are preferable in some cases for me in case I want to go to a 50MP Nikon when it comes out. Other reason is that most R wides work well on mirrorless. Most M wides are horrible on anything other than a Leica M. Price is another consideration - in some cases R lenses are cheaper than M counterparts with no loss in IQ.

    For the two R lenses I bought above, I feel they are truly unique and best of the best so when the opportunity arose I bought them. Again, my personal subjective opinion.

    Hope this helps.

    Eeraj
    Thank you Juha and Eeraj - I am assuming with introduction or Fuji and Sony, Along with Canon / Nikon option, they won't stay cheap for long.

    I am thinking about the 80mm Lux, I have the Canon 85 1.2 - the Lux will render different I suppose.

    Thanks again.

    Phil

  6. #56
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,446
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    the 80mm lux will render differently from the Canon 85 1.2 since one is 1.2 and the other is 1.4

  7. #57
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Also the lenses are different in design as well the 80 lux being a Mandler design when wide open will have more lens aberrations but thats what gives it the look. Lets not forget lens coatings here as well. Canon being a more modern lens coatings
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  8. #58
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Godfrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near San Jose, California
    Posts
    7,927
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by alajuela View Post
    I have what will probably be considered a dumb question.
    Here goes - why would you consider an R lens as opposed to a M lens?
    Not a dumb question at all.

    - Adapting SLR lenses proves more compatible with large sensors than adapting RF lenses. This is a side effect of the necessity to design them for a deep mount register to clear the swinging mirror.

    - Leica R lenses are in many cases as good or better performers than Leica M lenses. In fact, since I really only have rather old M lenses or Voigtländers, my R lenses are in most cases better performers.

    - I bought the Leicaflex SL body and most of these lenses last year to shoot with them on film and hoped to use them as telephoto lenses on smaller format bodies. I found I missed having their designed capabilities expressed in the full format they were intended for ... that's why I bought the A7. I will never buy a Sony lens for the A7, my intent is purely to use it as a "one-size-fits-all" replacement for SLR cameras.

    G
    Godfrey - GDGPhoto Flickr Stream
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  9. #59
    Senior Member alajuela's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Shanghai / Miami
    Posts
    552
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    124

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by Godfrey View Post
    Not a dumb question at all.

    - Adapting SLR lenses proves more compatible with large sensors than adapting RF lenses. This is a side effect of the necessity to design them for a deep mount register to clear the swinging mirror.

    - Leica R lenses are in many cases as good or better performers than Leica M lenses. In fact, since I really only have rather old M lenses or Voigtländers, my R lenses are in most cases better performers.

    - I bought the Leicaflex SL body and most of these lenses last year to shoot with them on film and hoped to use them as telephoto lenses on smaller format bodies. I found I missed having their designed capabilities expressed in the full format they were intended for ... that's why I bought the A7. I will never buy a Sony lens for the A7, my intent is purely to use it as a "one-size-fits-all" replacement for SLR cameras.

    G
    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    Also the lenses are different in design as well the 80 lux being a Mandler design when wide open will have more lens aberrations but thats what gives it the look. Lets not forget lens coatings here as well. Canon being a more modern lens coatings
    Thank you all, in Summary it appears that;

    1. If you have the M with new M lenses, then mounting a R lens you might get a slightly different look due to the coatings, but image quality might (at least in the wides) would be at best marginally better. Of course you now have a larger, and heavier lens.

    2. The R have the advantage of being "portable" to a Canon or Fuji with a simple converter. While still not really "cheaper" than a "L" lens, the R are extremely sharp and have that "Leica" look.

    I think for me at least, I will keep me eyes open for a good opportunity on a R lens with the Canon and Fuji in mind.

    The information here - and the lists will become a cheat sheet on the ins and outs of R line.

