Makten
Well-known member
I know I've told myself not to get the ZM 35/1.4, but I'm reconsidering it. Currently I own the Loxia 35/2 which is great stopped down, and it gives a very nice, low contrast bokeh at f/3.2, especially at a bit of distance. However, that is a smaller aperture than I'd like, and opening up makes the bokeh much worse. There's also a very strange curvature of field (or something I can't understand) that makes DOF larger in the middle of the image, even if I can't see the actual field being curved.
So, how does the 35/1.4 do bokeh-wise at a few meters distance and stopped down to f/2-2.8? I know it's a bit harsh wide open, but many lenses get better when stopping down.
-------------
Here's one from today with the Loxia @ f/3.2:
Edit: The forum compresses the image slightly, so right-click and open the image in a new tab.
So, how does the 35/1.4 do bokeh-wise at a few meters distance and stopped down to f/2-2.8? I know it's a bit harsh wide open, but many lenses get better when stopping down.
-------------
Here's one from today with the Loxia @ f/3.2:
Edit: The forum compresses the image slightly, so right-click and open the image in a new tab.