shooting p30 and p30+ for about 4 years now, i´m on my way to upgrade to the p65+.
I`m doing 99% of my work in the editorial business ( www.glaescher.de) and would love to have some more usable iso and a full frame sensor one my DF
But:
is there a visible difference between the micro lens sensor ( p30+) and the p65+ sensor in therms of color, moire and usable iso, and a significant difference on battery life and processor performance on my mac pro?
As I do understand the difference between the p65+ and the IQ 160 is only the screen, and a lot of euros, but no difference in image quality? is that right?
thanks for help
Joerg
I`m doing 99% of my work in the editorial business ( www.glaescher.de) and would love to have some more usable iso and a full frame sensor one my DF
But:
is there a visible difference between the micro lens sensor ( p30+) and the p65+ sensor in therms of color, moire and usable iso, and a significant difference on battery life and processor performance on my mac pro?
As I do understand the difference between the p65+ and the IQ 160 is only the screen, and a lot of euros, but no difference in image quality? is that right?
thanks for help
Joerg