Hmm, to be honest, these samples don't look much different than the Gx100 to me. It still looks like there is noise, color fringing and softness that betray the size of its sensor. Ergonomically, the GX100/200/GRD still look better to me. I do like the idea of the lens, but to be fair, it is only a half stop faster at the wide end than the GX100 (2.0 versus 2.4), while the GX100 goes to 72mm versus 60mm. It is noticeably faster at the long end. It will be interesting to see how it compares in resolution and distortion.
Anyway, I don't mean to put down this camera -- it still looks good. I just think we need to put it in perspective. It is still a slow, noisy compact camera just like every digital compact ever made (including the DP1, which while it may have a larger sensor, is astoundingly slow in operation). I am still waiting for an equivalent of something like the Contax T series, Nikon 35ti, or Leica CM. When there is a full frame sensor (even 6-10mp) in a compact body, things will be much more interesting.