If this is your personal feeling about your personal work, and not some ridiculous indictment of digital vs film capture, then why don't you let go of your notion that digital capture means "take a whole pile of careless photographs and produce the results with a computer" and apply the same level of study, forethought, technique, and intent to your use of a digital camera that you do to using a film camera? Understand the differences between the capture mediums and what that means to the evaluation of exposure, the selection of sensitivity setting, the use of processing tools, and the techniques of printing the results. Make every exposure as perfectly framed and exposed as you do with film. Make every rendering and print with the same delicious care that you expend when producing your film images.
You might find that the differences between your film and digital capture work disappear when you do that. Of course, if you don't, just keep on shooting film and enjoy yourself making photographs that satisfy whatever aesthetic and philosophical criteria you want to evaluate them by.
You don't have to make some absurd public disclosure of your preference for one capture medium over the other along with pretentious folderol about why you feel that way and how applicable your notions might be to the rest of the community. You can just exhibit or present your lovely photographs and allow everyone to enjoy them with you. And if someone asks, you just tell them how a particular photograph was made.
... Because if it's all just "What I Like" without the overweening pretentiousness and condescension of 'why what I like is superior to what I don't like', your thoughts on photography and your photographs avoid being an affront to sensible, capable photographers and artists who think differently from you.
G