Site Sponsors
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 51 to 80 of 80

Thread: A7RII + Cambo Actus

  1. #51
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    3,556
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by scho View Post
    Tried doing some stitching with the Leica R 35-70 Vario-Elmar f/4 on the Cambo Actus with Sony A7R-FS (CC filter on lens). Two images below are composed of two shots each stitched with Photomerge in LR.
    Barely enough room to shift inside the relatively small image circle of the 35-70 @ 35 mm. I'm going to try some of my Pentax 645 lenses next, particularly the Pentax 645 A 35/3.5.
    Two more stitched shots using the Pentax 645-A 35mm f/3.5 lens. More room for shifting and no lateral vignetting or color shift.



    Carl
    Gallery
    Likes 5 Member(s) liked this post

  2. #52
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    3,556
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Pentax 645-A 35mm f/3.5, two shots framed using rise/fall and cropped in post. Edges soft as a result of some un-intended aperture adjustment (was set at f/11, but should have been in A position for the Cambo mount manual adjust so actually was wide open)

    Last edited by scho; 10th October 2016 at 13:18.
    Carl
    Gallery
    Likes 4 Member(s) liked this post

  3. #53
    Senior Member Steve Hendrix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    421
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    4

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by daf View Post
    My guess: an Old stock of Sk componon 60/4 apo hm same as digitar 60/4...

    All the componon apo hm 60/80/90/100 play very well At f8/f11...even the 45apo hm allow 5/7mm of shift on 24x36 sensor with digitar crispiness

    I had a very quick, semi-rough sortie with this lens last week (we just received our demo).

    I shot it against a Schneider 60mm/5.6 APO Digitar XL (a great, very sharp lens).

    To my eye, the Actar 60mm did not match it, but it came close enough to impress. Considering the price difference, this lens may prove to be a worthy addition to the Actar line.

    That lens will be shown at PhotoPlus in New York City this week (booth # 358). If you're around, Capture Integration will be at booth # 249, swing by and say hi.


    Steve Hendrix/CI
    Steve Hendrix, Sales Manager, www.captureintegration.com (e-mail Me)
    Digital Cam: Phase One | Leaf | Leica | Sinar Authorized Reseller
    TechCam: Alpa | Cambo | Arca Swiss | Sinar Authorized Reseller

  4. #54
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    234
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    This is likely a silly question. 25% of what I do is stitched panoramas using my A7rII + Nodal Ninja 3 and Loxia 21 or 50mm. Would I be able to use the Actus or Actus mini with my A7rII + Loxia setup? So Sony rear mount and Lens board. Had all on the Canon TSEs adapted to A7rII and never liked it. Love the look of the Actus and really miss movements. Also have the GM 24-70 which I use for my LE work and would love movements on that as well. I shoot mainly at ground level and a little rise and fall or shift is always beneficial.
    David
    Auckland, NZ.

  5. #55
    Member CAMBOUSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    66
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by Hausen View Post
    This is likely a silly question. 25% of what I do is stitched panoramas using my A7rII + Nodal Ninja 3 and Loxia 21 or 50mm. Would I be able to use the Actus or Actus mini with my A7rII + Loxia setup? So Sony rear mount and Lens board. Had all on the Canon TSEs adapted to A7rII and never liked it. Love the look of the Actus and really miss movements. Also have the GM 24-70 which I use for my LE work and would love movements on that as well. I shoot mainly at ground level and a little rise and fall or shift is always beneficial.
    Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but neither of those three lenses will focus unfortunately. They are all designed to be used natively on the Sony system and when you introduce the bellows in between, they will never be able to achieve focus.

    What didn't you like about the TSE lenses?

    Have you considered using a medium format lens with a larger image circle instead, or perhaps the Actar 24?
    Blake Griffin - Channel Manager - Cambo USA
    Cambousa.com Email

  6. #56
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    234
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by CAMBOUSA View Post
    Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but neither of those three lenses will focus unfortunately. They are all designed to be used natively on the Sony system and when you introduce the bellows in between, they will never be able to achieve focus.

    What didn't you like about the TSE lenses?