    Thanks so much for sharing

    Phil

  10. #60
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    330
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    130

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Some R lenses (e.g. 50 summicron) can be easier to handle than their M (v4 Summicron) counterparts IMO.
    I never liked the small amount of play with my Leitaxed R lenses for Nikon and converted them all back to original mounts

  11. #61
    Subscriber Member dunders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Isle of Man
    Posts
    81
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    29

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by Godfrey View Post
    In a horrifying moment of weakness yesterday, I ordered one of these lenses!
    As Ms Whiteadder might say: WICKED CHILD!
    Paul.... lost in the Irish Sea

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dunders/

  12. #62
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Godfrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near San Jose, California
    Posts
    7,927
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by dunders View Post
    As Ms Whiteadder might say: WICKED CHILD!
    It was ever thus. :-) The Elmarit should be here about the end of next week.

  13. #63
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,446
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by Godfrey View Post
    It was ever thus. :-) The Elmarit should be here about the end of next week.
    Exciting times ahead! think we may have to start up a Elmarit 19mm on Sony thread.

  14. #64
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Jerusalem, Israel
    Posts
    1,281
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    The Elmarit-R 19 prices that Thorsten Overgaard quotes in the 2010 article linked a few times below have a very nice historical feel to them. Well before the M announcement and long after the DMRs had vanished, he notes that the version 1 could be had used for $1100-1400 and the version 2 topped out at $2000. A few unopened new version 2's he reported as discounted to $3500. On EBay today, the version 1 shows up still at $1200-1600, but the version 2's are up to the low to mid $3000s. From the picture that appears earlier in this thread, the version 1 is HUGE, so I can see why the 2's are market leaders. But if they are still not catching up to the price when new, maybe there remains an investment upside. And for use on an M, there is the possibility that the firmware correction handles the slight distortion that Guy points to at the start of this thread, HMMM....

    scott

  15. #65
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Folks remember PT lens plug in supports the version Ii distortion. I sent files in to the developer to build a profile for it. Takes seconds to correct in PS. They have many lenses built into the database and if not there are instructions on shooting a couple frames to send into the developer and he will build a profile for it. Works very nice
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  16. #66
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    I'm excited to see what Godfrey comes up with version 1. Its most likely corners and such but it looks to have a nice look and sometimes that is far more important than technical prowess . That's why many of us bought Lux lenses wide open technically they are not great but the look is . Stopped Down they are lasers.

    Buying lenses is a art within itself.
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  17. #67
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by scott kirkpatrick View Post
    The Elmarit-R 19 prices that Thorsten Overgaard quotes in the 2010 article linked a few times below have a very nice historical feel to them. Well before the M announcement and long after the DMRs had vanished, he notes that the version 1 could be had used for $1100-1400 and the version 2 topped out at $2000. A few unopened new version 2's he reported as discounted to $3500. On EBay today, the version 1 shows up still at $1200-1600, but the version 2's are up to the low to mid $3000s. From the picture that appears earlier in this thread, the version 1 is HUGE, so I can see why the 2's are market leaders. But if they are still not catching up to the price when new, maybe there remains an investment upside. And for use on an M, there is the possibility that the firmware correction handles the slight distortion that Guy points to at the start of this thread, HMMM....

    scott
    We all know who wrote the DMR bible right. LOL
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  18. #68
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Godfrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near San Jose, California
    Posts
    7,927
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by scott kirkpatrick View Post
    The Elmarit-R 19 ... the version 1 is HUGE ...
    As I mentioned in the picture thread, I also picked up a Nikkor 18mm f/3.5 AI-S yesterday, quite on an impulse. I remembered this lens from years ago as being a very good performer, etc, and the price it was going for was almost silly-cheap. It's a much smaller lens, at least it is until you fit the lens hood when the front of it becomes a rather large dish.

    I did some quick snaps with it around the condo last evening and it proves to be quite the nice performer in close even wide open. It will be fun to see how it compares to the Elmarit 19 series I.

    I don't there's all that much to be gained by thinking of lenses as investments. I think of them as tools. Prices float up and down when they get old enough, but basically they*just depreciate over time through use and age. They only spike up when some current fashion puts them in the limelight for a bit, and if they're particularly rare or desirable at that moment.

