Don't be too tough on Lloyd. He and his kind are seeing the seismic shift in the high end of 35mm photography ad they don't like it one little bit, so it's essentially just a paradigm shift with winners and losers, early (smart) adopters and late (laggard) adopters. He is also not averse to walking both sides of the barbed wire fence, to gain the appearance of impartiality - so you see some muted criticisms of C/N. Nothing on the scale of their user base however!
The smart people got on board with FE early because they are very savvy about lenses and associated processes (profiles, corner fix, etc.) then they developed some level of respect for Sony as the enabler of small, light cameras which allowed them to use the best optics in the business. There is also nothing mediocre about Sony's EVF system, nor its sensors.
Lloyd's business model involves chasing headlines - if it ruffles feathers while doing so, he can count that as great success - publicity is priceless. Yes, it's unjustified and rather puerile, but the man's got to make a living. Speaking of which, has anyone done a back of the envelope calculation multiplying LC's annual subscription fee by various plucked from the air numbers? You know, round figures like 1,000, 3,000, perhaps 5,000. ;-)