Guy Mancuso
Administrator, Instructor
Batis 85 2.8 using Eye AF. Go look in the menu for that on your Canon. Blaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
You are referring to the Canon 1D mk IV sensor size.This new Canon sensor is not even full frame according to the specs that were published. It is supposedly an H size sensor (slightly larger than APS-C) and if that is correct I can't imagine what problems the high pixel density might create. Did I mis-read the specs or is this really a small sensor with very high pixel density? Reminds me of the TruColor sensor in my Nokia 1020 cell phone with much smaller 41 MP sensor but also very high pixel density. The nokia produces nice images that can rival APS-C sensor image quality so if Canon uses similar TruColor processing technology then a 120MP H size sensor might be interesting indeed.
No, I'm referring to the new 120 MP H size sensor prototype camera.You are referring to the Canon 1D mk IV sensor size.
The 5DS/R is a "full frame" 24x36.
Even though most of my cameras are full frame, it is incidental to my choices and not a must have.
Thanks Guy. That's a great shot.
Batis 85 2.8 using Eye AF. Go look in the menu for that on your Canon. Blaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
I agree with your point. I think the OP's post is silly.Response deleted. Tired of brand bashing.
Take care,
Matt
I'm advanced, have my pics around the web, sell print even in China, and do not get this DR war either. There is numerous well known (FAMOUS) landscape photographers who use Canon. It's kind a bad thing to insult them, because I see that as a sort of pedant insult. Pardon me if I'm wrong.He doesn't really 'get' DR because he isn't advanced enough yet.
I look at this forum and others, days after days. I do not see ppl improving their skills at all and pictures do not wow me more and more. In fact, I'm looking into old threads because some old threads and picture just wow me. You might try, it's coolSure, a lot of you are photographers who are so solid in your vision and purpose that 1 extra stop of DR or high ISO adds materially to your photographic output or enjoyment.
Isn't that what Kodak did? :bugeyes:One of best ways to innovate is to keep improving the same stuff while everyone is doing the same 'new thing' elsewhere.
That is not what they did. They innovated and others improvised (it can happen to Sony as well if the same corporate culture is emulated).Isn't that what Kodak did? :bugeyes:
I'm advanced, have my pics around the web, sell print even in China, and do not get this DR war either. There is numerous well known (FAMOUS) landscape photographers who use Canon. It's kind a bad thing to insult them, because I see that as a sort of pedant insult. Pardon me if I'm wrong.
I look at this forum and others, days after days. I do not see ppl improving their skills at all and pictures do not wow me more and more. In fact, I'm looking into old threads because some old threads and picture just wow me. You might try, it's cool
Thanks. BTW I loaded 10.3.3 of C1 update and it has both Batis lens corrections in it. I still need to test this throughly but even my grandsons shot you can see a visible distortion correction with the 85. I love this lens but this distortion we have to control going forward. I really need to see how it is with buildings and straight lines but everyone should update there C1.Thanks Guy. That's a great shot.
With Eye AF and a little practice it's easy to nail these kinds of shots, I find.
In your hands your Zeiss Batis lens really shines on your A7r2. Congratulations.
Been there done that and I have moved on. Those who relish OVF (Leica is moving on to EVF as well) should enjoy and make full use of what they cherish.You'll see ppl nailing focus with f1.2 manual lenses on moving subjects and old DSLR in the middle of mirrorless or leica users.
I roger what you say Guy. I see the numbers on the forum and see where the interest is : Sony because of hype and MF because ... MF is MF. When I look at sony forum I see a load of threads about techniques, ppl wanting to segregate gear into the same brand (thus making numerous child threads). It is hard to decipher, hard to follow and always brand orientated.
Personally I would like, on GetDPI forum, a general 35mm forum, where ppl can share photography with whatever gear they possess or are able to buy in the 35mm world, same for APS-C and MFT. I'm sure it would be cool, less segregationist.
You'll see ppl nailing focus with f1.2 manual lenses on moving subjects and old DSLR in the middle of mirrorless or leica users. The goal, after all, is sharing photography and pleasure.
IMHO it would be an extremely valuable addition to getDPI, especially in today gear extravaganza (you start to see that I do not care about gear).