    G
    Godfrey - GDGPhoto Flickr Stream
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  19. #69
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,446
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    nice Godfrey, look forward to seeing comparisons as well

    I have the large bulbous Nikkor 15mm f3.5 manual focus lens. Guess that will not compare well with the Elmarit 19mm since it is a very different focal length. Plus it was never a stellar performer wide open at the corners.

  20. #70
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    250
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    R lenses galore and more so.. I just purchased a nice condition R8 also for a measily 400usd. Nice condition, manuals, showcase box etc included. So next week I'll have the summicron R 50 and the R8!

    Actually I'll offload the R8 at matching price to a friend who shoots loads of film. I just have 2-3 rolls in my drawers, so I'll push those through just for the experience. It'll be interesting to try one.

    //Juha

  21. #71
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    363
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    I wonder how sales of adapters are going these days, and which mounts are selling. Truly these are the salad days of alternative lens use - we are spoilt for choice! It's a big step forward for photography in the enthusiast category.

  22. #72
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    250
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Just received my 50 Summicron-R. It is in a great shape, no nasty dings or anything.. focus is buttery smooth and aperture clicks are nice & snappy. It was the lovely Leica sensation I got used to with my previous M-lenses. Excellent stuff and to think I got it for measily 250 euros.. R-Fever!!!!

    Need to do some testing with it later today and this week.

    //Juha

  23. #73
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Godfrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near San Jose, California
    Posts
    7,927
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    I've been trying out the Nokton 40mm f/1.4 MC and M-Rokkor 40mm f/2 gen II on the A7.

    I did a tripod-mounted edge and corner test of both last night. Both show falloff wide open and down to f/2.8. The Nokton shows unsharpness and smearing until f/5.6. The M-Rokkor does not show smearing even wide open, and is sharp at the corners by f/2.8-4. The M-Rokkor "feels" sharper immediately as I focus it too.

    One thing curious with both is that I find them a bit fiddly to focus, mechanically. The focusing ring is quite close to the body and finding the focusing tab does not feel natural on the A7 as it does on the M9. The big Elmarit-R lenses are just nicer to use on this camera, to me anyway.

    G

  24. #74
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Godfrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near San Jose, California
    Posts
    7,927
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by jlindstrom View Post
    Just received my 50 Summicron-R. It is in a great shape, no nasty dings or anything.. focus is buttery smooth and aperture clicks are nice & snappy. It was the lovely Leica sensation I got used to with my previous M-lenses. Excellent stuff and to think I got it for measily 250 euros.. R-Fever!!!!

    Need to do some testing with it later today and this week.
    You will love it! The Summicron-R 50mm is sharp wide open and has a beautiful rendering signature. It's quite different from the equally lovely Summilux-R 50mm too. I need to have my Summicron 50 CLA'ed ... the focus helicoid grease is old and stiff.

    Yes, R lens fever ... !

  25. #75
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    250
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Been doing a tiny bit of testing and it's looking good. The long focus throw takes a bit getting used to, but otherwise smooth sailing. The magnification makes focusing easy, as long as your iso is decent and the screen doesn't have to massively gain. Even when it gets grainy, it's still ok'ish to focus.

    And the ability to place magnification window where you need it, is a real killer feature!

    //Juha

  26. #76
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Godfrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near San Jose, California
    Posts
    7,927
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Meditating on my testing of the Nokton and M-Rokkor last evening, and using the Nokton over the weekend.

    I'm ready to just toss in the towel on using M-mount lenses on the A7/A7r entirely. My longer lenses ... the M-Rokkor 90 and Hektor 135 ... work well enough, but none of the Color Skopars really sing, the Ultron is a mushy mess most of the time, the Nokton 40 is great if you ignore the corners or stop it down to slower than a Color Skopar, the M-Rokkor 40 is better than that, and the Nokton 50/1.5 (LTM) is only just "ok", it does not perform like either the Summicron-R 50 or Summilux-R 50 do. I don't even like using the 40s on this body ... the ergonomics are poor due to the position of the focusing ring and tab.

