The GetDPI Photography Forum

Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!

Das Wesentliche … 🤑

Godfrey

Well-known member
Interesting, but I'm content with my M10-M and M10-R. :)
I am getting the hots for a Summaron-M 28/5.6, however. :eek:

G
 

Knorp

Well-known member
Interesting, but I'm content with my M10-M and M10-R. :)
I am getting the hots for a Summaron-M 28/5.6, however. :eek:

G
Why not, G. Go for it !
I’m very pleased with my tiny Voigts and my ‘60 Summaron 3.5/35
Kind regards.
 

algrove

Well-known member
No thank you very much, Lou. One crippled M is enough.
KoW - my M11P is up till now working flawlessly, although, so it seems, condemned to FW 2.0.1
All the best.
What do you mean? Crippled? Just because of the FW?
 

Photon42

Well-known member
Also happy with my M10s (RBP and M). Nothing drives me to the successor, even if it goes to 11 :LOL:
 

Shashin

Well-known member
The Keck telescopes are 17,500mm f/1.4 . That aperture is not a misprint. Only two were made. At 300 tons and $70,000,000, each, they're not very transportable. :ROFLMAO:
But I have an APS-C size sensor. Why is it so hard to find a wide super-duper-telephoto for small sensor cameras?
 
Top