johnnygoesdigital
New member
Yes something like a d4 or d610 might be better for sports, but more often than not I'm hiking with a pack of gear, snowboards, poles, strobes, modifiers, etc, so the A7 's size is perfect. I would choose a prime over a zoom most every time because the rendering, IMO, is always better - pure physics. For printing up to 20x30 or for editorial work, the Fuji XT1 is a much better choice for me. It shoots at 8fps and can go to 1/32,000 via the elec. shutter and the latest firmware. Fuji may have released the X before the A7, but their lens roadmap made it clear they were going for a more advanced base. The A7 will have some new offerings in the wide FL with converters ?!So again a pro DSLR is the best choice for what you describe and the lenses are already there. Based on user reports I've read as well as my own personal hands on experience with a XT-1 I don't think the Fuji AF will be accurate enough for what you want. The AF from the OM-D for instance is noticeably faster and more accurate. The next step from there is to go to pro Canon or Nikon bodies.
The 14mm 2.8 prime was released quickly with the Fujifilm X and although not what I consider fast, it still appeals to many landscape/ sport shooters and is considerably better than anything that the FE has right now. That's how you establish a fan base. Until Sony has some primes that will appeal to my style of shooting I'll wait, but in the meantime, i'm grateful there's so many other options. Someday I would like to get the A9, as that might be what I've been waiting for all along.
Last edited: