Duff photographer
Active member
Howdo,
In the absence of a Voigtländer forum...
Voigtländer have always been on my radar, but were invariably set aside for the Zeiss ZF, etc. for my Nikon.
However, the recent arrival of the APO-Lanthars in 35mm and 50mm, both f2 aspherical, have got me interested again. Sadly, they're only available in Sony E (E) and Leica M (VM) mount, but both can be adapted for the Z mount (not the F mount obviously). Voigtländer produce an adapter for both mounts to be used on Z cameras*.
One thing I was curious about though. When looking at the MTF's, which appear to be real life measurements, not hypothetical (Cosina produce most of the Zeiss lenses, so presumably they have Zeiss testing gear), there is a difference between the VF mount and the E mount. Presumably this is because of the different sensor/filter set-up in these cameras (although it would depend on which model of camera they tested which confuses things a little) or could it be due to a slight fiddling of the lens design to make the most of the respective manufacturer's sensor/filter set-up. I've lifted the MTF's and attached them below for direct comparison. Any thoughts?
Cheers,
Duff.
*Update/correction: While announced by Voigtländer in 2019, it appears that the Sony E to Nikon Z adapter was never released.
In the absence of a Voigtländer forum...
Voigtländer have always been on my radar, but were invariably set aside for the Zeiss ZF, etc. for my Nikon.
However, the recent arrival of the APO-Lanthars in 35mm and 50mm, both f2 aspherical, have got me interested again. Sadly, they're only available in Sony E (E) and Leica M (VM) mount, but both can be adapted for the Z mount (not the F mount obviously). Voigtländer produce an adapter for both mounts to be used on Z cameras*.
One thing I was curious about though. When looking at the MTF's, which appear to be real life measurements, not hypothetical (Cosina produce most of the Zeiss lenses, so presumably they have Zeiss testing gear), there is a difference between the VF mount and the E mount. Presumably this is because of the different sensor/filter set-up in these cameras (although it would depend on which model of camera they tested which confuses things a little) or could it be due to a slight fiddling of the lens design to make the most of the respective manufacturer's sensor/filter set-up. I've lifted the MTF's and attached them below for direct comparison. Any thoughts?
Cheers,
Duff.
*Update/correction: While announced by Voigtländer in 2019, it appears that the Sony E to Nikon Z adapter was never released.
Last edited: