kit laughlin
Subscriber Member
Now that C1Pro7 handles the X-Trans (and this processor was well reviewed recently by Sean Reid), surely some intrepid person will do this?
I do not consider myself sufficiently well versed in capture one pro to do this kind of comparison but I would be very very interested in results.
My 'seat-of-the-pants' comparison of hundreds of images from both cameras suggests that, at the pixel level, the DP2M still has the wood on the X-E1, but it will not make any difference to printed images, and the DP2M will still have that look that many of us like. Additionally, I was really happy with skin tones from the X-E1 when processed by capture one pro, and the results out of C1Pro7 with very little tweaking were definitely better than the jpegs SOOC—which up until then had wowed me, and many others!
I do not consider myself sufficiently well versed in capture one pro to do this kind of comparison but I would be very very interested in results.
My 'seat-of-the-pants' comparison of hundreds of images from both cameras suggests that, at the pixel level, the DP2M still has the wood on the X-E1, but it will not make any difference to printed images, and the DP2M will still have that look that many of us like. Additionally, I was really happy with skin tones from the X-E1 when processed by capture one pro, and the results out of C1Pro7 with very little tweaking were definitely better than the jpegs SOOC—which up until then had wowed me, and many others!