    I might just keep the M-Rokkor 40 on the CL body where it belongs, sell the Nokton 40, and find a Summicron-R 35 for this slot in my lens kit. My A7 will be an all-Leica-R lineup, with a couple of specialty Nikkors complementing it.

    G

  27. #77
    Senior Subscriber Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    411
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    I totally agree with you about NOT using M lenses on A7r/A7. For me, it's Leica-R lenses all the way. I also highly recommend the 35 Summicron-R which has a very nice and smooth rendering style.

    Quote Originally Posted by Godfrey View Post
    Meditating on my testing of the Nokton and M-Rokkor last evening, and using the Nokton over the weekend.

    I'm ready to just toss in the towel on using M-mount lenses on the A7/A7r entirely. My longer lenses ... the M-Rokkor 90 and Hektor 135 ... work well enough, but none of the Color Skopars really sing, the Ultron is a mushy mess most of the time, the Nokton 40 is great if you ignore the corners or stop it down to slower than a Color Skopar, the M-Rokkor 40 is better than that, and the Nokton 50/1.5 (LTM) is only just "ok", it does not perform like either the Summicron-R 50 or Summilux-R 50 do. I don't even like using the 40s on this body ... the ergonomics are poor due to the position of the focusing ring and tab.

    I might just keep the M-Rokkor 40 on the CL body where it belongs, sell the Nokton 40, and find a Summicron-R 35 for this slot in my lens kit. My A7 will be an all-Leica-R lineup, with a couple of specialty Nikkors complementing it.

    G

  28. #78
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    250
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Ok, so it was getting dark already by the time I had a chance to do some test shots. And I'm in charge of entertaining my daughter this evening as well, since wife is at work..

    So, the following shots are pretty silly really but figured I'll post some first samples anyway. I'm liking what I'm seeing. It's starting to look like I'll need R-line to complement my native FE lenses. And you can get some real gems dirt cheap with the R lenses too!

    And I'll apologise in advance, since I think I missed the focus ever so slightly with my daughters picture.. So, here goes nothing:







    //Juha
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  29. #79
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    540
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    very nice, if I want to get 2 or 3 R lenses, should I get the ROM version only, or the others also OK with the A7&A7R? There is a big price difference.

  30. #80
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Others are okay but will depend on the lens as well as formula's change. Buying R glass like all Leica glass you need to know what to look for. Personally i would not go older than 3 cam versions but that is just a general feeling more than anything else as some old stuff is damn good.


    Some general thoughts on Leica R

    Crons are very sharp and have nice contrast. Boarder line clinical in look but depends on lens too. F2

    Summilux are all Mandler design usually have a great look wide open but with lens aberrations wide open. Lets call it a more veiling look but stopped down very very good. Its what we call a two for one lens. They are all 1.4 and bigger as well and all Crons are F2

    Elmarits are all 2.8 and usually very competent lenses if not outstanding like my 19mm since they are 2.8 are easier to design and usually smaller as well. Also will not have that veiling look like the Lux glass.

    2 really great elmarits are the late version of the 28mm 2.8 and the 19mm 2.8.

    The great Lux glass are several the 35mm 1.4 , 50 1.4 and the 80 Lux is maybe the sweetheart for many folks.

    Crons 35mm Cron is a outstanding lens and so is the 90mm Cron. The 50 cron is also very nice

    sleeper lens is the 60mm macro

    Just some random thoughts

    Long glass the 180mm F2 cron is amazing but so is the 2.8 Apo
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  31. #81
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    250
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    2-cam, 3-cam or ROM doesn't make any difference for adapted. What does is the version of the lens. ROM versions are usually latest & greatest, but not always! So you need to a) decide your wanted focal, b) check which version is the best or is good enough for you, c) browse ebay & likes searching for suitable lens and then d) check the lenses serial number against Leica wiki database to make sure it's the desired version.

