Guy Mancuso
Administrator, Instructor
The 17 is outstanding. Just got home and will post some shots within the next days. But honestly this maybe the best reason to own a Sony A7r is the ability to use these 2 lenses. Not too mention the 90TSE
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Yeah!The 17 is outstanding. Just got home and will post some shots within the next days. But honestly this maybe the best reason to own a Sony A7r is the ability to use these 2 lenses. Not too mention the 90TSE
John,for my cambo rig i use the Lee wide angle compendium bellows with a variety of adapters to fit my lenses. polarizer is 105mm B+W and i use Schneider 4mm thick 4" sq glass filters, 4 x 5.6" GND); will figure a way to fit that to the 24mm lens next (looks like an 82mm wide angle Lee adapter would work, but this setup is too small for the 17mm
Basically you get more top and bottom in the frame but the width seems to be the Same as shooting a horizontal . Have not tried it in the 24 config but my bet is the same way. Let me give this another try though as I only did 1 stitch shot so far. Stitching the 17 might just be a rare thing to do in the real world. Most likely it would be a interior shot that would work best.Guy,
What are the aspects you get from a full shift to the left and right (not rise or fall) on the 17 and 24? Are you getting a panoramic looking file or just a little wider respectively?
Thanks,
Mark
I have the Lee ring adapter for the 17mm. It does restrict you to 5mm on either side for movements. Tilts okayJohn,
I assume that you've seen that LEE have a dedicated ring for the 17TSE? Check out B&H as they list it.