Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Remarkable. If all this is true, and I mean both experiences, then I'd say there is a production issue or (as suggested) a settings issue.Another quote by someone else from said reference, quote:
”[FONT="]Interesting. I did a hands on with the GFX 100 (no S in there by the way) that Fuji sponsored at Camera. West. I’m currently shooting a 50s. Even with the lenses lacking the firmware upgrade, and the pre-production software, the raw files I shot were far and away more detailed and sharp to the point that shooting portraits could be a problem without some serious “flattering” processing.[/FONT][FONT="]There was something either seriously wrong with your camera, or its settings”
[/FONT]
Thanks Bart.Remarkable. If all this is true, and I mean both experiences, then I'd say there is a production issue or (as suggested) a settings issue.
If it is a production issue then shame on Fuji for poor QA/QC.
Time will tell.
:watch:
So I went to collect my GFX-100S...
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4407503
Quote:
"So with all that goodness, why did I walk away?
One reason only; it isn't as sharp as my GFX-50S!" :banghead:
In the comments ... relevant questions.
For sure IMHO Fuji has to address this issue ASAP! :facesmack:
To answer my own question: DPreview have some RAW's available.Are there RAW-files (RAF) to be downloaded ?
I'd like to see for myself.
TIA.
Yup, what did you find out? :salute:To answer my own question: DPreview have some RAW's available.
I’ll tell you tomorrow ... :grin:Yup, what did you find out? :salute:
Options |
---|