wallpaperviking
Member
Fair enough, I did read that..
You did also say "If I were to have one, the Rodenstock 50mm and Nikon 14-24mm are the lenses to go with the camera" and that is why I asked the question..
Seeing as you have had access to one, do you see it being possible to attach Canon Eos lenses, if you were to use them with a preset aperture? That is with a bit of custom machining of course
I ask because there is only a 2.5mm flange distance difference between Canon Eos (44mm) and Nikon F (46.5mm).
Also, I don't quite understand the Leica M39 mount.. It is stated as having a flange distance of 28.80mm. I would assume movements would be extremely limited with this and am not even sure that they project a bigger enough image circle to be useful..
Or were there other lenses that were made in this mount with larger image circles?
Ok, thanks a lot, look forward to hearing your thoughts..
You did also say "If I were to have one, the Rodenstock 50mm and Nikon 14-24mm are the lenses to go with the camera" and that is why I asked the question..
Seeing as you have had access to one, do you see it being possible to attach Canon Eos lenses, if you were to use them with a preset aperture? That is with a bit of custom machining of course
I ask because there is only a 2.5mm flange distance difference between Canon Eos (44mm) and Nikon F (46.5mm).
Also, I don't quite understand the Leica M39 mount.. It is stated as having a flange distance of 28.80mm. I would assume movements would be extremely limited with this and am not even sure that they project a bigger enough image circle to be useful..
Or were there other lenses that were made in this mount with larger image circles?
Ok, thanks a lot, look forward to hearing your thoughts..