Tim
Active member
I posted this in the post process forum and got no response, I thought perhaps it belongs in the printing forum, so here is the question --
If the final destination of a Foveon image is a Fuji mini lab 8 x 10 or other size, should the image be resampled for 300dpi for best output?
Sigma Photo Pro saves as 180dpi with no other option of output that I can see, and I can understand this from the viewpoint of large format inkjet printing. I know many of the RIPs employed on photo imagers would deal with the image so is it just best left at its "native" res as saved by SSP? I can import to other packages via tiff to resample with no loss of course.
On the subject of Fuji Minilabs should we send a tiff or will a HQ jpg be just as good?
My guess is there is no need for the extra colour space offered by the tiff.
Thoughts?
If the final destination of a Foveon image is a Fuji mini lab 8 x 10 or other size, should the image be resampled for 300dpi for best output?
Sigma Photo Pro saves as 180dpi with no other option of output that I can see, and I can understand this from the viewpoint of large format inkjet printing. I know many of the RIPs employed on photo imagers would deal with the image so is it just best left at its "native" res as saved by SSP? I can import to other packages via tiff to resample with no loss of course.
On the subject of Fuji Minilabs should we send a tiff or will a HQ jpg be just as good?
My guess is there is no need for the extra colour space offered by the tiff.
Thoughts?