    Sounds like trouble but is actually fast operation once you get a hang of it. And outside the exotic models, there are really nice & classic lenses available cheap as chips!

    //Juha

  32. #82
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,446
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by Godfrey View Post
    Meditating on my testing of the Nokton and M-Rokkor last evening, and using the Nokton over the weekend.

    I'm ready to just toss in the towel on using M-mount lenses on the A7/A7r entirely. My longer lenses ... the M-Rokkor 90 and Hektor 135 ... work well enough, but none of the Color Skopars really sing, the Ultron is a mushy mess most of the time, the Nokton 40 is great if you ignore the corners or stop it down to slower than a Color Skopar, the M-Rokkor 40 is better than that, and the Nokton 50/1.5 (LTM) is only just "ok", it does not perform like either the Summicron-R 50 or Summilux-R 50 do. I don't even like using the 40s on this body ... the ergonomics are poor due to the position of the focusing ring and tab.

    I might just keep the M-Rokkor 40 on the CL body where it belongs, sell the Nokton 40, and find a Summicron-R 35 for this slot in my lens kit. My A7 will be an all-Leica-R lineup, with a couple of specialty Nikkors complementing it.

    G
    Godfrey, was wondering have you had the opportinuity to test the VC 15mm ultra wide heliar on the A7(r)? Does that lens get mushy in the corners?

  33. #83
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Godfrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near San Jose, California
    Posts
    7,927
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by jlindstrom View Post
    2-cam, 3-cam or ROM doesn't make any difference for adapted. What does is the version of the lens. ROM versions are usually latest & greatest, but not always! So you need to a) decide your wanted focal, b) check which version is the best or is good enough for you, c) browse ebay & likes searching for suitable lens and then d) check the lenses serial number against Leica wiki database to make sure it's the desired version.
    I am sticking with 2-cam and 3-cam lenses since I want them to work with my Leicaflex SL as well as the A7.

    I check the Leica Wiki for serial number/date/model ... seems to be "mostly" right but as has been pointed out by Doug Herr, there are definitely errors in the listings. I also look at Erwin Puts's leica lens book, but you have to take what he says with a certain mindset as what he calls 'some minor issue' is often in any other lens manufacturers' line a quality that can only be dreamed about. They just don't have the Leica Fairy Dust™ manufacturing facility. ;-)

    Hopefully the Elmarit-R 19 will be here around the end of the week, otherwise next week.

    G

  34. #84
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Godfrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near San Jose, California
    Posts
    7,927
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by mazor View Post
    Godfrey, was wondering have you had the opportinuity to test the VC 15mm ultra wide heliar on the A7(r)? Does that lens get mushy in the corners?
    I don't have the Heliar 15mm ... I had one in the late 1990s and used it on my CL, but that's about as recent as my direct experience with it was. It was a good lens and fun to shoot with, but frankly even on film the corners and edges tended to be pretty mushy. I remember comparing it against the (admittedly much more expensive) Hologon 16 T* for the Contax G and there was absolutely no contention as to which was a far better performer.

    I wouldn't bother with one for the A7/A7r. If the cost of an Elmarit-19 is out of reach, look for a Nikkor 18mm f/3.5 AI-S. I am stunned with how nicely this relatively inexpensive lens works on the A7. No smearing, and sharp right to the corners at f/5.6. Very little (and easily corrected) barrel distortion too.

    I see a good number of them with poor cosmetics on Ebay for $450-550. The one I bought is near mint condition and, with the HK-9 hood, only slightly more than that.

  35. #85
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,446
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    nice Godfrey, I have the VC UW heliar 15mm which I use on the NEX. thanks to the APS-C crop it becomes a 22mm effective but since it is using the best part of the lens, I get excellent corner performance wide open at 4.5 and minimal to no magenta casting thanks to the well designed Sony 16Mp sensor. Another good thing is that even though the 15mm is a FF lens, it is so amazingly tiny compared to most e-mount lens.

