Extensive preview at the spanish website quesabesde http://www.quesabesde.com/noticias/fuji-x100-muestras-analisis,1_7322
Raw samples are provided too.
Raw samples are provided too.
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
I like this photo alot. I think 3200 will be my max for most stuff.Funny how the bar has moved and our noise and high ISO standards have changed. The strawberry shots:
http://images.quesabesde.com/camaras_digitales/noticias/fuji_x100_dscf0292.jpg
at ISO 3200 look like ISO 400 on my D50 and Pany L1.
Is it March yet?
Either that or rather a heavy AA filter - it'll be interesting to see.I think your post processing shows that the default settings for the jpg rendering has very little sharpening and low contrast (on preproduction cameras anyway), much like an "undeveloped" raw.
.
Hi thereI didn't apply much sharpening and i did apply some noise reduction. The big change was + .75 exposure (it is under exposed). I also added a small amount of curve to bring up contrast a little.
Thanks John. That seems like a reasonable explanation. I couldn't imagine why they would want to shoot everything with flash. The 6400 shots are quite impressive.I believe from other posts I have read that the flash was not on and it is just an error in the EXIF data due to pre beta software. Every single picture showed flash on, even those taken in bright daylight.