biglouis
Well-known member
I've been thinking about this a lot recently, mainly because I have agreed to photograph a friends wedding - which is already making me anxious!
There are some wonderfully exotic lenses for m4/3rds cameras, e.g. the Lumix 20/1.7 and the Pana-Leica 45/2.8 Macro. Lenses like the 45-200 and the 7-4 mimic their equivalent counterparts from Nikon and Canon.
But what appears to be missing, to me is the wedding/event photographer's staple aperture/focal length which is the 70-200/2.8 fov lens.
The 35-100 constant 2.8 aperture m4/3ds equivalent would be an excellent addition to the range of lenses and I am surprised neither Panasonic or Olympus make one. The whole beauty of the m4/3rds system is portability without compromising quality so why not a 35-100/2.8 to round out the offering?
LouisB
There are some wonderfully exotic lenses for m4/3rds cameras, e.g. the Lumix 20/1.7 and the Pana-Leica 45/2.8 Macro. Lenses like the 45-200 and the 7-4 mimic their equivalent counterparts from Nikon and Canon.
But what appears to be missing, to me is the wedding/event photographer's staple aperture/focal length which is the 70-200/2.8 fov lens.
The 35-100 constant 2.8 aperture m4/3ds equivalent would be an excellent addition to the range of lenses and I am surprised neither Panasonic or Olympus make one. The whole beauty of the m4/3rds system is portability without compromising quality so why not a 35-100/2.8 to round out the offering?
LouisB