sorry for my "strange" questions but since moving from film and seeing how the digital age makes it easier to produce "strong" images i know this might sound strange and i know i am late to the party but has the digital capture and digital post processing and digital viewing of images devalued photographs in general?
it just seems that to produce, share, edit, view, and store images has become so convenient that the value of photographs in general has gone down. i know technology does not make a photographer and i shoot because i enjoy it, but i think digital has made it easier to produce stronger and stronger images.
has the digital age raised the bar in what is a great photo?
is there any validity to these statements?
it just seems that to produce, share, edit, view, and store images has become so convenient that the value of photographs in general has gone down. i know technology does not make a photographer and i shoot because i enjoy it, but i think digital has made it easier to produce stronger and stronger images.
has the digital age raised the bar in what is a great photo?
is there any validity to these statements?