gogopix
Subscriber
Ugly! The insect, not the photo.
just needs a good shave.
Rob, your focusing skills always amaze me!
Victor
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Ugly! The insect, not the photo.
I left the ISO at 400, underexposed by two stops.doug, did you 'push' this with one or two stops on exposure comp?
yes, I noticed the noise was really not bad!I left the ISO at 400, underexposed by two stops.
Doug:I left the ISO at 400, underexposed by two stops.
I'm using Flexcolor, but to be honest I don't know if it's the latest version. I'll have to try a higher ISO.Doug:
What RAW program are you using. Though I don't use it often, I found the latest Flexcolor is very good with the higher ISO DMR shots.
The latest Flexcolor is 4.8.4, but I think the improvements may have come in 4.8.1 or 4.8.3. All the latest revisions were just to support some of the new Hasselblad cameras and lenses.I'm using Flexcolor, but to be honest I don't know if it's the latest version. I'll have to try a higher ISO.
I don't ever use the underexposure trick. I have not been convinced it works or actually have tested it myself. I am not sure if some people are actually under exposing by two stops and getting really dark files or if they are just dialing in -2 for exposure compensation.Wonderful image Doug.
I get good results underexposing the DMR at ISO 400 but not so at ISO 800, but I am using C1. Have you had success underexposing at 800 and I wonder if using Flexcolor is the key? Rob?