Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Florin, caused by your Thanks, some more words:
This forum is the place to find pics from some excellent fotographers, so dont be frustrated if you compare to your work but try to see what makes their pics that good.
Beside composition its all about light, as basic rule: you cannot force a good picture (outside the studio ), you have to be patient and wait for the right light for the place you want to shoot. I am sure here are outstanding landscape pics where the shooter has been 10 or more times to look for the light, "good" light not only depends on the position of the sun but also on haze on so on.
If you under expose the ISO 100 shot by 1 stop, then it is the same file like ISO 200 without exposure correction. (it's the same shutter speed)dont get the point, "ISO 200 and ISO 100 -1EV exposure correction gives you the same RAW file" and "it just gives you 1 stop more highlight recovery at the expense of cleaner shadows", so is it the same file or not?^^
Yes and i said this is not the case because dynamic range is more than just highlight recovery. It's also about shadow recovery.what are you talking about under exposure? I said ISO 200 gives more dynamic range and I dont set exposure by compensation but manual all the time^^
Allow me:The Merrill sensor is ISO-less,
I have never heard that. What do you mean?
Tony
It means that "ISO" is just a "tag" in the RAW file. ISO 800 in reality is the same like ISO 100 under exposed by 3 stops. If you open it in RAW Digger, you will see a very dark/"under exposed" photo.The Merrill sensor is ISO-less,
I have never heard that. What do you mean?
Tony
The trouble here is that "dynamic range" has several definitions. Therefore the statement might or might not be correct. For example, noise-based and taking the range as being between the brightest and darkest parts of an image, we could say that dark noise is some number, maybe 8, which is always there no matter what the exposure.I said ISO 200 gives more dynamic range and I don't set exposure by compensation but manual all the time^^
No, it's the same like with Bayer Cameras. You can change the WB non destructive in SPP later to your taste.Does the Sigma Raw file alter when the WB in the camera is changed?