Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
LOL, I'm still chuckling on that "true" statement.Viablex1: Another interesting ruin. These days, I would have thought the asylum would be full!
Wow, I only thought this was done in the US. Interesting view regardless.
Thanks Steve, btw. it is not true that the "Junk" house picture was taken with the cheap little 18-70 kit lens, it was taken with the Zeiss ZF 1.4/85 Planar.Steen, the IQ & Color are Superb on the "Junk" house! (...)
Nope. Waiting to hear about the newest version of same, scheduled for "Spring 2010". Thanks for asking though (as if my own impatience wasn't enough! )TR...Did you pull the trigger on the Zeiss 100 yet?
The ZF 85 1.4 is Insanely Sharp! BTW...Love this shot!!Thanks Steve, btw. it is not true that the "Junk" house picture was taken with the cheap little 18-70 kit lens, it was taken with the Zeiss ZF 1.4/85 Planar.
But I can no longer make any corrections to that post. I apologize for any confusion caused.
It is even not the first time I make this error, too much copy and paste ...
Nikon D300 • Nikkor AF-S 18-70mm • 1/20 sec. at f/8 ISO 200 • Capture NX
Thanks, Steen and Lloyd. Unfortunately, the job wasn't all perfect. The lower right strobe was a little too "hot", so the ottoman is slightly overexposed, but I believe they'll fix that during post-processing.Obviously you did a perfect job, Jorgen, despite the lack of a meter by hand.
Looks great and ready for the brochure. I want one immediately
Is it a "Stressless" ?
Whew... you had me scouring ads for an 18-70 for a second there!! :ROTFL:Thanks Steve, btw. it is not true that the "Junk" house picture was taken with the cheap little 18-70 kit lens, it was taken with the Zeiss ZF 1.4/85 Planar.
But I can no longer make any corrections to that post. I apologize for any confusion caused.
It is even not the first time I make this error, too much copy and paste ...
Good one :thumbup:Drive By....
That's OK. I don't own that many strobes. Awesome and challenging work!But my living-room is rather tidy
D80 with 80-200 AF-S @ 80mm and f/9.0
Actually, it's a studio shot from this morning. I was picked up at 6 P.M. with all my gear, including 6 strobes with stands, to a factory way out in the middle of nowhere, to take photos of 2 – two – recliner chairs. One of them had to be white, isolated on white, straight from the camera. And I don't even own a meter
2.5M white ceiling? 3 strobes bounced off at congruent angles and 2 strobe softbox or through umbrellas to soften and eliminate shadows?Thanks, Jason. Usually when I work for those people, we do five pieces of furniture per hour for two days non-stop, each piece in around 10 different positions. That's a bit more stressful, particularly since some of the furniture is literally arriving unassembled from the production line and assembled on the studio floor. The limited time is also the reason for the number of strobes; because of this, I need to cover every angle by rotating the chair or sofa, mostly without moving any of the strobes. Adding to the challenge is a ceiling height of less than 250cm (around 8 feet), and yes, the ceiling is white.
This is all a result of lots of experimenting. Until three years ago, I hardly knew what a studio strobe looked like, but I participated in a local workshop and adapted what I learned to real life. During the process, I've learned that unlimited amounts of tape and cardboard in assorted shades of gray, black and white is at least as important as how fancy the lighting equipment is.
I agree I need to get to work!!!Steen, the IQ & Color are Superb on the "Junk" house!
Viablex....This would be a cool place for some eclectic model shooting...
TR...Did you pull the trigger on the Zeiss 100 yet?
Very moody, Jason. Nice!Drive By....
Edit: If you look at the central leg of the ottoman, you can actually see that the lower left strobe is placed lower than the one to the right. The right one is partly shaded by the pillow. This is deliberate and one of the challenges; the furniture should be very evenly lit but still with small variations to avoid making it look flat and lifeless. There are lots of considerations regarding shadows and reflections, how strong and where.Terrific job you did there Jorgen, really.
And great insight, with a particularly bounding location.
A couple of questions though, if you don't mind.
I guess this time you shot Manual mode, what was the actual speed? SOmething like 1/160th or 1/200th?
Manual mode and 1/60th. A faster shutter speed would have been better, since I would pick up less ambient light, but I've found the right WB for this speed with the current setup, so I'm leaving it at that for the moment.
Was it a trial and error not having a meter?
Yes, it was a trial and error, but I've been taking product shots there for 5-10 days every year for the last 4 years, so I don't start from scratch every time. I started with 2 strobes though, then went to 5 and now 6 plus a backup.
Last, how do you synchronize (chords, PW, auto detection with pop flash...)?
I use IR, but I'll change to PW or something similar later this year. IR isn't 100% reliable.
If the posted image is pretty much on echot "out of camera", what i find the most
impressive is the HL reflections in the metal legs (while keeping details and good exposure allowing details on the white leather).
I always bracket 3 shots (different apertures) in 1/3 steps, 4 shots with black leather. Black leather is the most difficult, since details often disappears if it's only slightly underexposed, so I have an extra overexposed shot, just in case.
Great skills are required to achieve that kind of details, exposure and structured lighting especially in not-so-controlled conditions and a relatively reasonnable level of equipment. :thumbs:
(though i also see there another proof that this 80-200mm is a treat)
The 80-200 is a bit long on DX for this, and I'm mostly at 80mm. I'm considering a Tokina 50-135. An alternative would be to upgrade to FX, obviously, but the cost would be higher. I can almost get a D300s plus the Tokina for the price of the D700. I do think the 80-200 AF-S is one of the best lenses Nikon has ever made. I wouldn't be surprised if that was the lens they looked at when updating the 70-200.