I know, i know, strange question coming here:
I am after a slower pace type of landscape photography.
I wondered about user experience between a A7r with a 24mm TS lens (or additionally 17mm later) on a tripod vs an Alpa STC (or other tech cam) combined with an older back (Hasselblad 39 MP) and equivalent lens.
In theory it seems the A7r could technically deliver the same functions, but I am afraid such a combo might feel "strange" to use.
On the other side life view in each and every part of the image with magnification sounds like one can take full advantage of T/S options.
I also understand digital backs should deliver superioir IQ (DR and color and detail) but any of the newer generation backs is not an option for me due to price and the fact that this would be only an addition to my Leica S gear for slow pace landscape photography with movements.
I am after a slower pace type of landscape photography.
I wondered about user experience between a A7r with a 24mm TS lens (or additionally 17mm later) on a tripod vs an Alpa STC (or other tech cam) combined with an older back (Hasselblad 39 MP) and equivalent lens.
In theory it seems the A7r could technically deliver the same functions, but I am afraid such a combo might feel "strange" to use.
On the other side life view in each and every part of the image with magnification sounds like one can take full advantage of T/S options.
I also understand digital backs should deliver superioir IQ (DR and color and detail) but any of the newer generation backs is not an option for me due to price and the fact that this would be only an addition to my Leica S gear for slow pace landscape photography with movements.