simonstucki
New member
Hi, I recently found that on a photo taken with the 20/1.7 at 1.7 with the om-d at 400asa (1/640s so I know the best combination for the shot but that's not the point here)
this is out of camera raw (LR4).
this is a corrected version done with LR4 (notice the discoloration of the blue webbing thing at the lower left, as well as the "color clouds" in the shadows).
is that normal seems a bit extreme to me. this was not a test I just discovered it in LR and tried to correct it very easy in LR but the result is of course not very good given the extreme case. I will do some tests with other lenses and other apertures when I find the time. In the meantime I was wondering if somebody else has the same problem with that lens (which I liked a lot on the gf1 and still like on the om-d for some shots but to a significantly lesser degree especially now) or if I might have a defective sample.
looking forward to your comments.
simon
this is out of camera raw (LR4).
this is a corrected version done with LR4 (notice the discoloration of the blue webbing thing at the lower left, as well as the "color clouds" in the shadows).
is that normal seems a bit extreme to me. this was not a test I just discovered it in LR and tried to correct it very easy in LR but the result is of course not very good given the extreme case. I will do some tests with other lenses and other apertures when I find the time. In the meantime I was wondering if somebody else has the same problem with that lens (which I liked a lot on the gf1 and still like on the om-d for some shots but to a significantly lesser degree especially now) or if I might have a defective sample.
looking forward to your comments.
simon