Shashin
Well-known member
It is quite simple for me:
DPReview studio test scene
DXO mark scores
People giving opinions and taking nice images is more about the person and their skills. I prefer a more quantitative approach.
On the other side, people talking about specs and simple optical theory are not very enlightening either. Mostly because they don't understand the significance of their numbers. If you have to make two identical images and compare them at 100% to state there is something significant, then you are probably bad at math.
I wish there were reviewers that could take a systemic view of the photographic process including the final destination a image will arrive at--the human observer.
Still, the outcome is always the same: we are just going to buy what we desire.
DPReview studio test scene
DXO mark scores
People giving opinions and taking nice images is more about the person and their skills. I prefer a more quantitative approach.
On the other side, people talking about specs and simple optical theory are not very enlightening either. Mostly because they don't understand the significance of their numbers. If you have to make two identical images and compare them at 100% to state there is something significant, then you are probably bad at math.
I wish there were reviewers that could take a systemic view of the photographic process including the final destination a image will arrive at--the human observer.
Still, the outcome is always the same: we are just going to buy what we desire.