Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
You have not seen the sketches of the leaked Hasselblad A77, yet I think. It is not exactly a DSLR but rather Sony's SLT.No, that's it.
The Lunar is:
- compact
- a dslr : do not start splitting hairs there is no mirror, because it is
- mirrorless
That is why Hasselblad is so genious and why it is like
"The lunar has Decadence - the kind of french Riviera and full body massage decadence......"
:ROTFL:
I believe it is the 24 meg FF A99 SLT they are going to pimp out. I guess that is still a DSLR as in Digital Single Lens Reflex no matter what is going on inside the camera ... maybe "reflex" is incorrect since the mirror never "reflexes" ... however, the Pellix mirror Canons were still referred to as SLRs. :ROTFL:You have not seen the sketches of the leaked Hasselblad A77, yet I think. It is not exactly a DSLR but rather Sony's SLT.
Why is that a Sony issue to take blame for? The older flash mount was inherited from Minolta, and they should have changed it long ago (even though it is super easy to use). It is Hasselblad that decided on using the Sony Nex-7 so it all their fault IMO.Why should sony.. well, the lens mount is still SOny E and the flash mount is still the old (now abandoned) Sony flash mount.
If Hasselblad has promised to buy a certain number we may at some point see some rebates .-)(...) Some company comes along and says it'll buy certain numbers of a camera (...)
Well, I quite agree (nobody got all that bread by being thick in the head).However, the Luxury positioning is the most delusional aspect of the whole debacle because it targets the wealthy and incredibly stupid ... a combination I personally have not run across very often. The rich may be many things, but stupid is rarely one of them.
Actually this video was not Hasselblad official, it was from a Hasselblad dealer Fotocare.comAnything is possible now.
Think of this decadence slogan. Is there any serious management in this world who would let this embarassing, foolish nonsense pass and get public?
Serious only, when they have a hidden agenda to knock Hasselblad down.
I've also heard "... and two to take him!" appended to that statement.At last, P. T. Barnum is proven right.
- Leigh
(For those unfamiliar: P. T. Barnum is credited with saying "There's a sucker born every minute.")
I've never seen a used H4X for sale. There probably aren't that many around, and with the price of a new one (4-5,000 Euro plus the value of your old H1/2) it won't be an easy sell, even if it's the Hasselblad that makes the most sense right now (except specialty cameras like the 200ms).Jorgen
It would be really interesting to know how much a used H4x will sell for.
If your theory is right (and I think it is) the price should be significantly higher than a normal H4.
And if this is the case it would take only a small decision by Hasselblad to significantly change the value of their stock - just do a H5x.
Interesting !
Stefan