    Have you considered using a medium format lens with a larger image circle instead, or perhaps the Actar 24?
    Thanks for reply. I thought about it afterward and come to same conclusion The adaptors (Metabones IV) really annoyed me for my long exposure work with light leaks and such. I covered them up but am often in wind and it wasn't great. Native lenses always work better so I got rid of them. Miss the movements though. Will have a look at the Actar 24. Was hoping if I grabbed an Actus Mini it might rid me of my Tech Camera fetish.
    David
    Auckland, NZ.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  7. #57
    Member CAMBOUSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    66
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by Hausen View Post
    Thanks for reply. I thought about it afterward and come to same conclusion The adaptors (Metabones IV) really annoyed me for my long exposure work with light leaks and such. I covered them up but am often in wind and it wasn't great. Native lenses always work better so I got rid of them. Miss the movements though. Will have a look at the Actar 24. Was hoping if I grabbed an Actus Mini it might rid me of my Tech Camera fetish.
    I may be on the other side of the world, but feel free to reach out with any questions!

    I can tell you that the fine folks at Cambo do read this forum sometimes, they just don't speak up as much as I do.
    Blake Griffin - Channel Manager - Cambo USA
    Cambousa.com Email

  8. #58
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    44
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    If anyone from Cambo is reading, I'd be really grateful to know how well the Actus works with the Leica M240 or M246? There is obviously an M mount. Which lenses in the 50mm focal length area work flawlessly at infinity with this set up? For example the 60mm Actar? How much back rise / fall would this give (my interest is architecture) and/or left-right stitching? Anything that I need to consider - like color cast etc? THANK YOU if you can help answer!

  9. #59
    Member CAMBOUSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    66
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Warwick View Post
    If anyone from Cambo is reading, I'd be really grateful to know how well the Actus works with the Leica M240 or M246? There is obviously an M mount. Which lenses in the 50mm focal length area work flawlessly at infinity with this set up? For example the 60mm Actar? How much back rise / fall would this give (my interest is architecture) and/or left-right stitching? Anything that I need to consider - like color cast etc? THANK YOU if you can help answer!
    There are a few ways to look at this. On the traditional Rodenstock and Schneider options, because of the Flange Focal Distance (FFD), you are looking at lenses 70mm and greater having full compatibility. The 55mm Apo Sironar digital lens should focus to infinity, but because of it's design will not give you much (if any) movement.

    M39 enlarger lenses 60 and above should work no problem.

    And of course, the Actar 60 would give you infinity focus and around 15-17mm of shift depending on your orientation.

    As to not clog up the Sony thread with Leica, please feel free to email or PM me any further questions about this setup.
    Last edited by CAMBOUSA; 6th March 2017 at 12:12.
    Blake Griffin - Channel Manager - Cambo USA
    Cambousa.com Email

  10. #60
    Senior Member thrice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,267
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by scho View Post
    Pentax 645-A 35mm f/3.5, two shots framed using rise/fall and cropped in post. Edges soft as a result of some un-intended aperture adjustment (was set at f/11, but should have been in A position for the Cambo mount manual adjust so actually was wide open)
    How do you find corner sharpness at about 15mm shift? I am using the HD version of the lens with 2 kipon adapters (P645-F, F-FE) and it's quite impressive.

  11. #61
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    3,556
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    This is cross posted from the Sony B&W thread. A quick test shot using the Sony A6000M on the Cambo Actus with Cambo Actar 60/4 lens at f/11. This may be a nice setup for doing stitched B&W landscapes. The monochrome sensor in the A6000M gives excellent resolution and dynamic range.

    Carl
    Gallery
    Likes 5 Member(s) liked this post

  12. #62
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    489
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by scho View Post
    Front swing and tilt, rear rise/fall and shift.
    Actually, adding front rise is now possible ... well, sort of.

    At some point (I'm not certain when, but I believe it was in conjunction with the release of the DB version of the Actus), Cambo started machining a second mounting hole/recess into its lens panels, as shown below:



    These two holes are spaced 8mm apart and the Actus normally uses the upper hole, which maximizes the contact area between the lens panel and front standard.

    However, by using the bottom hole, it's possible to achieve a fixed 8mm of front rise, which might prove useful to some photographers, in some situations. The reduction in contact area between the lens panel and standard is presumably not an issue, either, because if it was, Cambo surely would have designed a second lens panel instead of adding a second hole to their existing lens panel ... am I right?

    And if 8mm is too much rise, any competent machinist can add a third hole/recess in between the existing two to achieve a lesser amount of rise or even add a beveled slot between the two existing holes to achieve a variable amount of front rise between 0 and 8mm by using the clamp to hold the lens panel in place at the desired point.

    Mind you, this rise movement won't be geared, so it might prove tricky to add small, precise amounts this way, but view cameras have successfully used non-geared, sliding movements for several generations without too much issue. Cambo must agree with this approach, too, at least in principle, because the Actus' rear shift movement isn't geared and works essentially the same way, except it slides laterally instead of vertically.

