Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
So it would seem - what's tragic about it is that many people will already have cancelled their orders based on these results (not so much here as at dPreview itself - I've had emails!). Incidentally - its the same at other ISO values as well - clearly they focus once and then snap away.Jono,
What this tells me is that the people at dpr aren't able to focus properly. The test photos for the A77 are apparently focused further back.
Well, I never was very convinced by the relevance of DxO in the real world. As for me? I'm conditionally impressed with the IQ from the A77 - but I won't really be able to make up my mind until Aperture support the RAW conversions.Still, I don't understand the DxO rating, since the A77 and DH2 are very close within "normal" ISO values according to their own curves. I can't see that in any other way that they are putting equal emphasis on all ISO values, although most photography is done between 100 and 800.
Well, you might be right, the D3s seems to suffer quite a lot as well though. Of course, there could be some lens curvature issues here as well.What surprises me is that there test scene doesn't seem so deep that f9 wouldn't keep more stuff seemingly sharp. I wonder how close they get to that scene to take the shot. This isn't the first time the "point of focus" has come up with that scene especially with full frame cameras. I'm thinking that similar to the IQ180 once you start getting into very high pixel densities, your focus point (when pixel peeping) gets more and more important.
Yes - it's compulsory - as a penance :ROTFL:So does this mean that I have to buy a NEX 7 as well then?