Evanjoe610
New member
Tim,
I suggested the Rolleiflex 3.5T model as a good and more modern way to approach a Rolleiflex. The 2.8s and anything from 3.5E2,E3 and F would cost you an arm and a leg. I guess that not being in the market for another Rolleiflex, I would not be the best person regarding prices. I checked eBay and see that the prices are a bt high and not so many TLRs as previously.
Another choice for an inexpensive way into the Rolleiflex TLR world is an MX.
The Rolleiflex MX is a similar camera as the Rolleiflex T, just made earlier.
It would have the same similar characteristics as the T's optic which is a Tessar 3.5.
I'm not sure what your budget is, but did you check Koh's Camera & LeCamera? Just not sure if it is guarantee NOT to require a CLA. You could always ask...
http://www.lecameraonline.com/category_s/30.htm
If I come across any leads, I will PM you if that is the best way.
Evan
I suggested the Rolleiflex 3.5T model as a good and more modern way to approach a Rolleiflex. The 2.8s and anything from 3.5E2,E3 and F would cost you an arm and a leg. I guess that not being in the market for another Rolleiflex, I would not be the best person regarding prices. I checked eBay and see that the prices are a bt high and not so many TLRs as previously.
Another choice for an inexpensive way into the Rolleiflex TLR world is an MX.
The Rolleiflex MX is a similar camera as the Rolleiflex T, just made earlier.
It would have the same similar characteristics as the T's optic which is a Tessar 3.5.
I'm not sure what your budget is, but did you check Koh's Camera & LeCamera? Just not sure if it is guarantee NOT to require a CLA. You could always ask...
http://www.lecameraonline.com/category_s/30.htm
If I come across any leads, I will PM you if that is the best way.
Evan