    Of course, I can't vouch for how well the clamping screw will hold when used with a slot instead of a recess, but I can confirm that it clamps down quite securely on the lens panel in its original, unmodified form and unless the lens being used is extraordinarily heavy, I'll bet it will hold just fine.

    If it doesn't, then it's not a big deal, because the lens panel will still work just fine with zero front rise applied, so one won't need to replace it and will only be out the cost of having it modified.

    In fact, now that I've mentioned the possibility of adding a slot between the two existing holes out loud, I may just have to try it myself, if only because I can.
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  13. #63
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    3,556
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by Audii-Dudii View Post
    Actually, adding front rise is now possible ... well, sort of.

    At some point (I'm not certain when, but I believe it was in conjunction with the release of the DB version of the Actus), Cambo started machining a second mounting hole/recess into its lens panels, as shown below:



    These two holes are spaced 8mm apart and the Actus normally uses the upper hole, which maximizes the contact area between the lens panel and front standard.

    However, by using the bottom hole, it's possible to achieve a fixed 8mm of front rise, which might prove useful to some photographers, in some situations. The reduction in contact area between the lens panel and standard is presumably not an issue, either, because if it was, Cambo surely would have designed a second lens panel instead of adding a second hole to their existing lens panel ... am I right?

    And if 8mm is too much rise, any competent machinist can add a third hole/recess in between the existing two to achieve a lesser amount of rise or even add a beveled slot between the two existing holes to achieve a variable amount of front rise between 0 and 8mm by using the clamp to hold the lens panel in place at the desired point.

    Mind you, this rise movement won't be geared, so it might prove tricky to add small, precise amounts this way, but view cameras have successfully used non-geared, sliding movements for several generations without too much issue. Cambo must agree with this approach, too, at least in principle, because the Actus' rear shift movement isn't geared and works essentially the same way, except it slides laterally instead of vertically.

    Of course, I can't vouch for how well the clamping screw will hold when used with a slot instead of a recess, but I can confirm that it clamps down quite securely on the lens panel in its original, unmodified form and unless the lens being used is extraordinarily heavy, I'll bet it will hold just fine.

    If it doesn't, then it's not a big deal, because the lens panel will still work just fine with zero front rise applied, so one won't need to replace it and will only be out the cost of having it modified.

    In fact, now that I've mentioned the possibility of adding a slot between the two existing holes out loud, I may just have to try it myself, if only because I can.
    None of my lens plates have the double hole, but except for the Pentax 645 plate all were purchased a few years ago. Rear rise/fall is adequate for my needs, but I don't do much architectural photography.
    Carl
    Gallery

  14. #64
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    3,556
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by scho View Post
    This is cross posted from the Sony B&W thread. A quick test shot using the Sony A6000M on the Cambo Actus with Cambo Actar 60/4 lens at f/11. This may be a nice setup for doing stitched B&W landscapes. The monochrome sensor in the A6000M gives excellent resolution and dynamic range.

    A four shot stitch from the same setup as above. Click for full size original.

    Carl
    Gallery
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  15. #65
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    489
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by scho View Post
    None of my lens plates have the double hole, but except for the Pentax 645 plate all were purchased a few years ago. Rear rise/fall is adequate for my needs, but I don't do much architectural photography.
    If you have older lens panels, adding a second hole isn't a huge task. Not sure what to say about the Pentax plate, except maybe it wasn't recent production?

    Or maybe I was told wrong and the second holes haven't been added to the lens plates universally? (I only have this one, but I've seen photos of other lens plates with two holes.)

    But I do agree with you that the existing amount of rear rise / fall is adequate for me, especially because I use lenses with limited image circles and photograph primarily architecture, where rear movements are generally preferred over front movements.

    But it's nice to know that if I ever do run out of rear fall movement, I can easily add another 8mm indirectly by raising the front standard.

  16. #66
    Member CAMBOUSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    66
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    If I remember correctly the double hole is a more recent addition to the Actus lens boards.

    It was added specifically on boards designed for use with the Actus DB (Copal 0, Copal 1, ACB-ALP Alpa, ACB-WRS WRS).

    I just did a spot check on some boards that I have here and the Alpa board and a Copal 1 board both have the second hole. But from the same "batch" I have a Pentax 645 and Mamiya 645 board that both do not have the second hole.

    In an official capacity I can't comment about the addition of a second hole to boards without, but I would be willing to say if you do try it please be careful as it would void any warranties on said boards.
    Blake Griffin - Channel Manager - Cambo USA
    Cambousa.com Email

  17. #67
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    220
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    My copal boards have 2 holes and I have had them for quite a while (2 years?)
    never trust the opinion of anyone who lists a load of gear in their forum signature. Dealers do not email me asking to buy your products.

  18. #68
    Subscriber & Workshop Member GrahamWelland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    5,832
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    566

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by MrSmith View Post
    My copal boards have 2 holes and I have had them for quite a while (2 years?)
    Me too. All of my Copal lens boards have the double holes and I've had the Actus DB/DB+ and Sony versions from when they first came out.
    Remember: adventure before dementia!

    As Oscar Wilde said, "my tastes are simple, I only like the best"
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  19. #69
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    3,556
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    A few shots taken at the arboretum ponds using the A6000M+Cambo Actus+Cambo Actar 4/60 lens +B+W 040 orange filter. The images are 2-3 shots each stitched with Photomerge function in LR.





    Carl
    Gallery
    Likes 4 Member(s) liked this post

  20. #70
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    3,556
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by Audii-Dudii View Post
    Actually, adding front rise is now possible ... well, sort of.

    At some point (I'm not certain when, but I believe it was in conjunction with the release of the DB version of the Actus), Cambo started machining a second mounting hole/recess into its lens panels, as shown below:

    These two holes are spaced 8mm apart and the Actus normally uses the upper hole, which maximizes the contact area between the lens panel and front standard.

    However, by using the bottom hole, it's possible to achieve a fixed 8mm of front rise, which might prove useful to some photographers, in some situations. The reduction in contact area between the lens panel and standard is presumably not an issue, either, because if it was, Cambo surely would have designed a second lens panel instead of adding a second hole to their existing lens panel ... am I right?

    And if 8mm is too much rise, any competent machinist can add a third hole/recess in between the existing two to achieve a lesser amount of rise or even add a beveled slot between the two existing holes to achieve a variable amount of front rise between 0 and 8mm by using the clamp to hold the lens panel in place at the desired point.

    Mind you, this rise movement won't be geared, so it might prove tricky to add small, precise amounts this way, but view cameras have successfully used non-geared, sliding movements for several generations without too much issue. Cambo must agree with this approach, too, at least in principle, because the Actus' rear shift movement isn't geared and works essentially the same way, except it slides laterally instead of vertically.

    Of course, I can't vouch for how well the clamping screw will hold when used with a slot instead of a recess, but I can confirm that it clamps down quite securely on the lens panel in its original, unmodified form and unless the lens being used is extraordinarily heavy, I'll bet it will hold just fine.

    If it doesn't, then it's not a big deal, because the lens panel will still work just fine with zero front rise applied, so one won't need to replace it and will only be out the cost of having it modified.

    In fact, now that I've mentioned the possibility of adding a slot between the two existing holes out loud, I may just have to try it myself, if only because I can.
    No second hole on these copal plates:
    Carl
    Gallery
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  21. #71
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    489
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by scho View Post
    No second hole on these copal plates:
    I believe it's now been clearly established by an official source that the second holes appear only on those lens panels (plates? boards?) that are also intended to be used with the Actus DB (and GFX?) versions.

    Yours, by your own admission, appear to predate the introduction of the DB version hence have only the one hole.

    Presumably, this is because only a fool like me would ever think of turning the second hole into a quasi front rise movement!

    Or for that matter, using the original Actus as a tilt-shift adapter with a variety of 35mm-format lenses and a camera body with a 35mm-format sensor...
    Last edited by Audii-Dudii; 22nd August 2017 at 12:02.

  22. #72
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    220
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    I believe it's now been clearly established by an official source that the second holes appear only on those lens panels (plates? boards?) that are also intended to be used with the Actus DB (and GFX?) versions.

    Yours, by your own admission, appear to predate the introduction of the DB version hence have only the one hole.
    except 2 people have posted to the contrary, me and Graham both have double holes on copal boards, my actus was purchased very early on soon after release, there was no DB version available then, no W/A sony rear standard available either. things might be different with current inventory.
    never trust the opinion of anyone who lists a load of gear in their forum signature. Dealers do not email me asking to buy your products.

  23. #73
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    3,556
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by MrSmith View Post
    except 2 people have posted to the contrary, me and Graham both have double holes on copal boards, my actus was purchased very early on soon after release, there was no DB version available then, no W/A sony rear standard available either. things might be different with current inventory.
    Same here. I purchased the original Actus right after release in 2014 with 2 Copal 0 plates and two more plates in 2015 - all with no second hole (?).
    Carl
    Gallery

  24. #74
    Workshop Member Woody Campbell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,120
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    66

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    do the Rodenstock retro focus wides (such as the Digaron-s 23) reach infinity focus?

  25. #75
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    489
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by Woody Campbell View Post
    do the Rodenstock retro focus wides (such as the Digaron-s 23) reach infinity focus?
    No ... the rear element of the lens is too large.

    Specifically, its diameter is too wide and it projects too far rearward for the plain-jane Actus Mini to accommodate it, even when the camera is used with its optional, non-rotating rear standard.

    This article explains the reasons why this is so.

    I believe the DB2 might accommodate it, but it will require the use of a digital back instead of a mirrorless camera body (or possibly a custom mount for a mirrorless camera body? I haven't seen a DB2 in person yet, so can't say for certain how realistic an option this may or may not be.)

  26. #76
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    3,556
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    A few stitched images taken at Sixmile Creek in Ithaca, NY. Setup was Sony A7r-FS with Astronomic OWB clip filter on sensor, Cambo Actus, Pentax-A 645 3.5/35mm lens on tripod. Used a Vello remote release with radio receiver on camera.





    Carl
    Gallery
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  27. #77
    Workshop Member Woody Campbell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,120
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    66

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by Audii-Dudii View Post
    No ... the rear element of the lens is too large.

    Specifically, its diameter is too wide and it projects too far rearward for the plain-jane Actus Mini to accommodate it, even when the camera is used with its optional, non-rotating rear standard.

    This article explains the reasons why this is so.

    I believe the DB2 might accommodate it, but it will require the use of a digital back instead of a mirrorless camera body (or possibly a custom mount for a mirrorless camera body? I haven't seen a DB2 in person yet, so can't say for certain how realistic an option this may or may not be.)
    Very good article - thanks.

  28. #78
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    46
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    I wondered about using my Cambo Schneider lenses with an Actus but was told that they wouldn't focus to infinity. Do you have any trouble?




    Quote Originally Posted by scho View Post
    Tried doing some stitching with the Leica R 35-70 Vario-Elmar f/4 on the Cambo Actus with Sony A7R-FS (CC filter on lens). Two images below are composed of two shots each stitched with Photomerge in LR.





    Barely enough room to shift inside the relatively small image circle of the 35-70 @ 35 mm. I'm going to try some of my Pentax 645 lenses next, particularly the Pentax 645 A 35/3.5.

  29. #79
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    3,556
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by AndyPtak View Post
    I wondered about using my Cambo Schneider lenses with an Actus but was told that they wouldn't focus to infinity. Do you have any trouble?
    I only use LF lenses with focal lengths greater than 40mm, so no problems reaching infinity focus.
    Carl
    Gallery

  30. #80
    New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    1
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A7RII + Cambo Actus

    Quote Originally Posted by CAMBOUSA View Post
    There are a few ways to look at this. On the traditional Rodenstock and Schneider options, because of the Flange Focal Distance (FFD), you are looking at lenses 70mm and greater having full compatibility. The 55mm Apo Sironar digital lens should focus to infinity, but because of it's design will not give you much (if any) movement.

    M39 enlarger lenses 60 and above should work no problem.

    And of course, the Actar 60 would give you infinity focus and around 15-17mm of shift depending on your orientation.

    As to not clog up the Sony thread with Leica, please feel free to email or PM me any further questions about this setup.
    Hi,

    This is my first post though I have lurked in the background and purchased in the group. But after reading your post regarding the Rodenstock 55mm f4.5 Apo Sironar Digital lens, I thought that your comments were incorrect due to my experience. So, I went back and tried my lens on my Actus with one of my A7r cameras. I tested only visually without taking an image, the lens focused to about infinity (homes behind my house hundreds of feet away though the foreground was much closer. Unless I am in error, and focused at what would be close to infinity I did not find any restriction both in landscape and portrait mode using the full 27mm of rise/fall (though I forgot to remove the L bracket that caused interference in the last 5mm of fall in the portait mode) and the full 40mm of shift (20mm L and 20mm R) limited only by camera design without restrictions of rise and fall with the Actus Mini camera. I did not check to see if 3 rows of 3 images could be taken without a hitch, but I would suspect so.

    I then went back and also tested only visually without taking an image my Rodenstock 50mm f2.8 Apo Rodagon N Enlarger lens mounted on a special adapter that allowed the lens to be mounted on my Cambo modified Leica R Cambo Actus lens board (Cambo modified the board lens release so that I could mount and remove my Leica/SK 28mm f2.8 Super Angulon PC lens). My visual tests suggest that the lens can be used with about 8mm of left and right shift in the landscape mode and about 9 mm of shift in the portrait mode when focused close to infinity.

    Rich

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •