While I don't want to go negative, really, this piece has a lousy scent to it, sounding too much like rather lame doing-her-duty as an ambassador. Some of what she says really blows her credibility, IMO.She's sponsored by Panasonic, so take it for what it is,
https://www.journalofnomads.com/panasonic-lumix-g90-g95-review/
--to wit:
Although she never had the G80/85, she's heard it has a good grip, but as the new model's was redesigned, it must be better. That's a non-sequitur (considering my complaint of how great the GX7's was in contrast i.p. to GX80/85's redesigned one).
She misstates that the "kit" lens is a "Leica" 12-60 --that would be the 2.8-4 creature; elsewhere in the article, this is (rightly) contradicted.
SAD, IMO, I see the same kit-pkg-only sales issue, for N.America, at least, per DPReview : "The G95 is only being offered as a kit in North America with the 12-60mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH Power OIS zoom. This combination will set you back around $1199, which is a $200 premium over the comparable G85 kit. : that's not appealing to current users who want to upgrade/add a camera and have already their desired lenses.
I wondered if maybe Panasonic had provided her a checklist of things to mention; but they --offering now the S1-- surely didn't create this slip:
She'll want to double that doubling!The sensor of a Micro Four Thirds camera (also called a mirrorless camera), in this case the G90, is half the size of a full sensor camera, like a DSLR.
And this wizzard summary take?
As opposed to a copy with just a new number?!You might wonder if there’s really a big difference between the Lumix G90/95 and the Lumix G80/85. While both cameras show a lot of similarities, I’d definitely say that the G90 is an upgraded version.
Well, sorry Tre, there it is : a <grumph>