Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Woody i finally ran out of updates on my Pro version and i am not happy about it either.:cussing::cussing:guy
Phase just released 3.7.8 which processes both D300 and D3 files. I still like the program better than C4
Woody
Well there is something to be said about the old farts. They been around a long time and have it pretty wired when it comes to color and profiles. It certainly is cleaner David. That yellow cast is goneAnd people wonder why I keep going back to C1 for all my files... :thumbup:
Fast workflow without having to import, great image quality, and most accurate colors with a variety of different cameras. Need I say more?
David
Guy, good work and great read.Bingo less yellow. Look at the left wall . Red type is better in C1 more red than yellow and look at far right red building.
CErtainly not hype.given all the testing, are you seeing anything between these camera systems that would support the hype about the signature leica look, pop, 3-D effect, glow, space around the subject, etc.:
David really may have something with this thought.And people wonder why I keep going back to C1 for all my files... :thumbup:
Fast workflow without having to import, great image quality, and most accurate colors with a variety of different cameras. Need I say more?
David
Victorwoody
nice comparison. Look at the vertical vent; to me the C1 Pro retains the misro contrast that Jack submits (and I am beginning to think he is right) of the leica lenses. The C4 and LR do not. They look flatter, and the PRO C1 just has a touch better micro contrast thus gets that dreaded'3-D' effect
Color difference are likely understandable and correctable once you understand how each uses the profiles.
Victor
PS: I plan to FINALLY unpack the 105 tomorrow. I have a tree and my 800mm set up for birds, and actually, it is TOO much.
The zoom will allow me to use the tripod and catch from titmice to crows from the same postion, though I assume the 105 end is crisper (according to Robert Stevens anyway.
Victor
Woody Could you elaborate on your workflow. This was covered before but I came away without a conclusion. I am assuming you do the Raw conversion first in C1 and then import "what" into Lightroom. The issue I am trying to work thru is the need to edit and select before spending any real time on the image.Victor
I'll be anxious †o see some of your results from the 105-280. This was originally David Farkas' personal lens and it is a really good sample (maybe they all are for all I know.)
I am very keen for Phase one to bring out the new capture one pro software. I love the old 3.7.8 but it is now hard to do without recovery, fill, highlight control etc. Capture 4.1 has those controls but the color is not quite as good as 3.7.8 (but close).
I think I am going back to my old workflow which is to catalog using Lightroom and process in C1. Haven't found anything better.
woody
Hey RogerWoody Could you elaborate on your workflow. This was covered before but I came away without a conclusion. I am assuming you do the Raw conversion first in C1 and then import "what" into Lightroom. The issue I am trying to work thru is the need to edit and select before spending any real time on the image.