ShooterSteve
New member
Opinions wanted please...
I've been loving my A7R which i purchased after a quick test with my Canon TS-E lenses. I had been using a D800E with the Nikon 24 Shift and the Nikon 14-24 for my work up to that point. The Canon lenses and the friendliness of the Sony digital viewfinder, tilting screen are just wonderful for architecture and landscapes. My question is this: everyone criticizes the Sony for having a compressed raw file and limited bit depth compared with the Nikon. But in my last few months of shooting I have not seen any issues in the images.
I am set to unload my Nikon kit this week and invest in more Sony gear, but before I do I thought I'd get some opinions from the experts here.
Thanks in advance.
I've been loving my A7R which i purchased after a quick test with my Canon TS-E lenses. I had been using a D800E with the Nikon 24 Shift and the Nikon 14-24 for my work up to that point. The Canon lenses and the friendliness of the Sony digital viewfinder, tilting screen are just wonderful for architecture and landscapes. My question is this: everyone criticizes the Sony for having a compressed raw file and limited bit depth compared with the Nikon. But in my last few months of shooting I have not seen any issues in the images.
I am set to unload my Nikon kit this week and invest in more Sony gear, but before I do I thought I'd get some opinions from the experts here.
Thanks in advance.