ddanois
Member
I don't consider "live video" a small "hard to implement" issue. How does a company, with the global reputation of Hasselblad, allow product sheets to be distributed that discuss the live video feature if it has proven so difficult to implement? Like me, many Hasselblad H3D owners need to use the live video function to manage critical focusing us close. While I appreciate the overall quality of what the H3DII-50 delivers to me, I'm frustrated that Hasselblad has not acknowledged formally, that this valuable feature has not be delivered.
Don't get me wrong, I LOVE the quality of what the H3DII-50 provides but don't appreciate the attitude from Hasselblad that I should not mind that a listed feature was not delivered. To be honest, I was considering the H3DII-39 but choose the 50mp version because it appeared to offer the same features but with the opportunity to print larger without "uprezing".
This leads to my question regarding the new 60mp version. What are we going to miss? More importantly, what will we gain for an additional $8-10k?
Is this to bold a question?
Don't get me wrong, I LOVE the quality of what the H3DII-50 provides but don't appreciate the attitude from Hasselblad that I should not mind that a listed feature was not delivered. To be honest, I was considering the H3DII-39 but choose the 50mp version because it appeared to offer the same features but with the opportunity to print larger without "uprezing".
This leads to my question regarding the new 60mp version. What are we going to miss? More importantly, what will we gain for an additional $8-10k?
Is this to bold a question?