  36. #86
    Subscriber Member dunders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Isle of Man
    Posts
    81
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    29

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Re: CV 4.5/15

    I have tried it on the A7r. It is useable if you use one of the correction programs. I have looked at C1, Cornerfix and the the in-camera 'lens compensation' app. It's a whole layer of faff I can do without, but it obviously works and is acceptable for others.

    I wouldn't like to use these lenses with the A7r for colour work, but I'm debating keeping the lenses just for B&W work: given the right subject they seem to do well.

    I did try a couple of 'quick and dirty' B&Ws, one with the 4.5/15 using C1:

    Ben Maye in Ramsey Harbour | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

    the other with the 4/21, using 'lens compensation':

    Ballaterson | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

    When the weather improves I'll do some more rigorous testing using the in-camera app.
    Paul.... lost in the Irish Sea

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dunders/

  37. #87
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Godfrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near San Jose, California
    Posts
    7,927
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by dunders View Post
    ...
    I have tried it on the A7r. It is useable if you use one of the correction programs. I have looked at C1, Cornerfix and the the in-camera 'lens compensation' app. It's a whole layer of faff I can do without, but it obviously works and is acceptable for others.

    I wouldn't like to use these lenses with the A7r for colour work, but I'm debating keeping the lenses just for B&W work: given the right subject they seem to do well. ...
    Nice pix!

    That's a good point about using these lenses for B&W only. Forgetting about color solves a lot of the color shift problems... :-)

    On a side note: in doing the testing with the Nokton and M-Rokkor 40mm lenses the other night, I had the chance to try out the Novoflex ASTAT/NEX tripod adapter with their M->NEX adapter. It does work well, although fitting it to the camera and then changing lenses is a bit fiddly because the tripod mount's clamp on the adapter nearly covers the lens release button. I found a little stub of a popsicle stick with the end whittled into a short tongue made it a lot easier to depress the lens release button so that I could change lenses.

    The Nikon F and Leica R to NEX adapters are quite a lot longer so this issue with the ASTAT tripod adapter doesn't happen with them.

  38. #88
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    330
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    130

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Godfrey - there's a simple work-around with the problem you have with the ASTAT/Nex - see post 115 here: http://www.getdpi.com/forum/sony/493...-thread-3.html

  39. #89
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Godfrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near San Jose, California
    Posts
    7,927
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by Shac View Post
    Godfrey - there's a simple work-around with the problem you have with the ASTAT/Nex - see post 115 here: http://www.getdpi.com/forum/sony/493...-thread-3.html
    Mine looks like the "current" model, but the clamping bolt on mine is secured with an external nut rather than being threaded into the surrounding metal*of the clamp. I only use the ASTAT when I'm using the tripod ... it's off the camera any other time ... so I leave it with the clamping bolt down. This allows the camera to rotate from landscape to portrait orientation anticlockwise (looking from the rear) without interfering with anything.

    But that wasn't what I was talking about. The Novoflex NEX/LEM adapter is rather short and the lens release button fits into a recess in the adapter. When you fit the ASTAT, the clamping ring mostly covers the lens release recess, so when you fit a lens there's precious little access to the lens release to change lenses. My little wooden tool lets me press the lens release button to change lenses more easily. :-)

    G

    woo hoo! just got a note that the Elmarit-R 19mm will be here on Friday from the post office.

  40. #90
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,446
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Godfrey looking forward to seeing some Elmarit 19mm in action. Took last weekends breakfast with the Elmarit 19 version 1


  41. #91
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    330
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    130

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    Godfrey - OK - apologies -I need to read more carefully

  42. #92
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    250
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Leica R lenses?

    One quick shot from yesterday, old town of Tallin in Estonia. Staight out of camera, no processing at all. Transferred with Playmemories over wifi to my iPad, so resolution etc accordingly :-)

    Anyway, taken with A7r + 50/2 Summicron R and cheap chinese adapter.



    //Juha
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •