PeterA
Well-known member
My shooting process is based on profiled and calibrated workflow for every camera and back I own through to Eizo/Nec monitors and Epson printers. I more interested in what I see on my monitors being as close as possible to what I print - than caring about the in camera LCD picture irrespective of back/camera/optical/evf or whatever .. The in camera LCD and the monitors view of the world is only relevant to me to the extent it helps me make a print that reflects what I wish to print- now if the jpeg rendition on the back of a tiny LCD could match my printer /paper choices much closer than currently able- I am all ears and eyes - because my workflow would be simplified - and the painful and regular calibration process - as well as paper and printer profiling process could be simplified as well.Let me see if I can rephrase to unconfuse..
An in Camera EVF is just a tiny LCD (usually OLED LCD) screen made the same way as your Computer LCD monitor, which is also an LCD (often an LED LCD). So if you are viewing the taking image with an in Camera EVF its essentially close to what you will see on your Desktop LCD Monitor. Its WYSIWYG - Moreso than an OVF.
SLRs came out in the 1950s providing TTL - "through the lens" viewing. An improvement for some rangefinder users.
Digital Mirrorless have improved on SLRs/DSLRs by providing TTLS - "through the lens & sensor" viewing.
Lens selection aside, one remaining advantage of a modern DSLR is focus speed.
The EVF has advantages of no black out and no vibration.
Can manufacturers improve on current EVF LCDs? A: Yes
Will they? A: Yes
In the end use what you want. I don't care.
Yeah I will shoot with what I wish to - as will every one else - but I do care what and why other people choose to use - because I am an inquisitive chap by nature - hence my rare question about other's preferences- when someone says something interesting or unexpected I like to be educated.
-Cheers Pete