MGrayson
Subscriber and Workshop Member
Canon 1D 11.3Pixel Pitch: Micron
A7r 4.9
A7II 5.97
A7s 8.4
Bob
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Canon 1D 11.3Pixel Pitch: Micron
A7r 4.9
A7II 5.97
A7s 8.4
Bob
Yeah, but the weight/pixel pitch is way moreCanon 1D 11.3
"A certain magic" is a good expression and as scientific as I would go with this question. Some cameras/sensors, most of them "fat pixel" ones, have a certain "shine" or "look" that make the photos seem kind of magic. The A7s is certainly one of those, and for one who doesn't print larger than A2 and can live with the ergonomics, that's the camera to go for if you ask me.I quite agree David
a certain magic. rather reminiscent of the lovely files from the A900 at low ISO . Whether it translates to print is a different issue.
I've always felt that this loveliness is to do with not stressing the colour to deal with high ISO (of course that's eisier with a lower pixel density).
I know my question was :OT:, but I found the answer: It's already there!What is Phase One's track record with updating their lens profiles?
Now that Capture One 8.1 processes the A7 II files, I've been using it as the first stop in processing. While C1v8.1 has many Sony lens profiles, there are very few FE and none of the f/4 zooms. LR5.7.1 *does* have profiles for those lenses, but I'd rather stay in C1. Any guesses on lens profile releases?
I was more than a little slow last night… but this explains why the A7s reminds me of the Epson R-D1 -- which has 7.85 µmPixel Pitch: Micron
A7r 4.9
A7II 5.97
A7s 8.4
Bob
I believe you are right.I read on LuLa that the C1 Manufacturer's Profile incorporated lens correction data contained in the RAW, and now I believe it.