usm
Well-known member
... but the most active
How good is a Schneider PC-TS Super Angulon 4.5/28 HM Aspheric when used with a Sony (don’t know the names) or Leica M?
I know it’s not MF but the lens is based on a MF lens - right?
I also know that a Leica M is the “wrong” decision for using with shift lenses.
But I like it and I have it.
I have a Leica 28mm pc lens, I am happy but not with the hard to control distortion when shifted to the max. I also looked at the Cambo Actus and AS Universalis but there is no 28mm and it’s getting really expensive when Rodenstock is involved. Maybe a 32/35 lens with a big image circle and a lot of movement and stitching does the trick. But still its getting expensive.
As some of you saw, there is a Schneider PC-TS Super Angulon 4.5/28 HM Aspheric for sale. That’s the reason for my question: how good is this lens for architecture and landscape?
Thanks!
How good is a Schneider PC-TS Super Angulon 4.5/28 HM Aspheric when used with a Sony (don’t know the names) or Leica M?
I know it’s not MF but the lens is based on a MF lens - right?
I also know that a Leica M is the “wrong” decision for using with shift lenses.
But I like it and I have it.
I have a Leica 28mm pc lens, I am happy but not with the hard to control distortion when shifted to the max. I also looked at the Cambo Actus and AS Universalis but there is no 28mm and it’s getting really expensive when Rodenstock is involved. Maybe a 32/35 lens with a big image circle and a lot of movement and stitching does the trick. But still its getting expensive.
As some of you saw, there is a Schneider PC-TS Super Angulon 4.5/28 HM Aspheric for sale. That’s the reason for my question: how good is this lens for architecture and landscape?
Thanks!